Conversation
|
Hi, this LGTM and should mostly work because you also added the |
|
ci fails due to formatting issues, can you fix that? |
Hi, i don't have knowledge on ci/cd pipeline but I can surely try 😄.. although it would take some time |
|
I think Although I'm not sure that this commit won't fail :) |
test/widget_test.dart
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| // This is a basic Flutter widget test. | |||
|
I'll try to fix CI failure |
|
Could you please run the checks again? |
|
Looks like formatting still fails could you run flutter format .
flutter pub get
flutter pub run import_sorter:main --no-comments |
I sorted the imports |
|
@techno-disaster, please run the tests again :) |
|
How can I check all the workflows locally without having you run the tests again and again ...might be a dumb question :) |
should be enough I guess |
thanks ! |
|
I think it should work now :") |
@rajoriaakash were you able to look into this? |
I haven't looked into it as of now, will look. |
|
I checked all the options from bloc_concurrency and idts it would fail on any of them. Although I think sequential is good to go. |
|
Yep SGTM, the default was sequential anyway. Thanks for your work! A couple of merge conflicts, do you think you can fix them anytime soon? Also bloc v9 is a thing but should be easy to migrate afaik. |
|
@hrideshmg maybe you can takeover this PR for the block changes? |
|
Thank you for the effort on this migration! Unfortunately, this PR has been open for nearly 4 years and has accumulated merge conflicts. Additionally, Bloc v9 is now available, so a v8 migration is no longer the right target. Closing this as it would need to be redone from scratch targeting the current Bloc version. Thanks for your contribution to the project! |
Fixes #9