What this PR does

Use optional chaining for safer openclaw state access in migration 197.

Before this PR:

Migration from a very old state may fail at step 197 if openclaw does not exist in the state.

After this PR:

No failure.

Fixes #

Why we need it and why it was done in this way

The following tradeoffs were made:

The following alternatives were considered:

Links to places where the discussion took place:

Breaking changes

If this PR introduces breaking changes, please describe the changes and the impact on users.

Special notes for your reviewer

Checklist

This checklist is not enforcing, but it's a reminder of items that could be relevant to every PR.
Approvers are expected to review this list.

• PR: The PR description is expressive enough and will help future contributors
• Code: Write code that humans can understand and Keep it simple
• Refactor: You have left the code cleaner than you found it (Boy Scout Rule)
• Upgrade: Impact of this change on upgrade flows was considered and addressed if required
• Documentation: A user-guide update was considered and is present (link) or not required. Check this only when the PR introduces or changes a user-facing feature or behavior.
• Self-review: I have reviewed my own code (e.g., via /gh-pr-review, gh pr diff, or GitHub UI) before requesting review from others

Release note

Use optional chaining for safer `openclaw` state access in migration 197.