[Cherry pick] Fix for Config File Path not found#1693
Merged
Aniruddh25 merged 5 commits intorelease/0.8from Sep 7, 2023
Merged
[Cherry pick] Fix for Config File Path not found#1693Aniruddh25 merged 5 commits intorelease/0.8from
Aniruddh25 merged 5 commits intorelease/0.8from
Conversation
Collaborator
Aniruddh25
commented
Sep 7, 2023
- Cherry Picks Fix Config File Path Issue #1681
## Why make this change? - With the overhaul of the config system using our own Write method while serializing objects, the config that is generated is misaligned with respect to indentation for all the keys under each entity name. For e.g.: In the following picture, the entity name `Todo` is indented with 4 leading spaces, subsequently its child key `source` should have been indented with 6 leading spaces, however its currently indented with only 2 spaces.  - This is a regression in 0.8.44-rc. ## What is this change? - Use the same writer to serialize the subkeys under the entity name so that the depth of indentation is maintained. ## How does this change fix the issue? - `WriteRawValue` writes the json string argument provided as is without doing any additional formatting on it. It doesn't utilize the `_currentDepth` private member of the writer to determine how to indent. - Prior to this change, we were generating the inner json string first then writing the generated inner json "as is". While generating that json on line 29 https://github.com/Azure/data-api-builder/blob/31b754251832ffebf4c4ce36ffcbead9baff6355/src/Config/Converters/RuntimeEntitiesConverter.cs#L29 Line 29 in [31b7542](31b7542) a new writer is being used by the `JsonSerializer.Serialize()` function, effectively resetting the `_currentDepth`. The `_currentDepth` of the writer in context was not getting honored. ## How was this tested? - Manual test, building solution and using `dab add` to simulate automatic writing of an entity to the config file. With the change, the indentation is fixed. 
## Why make this change? - Closes #1674 ConfigFile was not found when running in the Azure Container Apps. ## What is this change? - Because of the way we used to fetch the cofigFileName, the path was lost, due to which using config file present in a different directory was giving `file not found` error. - So we updated the method to fetch the configFileNamewihoutExtension to keep the original path. - To run Azure Container Apps `--ConfigFileName` is provided with the full path name to the mounted config file. NOTE: * This issue might be caught in Az Container apps but this is not specifically related to Containers, because the current file name generation process was itself incorrect in 0.8.* release. * When we try to get the `fileNameWithoutExtension` in the method `GetFileNameForEnvironment`, we used to lose directory information, for example: if baseConfigFile is`dab/configs/dab-config.json`, then `configFileNameWithoutExtension` was coming as `dab-config`, which is incorrect. * This issue started happening from 0.8.* because in the earlier release (0.7.6), if config file name is provided by user, we directly used it without searching for overrides and environments, unlike 0.8.*. And the precedence check used to happen for cases where config file is not provided by user. * Now, since 0.8.*, we started using the method `GetFileNameWithoutExtension`, which is incorrect causing File not found issue whenever the config file is not in current directory. * The method `DoesFileExistInCurrentDirectory()` checks if the file exists by combining the current directory with the fileName. Now if file is existing in some other directory inside current directory, then for proper searching the file should contain complete info about the directory. So, if current dicrectory is `C:/dab`, and file is in `C:/dab/configs/dab-config.json`, then the file name should either be full path or `/configs/dab-configs.json` for it to be searched. ## Additional Change 1. Fixing name of variables and function name to correctly reflect their behavior. 2. Fixing issue with not honoring the user provided config file, (caused after 0.8 release). (Putting in this PR, because this PR aims at fixing how we are using the config files and not just a bug fix.) ## How was this tested? - [X] Running In Azure Container Apps BEFORE:  AFTER:  - [X] Local Testing BEFORE:  AFTER:  - [X] Unit Tests --------- Co-authored-by: Aniruddh Munde <[email protected]>
severussundar
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.