Switch to the development branch of Cpp2IL
#533
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Kasuromi
approved these changes
Dec 24, 2022
Member
Kasuromi
left a comment
Kasuromi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good.
Runs without issue on GTFO (Unity 2019.4.21f1) and x86 TestGame (2021.3.4f1) - which previously had issues with initializing Cpp2IL
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request enables Bepinex to use the latest Cpp2IL.
Motivation and Context
The
new-analysisbranch is legacy, and support has only been held for Bepinex. Switching would allow full focus on thedevelopmentbranch.How Has This Been Tested?
It has not been tested, but similar code was used in AssetRipper.
Types of changes
Checklist: