Is this fine on Linux, MacOS and gcc and clang? IIRC the platform independent / correct way would be to use , "%" PRId64, here (but it's super ugly so I'd prefer %lld if it works fine..)

Is this fine on Linux, MacOS and gcc and clang? IIRC the platform independent / correct way would be to use , "%" PRId64, here (but it's super ugly so I'd prefer %lld if it works fine..)

I find this issue on MacOS and have not tried it on other platforms. But I feel like there's no problem on other platforms either. Perhaps it would be better to change to '%' PRId64?

Probably safer, yes, IIRC on linux sometimes I needed %ld instead of %lld specifically, but I don't have a machine to test right now

Tried it, seems fine, thanks! :)

Oops actually now it warns on linux, will fix it manually

Fixed in d0782a7