Conversation
|
@BangShiuh ... sorry for being too eager merging #1099! I had assumed that the PR was ready as all review comments had been addressed 😂 |
f303023 to
21c7fb6
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1166 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 65.37% 65.37%
=======================================
Files 318 318
Lines 46137 46145 +8
Branches 19612 19615 +3
=======================================
+ Hits 30160 30166 +6
- Misses 13474 13475 +1
- Partials 2503 2504 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
21c7fb6 to
e87fad6
Compare
|
@ischoegl I keep getting NAN value for my reaction rate even if I force m_Ea_R and m_EE_R to be zero. |
|
Hi @BangShiuh ... could you rebase on |
speth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In addition to rebasing, here are a couple of other suggestions -- I think the NAN-equality issue I pointed out might be the cause of your test failures.
e87fad6 to
6294adc
Compare
|
@speth I have fixed those issues. Good to go? |
ischoegl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No comments from my side, as all my concerns had already been addressed in a previous PR.
speth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the updates in response to the previous review, and I'm glad to see all the tests are now passing.
The only thing left is that there are a couple of checks for NAN that I think are unnecessary.
Changes proposed in this pull request
If applicable, fill in the issue number this pull request is fixing
Closes #
If applicable, provide an example illustrating new features this pull request is introducing
Checklist
scons build&scons test) and unit tests address code coverage