Skip to content

SingleDropEvap test for GCM implementation#561

Merged
baperry2 merged 33 commits intoAMReX-Combustion:developmentfrom
d-montgomery:gcm-dev
Sep 22, 2025
Merged

SingleDropEvap test for GCM implementation#561
baperry2 merged 33 commits intoAMReX-Combustion:developmentfrom
d-montgomery:gcm-dev

Conversation

@d-montgomery
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@d-montgomery d-montgomery commented Sep 2, 2025

These are the scripts used to run the GCM vs. PeleMP SingleDropEvap tests shown in PelePhysics #615

  • Compile with SPRAY_GCM=TRUE or FALSE (for PeleMP implementation)
  • Run test case using the Validate.py script with LiqPropsType="gcm" or "mp"
  • If you've run a test case with both LiqPropsType you can compare them using CompareLiqPropsType.py

This is still a work in progress and needs to be cleaned up a bit before review.

@d-montgomery d-montgomery marked this pull request as ready for review September 15, 2025 19:09
endif()
target_compile_definitions(${pele_physics_lib_name} PUBLIC PELE_USE_SPRAY PELELM_USE_SPRAY)
target_compile_definitions(${pele_physics_lib_name} PUBLIC SPRAY_FUEL_NUM=${PELE_PHYSICS_SPRAY_FUEL_NUM})
target_compile_definitions(${pele_physics_lib_name} PUBLIC PELE_SPRAY_GCM SPRAY_GCM)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be PELE_PHYSICS_SPRAY_GCM instead of SPRAY_GCM to match all the CMakeLists.txt?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch for consistency.

@d-montgomery
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think this should be good to go now.

@baperry2 baperry2 merged commit 933c26b into AMReX-Combustion:development Sep 22, 2025
24 checks passed
@d-montgomery d-montgomery deleted the gcm-dev branch September 23, 2025 14:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants