-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move ArchiveResult from detail index.json history to database model #525
Conversation
Current state: functional. Missing:
|
…s the relevant information
…abase on public index view
@pirate Ready for review. |
This is great so far, sorry I took so long to review it. I'm going to merge it into v0.5 then release because I think it's important for the performance gains and I want v0.5 to be the "performance release". |
Thanks for the review! I will fix all of those details today (they are all small details). |
@pirate implemented all of the fixes. After you approve it, I will rebase-merge it. |
@pirate Added two changes you requested. I think this is ready for review.
I also bumped the django version to 3.1 |
Summary
When this PR is ready, archivebox will be able to:
Related issues
#513
Changes these areas