Remove uses of Box range version of amrex::launch#4890
Merged
WeiqunZhang merged 2 commits intoAMReX-Codes:developmentfrom Jan 12, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
There are more instances of such device launches in the linear solvers; there are several |
WeiqunZhang
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
There are two very different types of functions called
amrex::launch. One gives raw access to a GPU block to be used with shared memory. The other type iterates over threads more like ParallelFor but gives a Box to the functor, not an IntVect. For GPU the box will only have one element, for CPU this is the same box that was passed into launch. This was used to quickly port amrex CPU code to GPU. However, I find this quite confusing.This PR replaces the uses of the second type of launch inside amrex with ParallelFor and removes the section in the documentation that covered it. This avoids having to write the 4D loop inside every kernel.
TODO (in a future PR?): replace ...LAMBDA_RANGE macros used in LinearSolvers.
Additional background
Checklist
The proposed changes: