Skip to content

Conversation

@drroe
Copy link
Contributor

@drroe drroe commented Jan 31, 2022

Hopefully this will future-proof the test case in case cluster ends up generating more sets.

@hainm It would be better long-term to be able to select by DataSet name/aspect.

generating more sets. Would be better to be able to select by aspect.
@drroe drroe self-assigned this Jan 31, 2022
@hainm
Copy link
Contributor

hainm commented Jan 31, 2022

Hopefully this will future-proof the test case in case cluster ends up generating more sets.

Thanks. To answer your question in Amber-MD/cpptraj#939 (comment): I think the first and 2nd datasets are topology and trajectory.

@hainm It would be better long-term to be able to select by DataSet name/aspect.

I think pytraj has it:

def get_dataset(self, idx=None, name=None, dtype=None):
but pytraj has not use it anywhere. I did not foresee that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants