Skip to content

Deprecate undocumented Butler-Volmer reaction options#750

Merged
speth merged 1 commit intoCantera:masterfrom
speth:deprecate-butler-volmer
Nov 30, 2019
Merged

Deprecate undocumented Butler-Volmer reaction options#750
speth merged 1 commit intoCantera:masterfrom
speth:deprecate-butler-volmer

Conversation

@speth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@speth speth commented Nov 12, 2019

As mentioned in #749, I believe that there are implementation issues that prevent most if not all of it from being used at present (for both 2.4.0 and the current master branch) due to two mutually-exclusive conditions: (a) we don't currently allow reactant orders to be specified for reversible reactions and (b) Butler-Volmer reactions are required to be reversible and involve manipulating the reaction orders.

I think the easiest path forward to supporting these Butler-Volmer and other reaction types is to deprecate and remove these non-functional versions, and re-consider implementation after the next release.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #750 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 7.69%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #750      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.83%   70.81%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         372      372              
  Lines       43720    43733      +13     
==========================================
  Hits        30971    30971              
- Misses      12749    12762      +13
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
include/cantera/kinetics/Reaction.h 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
include/cantera/kinetics/InterfaceKinetics.h 28.57% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/kinetics/Reaction.cpp 85.98% <7.69%> (-1.66%) ⬇️
src/transport/GasTransport.cpp 90.58% <0%> (-0.21%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 719cb3d...fddac22. Read the comment docs.

@decaluwe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Agreed, particularly as there is a bit of 'philosophical' discussion to be hashed out about how we'd like to best implement and support this functionality. No need for those discussions to hold up the release of other functionality, at present.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants