Conversation
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
Note this doesn't currently work |
|
@aidanheerdegen there are a few more refs that you have to change - that one was just for CD, but there are a few in the ci.yml that need changing too |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
Still doesn't work. The module creation failed: And interestingly this didn't fail the job, which it probably should. |
|
Give it another go @aidanheerdegen - I've fixed the bug in |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
Got an error when I did (effectively) a no-op commit Did I need to change something else @CodeGat? |
|
Looking into this now |
|
The culprit was a unfixed rebase file conflict in the python file, see ACCESS-NRI/build-cd@bc86b64 @aidanheerdegen 😬 |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
It succeeded, but I found a bug here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-TEST/actions/runs/16766276125/job/47471875752?pr=53#step:18:64 - looking for the |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
Bugger, issue with the modulefiles still? https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-TEST/actions/runs/16768500298/job/47478420175?pr=53#step:16:358 |
|
The problem is one of conception (design). To be clear, my conception and my design. I thought it would be a good idea to put all of the module files under a shared namespace, but the way I'd suggested doing it used the module file name as a directory. So trying to use a path as a file and a directory. |
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
🚀 Attempted to deploy 🖥️
|
|
Rejigged the |
Just testing the updated module projections
🚀 The latest prerelease
access-test/pr53-6at 9161832 is here: #53 (comment) 🚀