Doesn't seem to have fixed anything: https://clima.github.io/OceananigansDocumentation/previews/PR5356/models/coriolis#traditional-plane-traditional-beta-plane. Note also how the section anchor is not the ID you used in the PR. I still believe this is a DocumenterVitepress.jl bug.

That should fix it, I cannot reproduce the issue, see below.

The preview should be at (PR5380 not PR5356 )

https://clima.github.io/OceananigansDocumentation/previews/PR5380/models/coriolis#traditional-plane-traditional-beta-plane.

(deleted now).

and using id is the current workaround for this case (header + equation), open to suggestions (PRs).

I was under the impression that, at least in the main text, LaTeX is done within double backticks. For section titles it should be $?

both should work here, DVpress parses ``...`` to $ ... $ because vitepress uses $ $ for inline math.

So we do need the @ids?

So we do need the @ids?

yes, for now, until there is another solution.

And I said before, I think your previous commit did fix things, you were only looking at the wrong PR preview.

So when do we need to add an @id even if we don't need/use it. When the section title has LaTeX in it?

When the section title has LaTeX in it?

yes, as far as know 😄, I haven't seen other cases, ahhh... and also I think when you have the same header (for whatever reason ) in the same file.

Cool! I'll merge when someone approves ;)