Skip to content

Conversation

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor

@kloudkl kloudkl commented Mar 9, 2014

In practical applications, many users need to feed data of varying batch sizes into the network. The detailed design of this PR was formed in the discussion of #119.
#189 may involved similar but more complex blob memory operations, but this PR only focuses on batch size.

Many but not all the layers have passed the dynamic batch sizes test cases right now.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for making this consistent with the internal indexing by N x K x H x W.

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member

This is welcome flexibility! Please update us when tests pass so that we can assign a reviewer. Thanks.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add comments for this function?

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kloudkl commented Mar 25, 2014

This needs to be revised to be consistent with #250.

@kloudkl
Copy link
Contributor Author

kloudkl commented Jun 10, 2014

Too many things have changed since the initial commits. There is almost no difference between rebasing and rewriting. Closing this to relaunch the efforts based on #355 (#250) and #479.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants