Tabulation of poor

statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.

selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00

1
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

2
 Tabulation of poor hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

3
non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

Marié(e) 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

m~e

Marié(e) 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

p~e

Autres sta~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

Supérieur 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

hcl_age

Moins de 2~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

25 Ã 39 ans 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

40 Ã 59 ans 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

60 ans et ~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

Non occupe 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

4
 Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02

5
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00

6
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
7. THIES 445 122 567
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
9. FATICK 297 158 455
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
11. MATAM 248 160 408
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
Total 4762 2358 7120

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre

7
 Tabulation of region poor
statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00

First row has frequencies and second row has row percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
19.91 2.42 14.12

8
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies and second row has column percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567

9
 78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00

10
 9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96

11
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480

12
 68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00

13
 6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74

14
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455

15
 65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00

16
 6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39

17
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432

18
 50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00

19
 4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07

20
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408

21
 60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00

22
 5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73

23
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

statut de pauvrete selon Le sexe du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. Total

24
 Homm Femme
e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

statut de pauvrete selon Le statut matrimonial du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts

25
 monog polyga
ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

26
 Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

27
1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73

28
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
statut de pauvrete selon ménage
l'EHCVM 0. 1. Total

29
 Homm Femme
e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

statut de pauvrete selon Le statut matrimonial du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts

30
 monog polyga
ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

31
 Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

32
1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00

33
 5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

statut de pauvrete selon Le sexe du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage

34
 0. 1. Total
Homm Femme
e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

statut de pauvrete selon Le statut matrimonial du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres

35
 ©(e) ©(e) statuts
monog polyga
ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

36
Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

37
hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35

38
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452

39
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452

40
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

41
poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

42
3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03
occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452

43
 48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231

44
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231

45
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

46
poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

47
3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03
occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07

48
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221

49
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221

50
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

51
Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

52
2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00

53
 5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e

54
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me

55
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

56
 Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

57
1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73

58
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

statut de pauvrete selon Le sexe du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. Total

59
 Homm Femme
e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

statut de pauvrete selon Le statut matrimonial du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts

60
 monog polyga
ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

61
 Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

62
1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00

63
 5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

statut de pauvrete selon Le sexe du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage

64
 0. 1. Total
Homm Femme
e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

statut de pauvrete selon Le statut matrimonial du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres

65
 ©(e) ©(e) statuts
monog polyga
ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

66
Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

67
hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00

68
 6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de

69
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221

70
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

71
Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

72
2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432

73
 47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

statut de pauvrete selon Milieu de résidence

74
 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80

75
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

76
Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452
Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

77
3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75
Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12

78
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu

79
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231

80
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

81
 Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

82
2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84

83
 Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

84
 Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00

85
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

86
 Tabulation of poor hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

87
1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452

88
 Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00

89
 4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452

90
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452

91
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

92
poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

93
3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03
occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00

94
 4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07

95
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408

96
 60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00

97
 5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73

98
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432

99
 57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00

100
 5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07

101
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452

102
 48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00

103
 4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35

104
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408

105
 49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00

106
 4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73

107
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120

108
 66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00

109
 100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

110
First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

111
First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

112
First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

statut de pauvrete selon Le sexe du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. Total
Homm Femme
e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12

113
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

statut de pauvrete selon Le statut matrimonial du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
monog polyga
ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19

114
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

115
0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

116
 Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model
Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00

117
 5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e

118
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me

119
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

120
 Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

121
1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455

122
 65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87

123
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452

124
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Multiple/joint correspondence analysis Number of obs = 452

Total inertia = .05996964
Method: Burt/adjusted inertias Number of axes = 2

Principal Cumul.

Dimension inertia Percent percent

Dim 1 0.033 55.190 55.190

Dim 2 0.010 16.780 71.970

125
Dim 3 0.001 2.040 74.020

Dim 4 0.001 1.120 75.130

Dim 5 0.000 0.250 75.390

Total 0.060 100.000

Statistics for column categories in standard normalization

Overall Dimension_1 Dimension_2

Categories Mass Quality %inert Coord Sqcorr Contrib Coord Sqcorr

poor

0 non pauvre 0.070 0.765 0.045 0.594 0.301 0.025 1.338 0.46

1 pauvre 0.073 0.765 0.043 -0.568 0.301 0.024 -1.280 0.46

milieu

0 Urbain 0.075 0.828 0.053 0.873 0.594 0.057 0.992 0.23

1 Rural 0.068 0.828 0.058 -0.954 0.594 0.062 -1.083 0.23

hmatstat

0 0.075 0.744 0.040 -0.766 0.599 0.044 0.686 0.14

Marié(e)~e

1 0.041 0.782 0.018 -0.472 0.288 0.009 -1.123 0.49

Marié(e)~e

2 Autres s~s 0.027 0.736 0.164 2.855 0.735 0.219 -0.175 0.00

hinstruc

0 Aucun 0.103 0.658 0.014 0.020 0.002 0.000 -0.734 0.65

1 Primaire 0.022 0.332 0.014 0.100 0.009 0.000 1.115 0.32

2 Secondaire 0.012 0.394 0.016 -0.085 0.003 0.000 1.766 0.39

3 0.006 0.782 0.034 -0.538 0.029 0.002 5.004 0.75

Supérieur

hcl_age

0 Moins de~s 0.002 0.213 0.016 1.477 0.139 0.004 1.954 0.07

1 25 Ã 39 ~s 0.033 0.791 0.030 -0.553 0.184 0.010 1.821 0.60

2 40 Ã 59 ~s 0.067 0.483 0.019 -0.495 0.477 0.016 -0.101 0.00

126
3 60 ans e~s 0.041 0.657 0.067 1.168 0.465 0.056 -1.357 0.19

hgender

0 Homme 0.114 0.732 0.041 -0.689 0.731 0.054 0.060 0.00

1 Femme 0.029 0.732 0.163 2.735 0.731 0.215 -0.238 0.00

hactiv12m

1 Occupe 0.117 0.781 0.025 -0.533 0.727 0.033 0.266 0.05

2 Trav fam 0.003 0.193 0.013 -0.047 0.000 0.000 -2.253 0.19

3 Non 0.023 0.769 0.127 2.708 0.734 0.169 -1.068 0.03

occupe

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07

127
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural

128
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

Le sexe du chef de
ménage
0. 1. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Homm Femme
l'EHCVM e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

129
 Tabulation of poor hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

Le statut matrimonial du chef de
ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
statut de pauvrete selon monog polyga
l'EHCVM ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

130
 Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 117
Pearson chi2(104) = 93.74
Prob > chi2 = 0.7547

Goodness-of-fit test after logistic model

Variable: poor
Number of observations = 452
Number of covariate patterns = 12
Pearson chi2(7) = 7.84
Prob > chi2 = 0.3472

Tabulation of region poor

statut de pauvrete selon
l'EHCVM
non pauvre Total
Region de residence pauvre
1. DAKAR 948 57 1005
94.33 5.67 100.00
19.91 2.42 14.12
2. ZIGUINCHOR 294 174 468
62.82 37.18 100.00
6.17 7.38 6.57
3. DIOURBEL 393 159 552
71.20 28.80 100.00
8.25 6.74 7.75
4. SAINT-LOUIS 371 132 503
73.76 26.24 100.00
7.79 5.60 7.06
5. TAMBACOUNDA 205 227 432
47.45 52.55 100.00
4.30 9.63 6.07
6. KAOLACK 344 182 526
65.40 34.60 100.00
7.22 7.72 7.39
7. THIES 445 122 567
78.48 21.52 100.00
9.34 5.17 7.96
8. LOUGA 327 153 480
68.13 31.87 100.00
6.87 6.49 6.74
9. FATICK 297 158 455
65.27 34.73 100.00
6.24 6.70 6.39
10. KOLDA 220 212 432
50.93 49.07 100.00
4.62 8.99 6.07
11. MATAM 248 160 408
60.78 39.22 100.00
5.21 6.79 5.73
12. KAFFRINE 248 184 432
57.41 42.59 100.00
5.21 7.80 6.07

131
13. KEDOUGOU 221 231 452
48.89 51.11 100.00
4.64 9.80 6.35
14. SEDHIOU 201 207 408
49.26 50.74 100.00
4.22 8.78 5.73
Total 4762 2358 7120
66.88 33.12 100.00
100.00 100.00 100.00

First row has frequencies; second row has row percentages and third row has column
percentages

Tabulation of poor
statut de pauvrete Freq. Percent Cum.
selon l'EHCVM
non pauvre 221 48.89 48.89
pauvre 231 51.11 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of milieu
Milieu de Freq. Percent Cum.
résidence
0. Urbain 236 52.21 52.21
1. Rural 216 47.79 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor milieu

Milieu de résidence
statut de pauvrete selon 0. 1. Total
l'EHCVM Urbain Rural
0. non pauvre 153 68 221
1. pauvre 83 148 231
Total 236 216 452
Pearson Chi2 = 50.20 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of hgender
Le sexe du Freq. Percent Cum.
chef de
ménage
0. Homme 361 79.87 79.87
1. Femme 91 20.13 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hgender

statut de pauvrete selon Le sexe du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. Total
Homm Femme
e
0. non pauvre 165 56 221

132
1. pauvre 196 35 231
Total 361 91 452
Pearson Chi2 = 7.29 Prob = 0.0069

Tabulation of hcl_age
La classe d'âge du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
Moins de 24 ans 6 1.33 1.33
25 Ã 39 ans 103 22.79 24.12
40 Ã 59 ans 212 46.90 71.02
60 ans et plus 131 28.98 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hcl_age

La classe d'âge du chef de ménage
Moins 25 Ã 40 Ã 60 ans Total
statut de pauvrete selon de 24 39 ans 59 ans et plus
l'EHCVM ans
0. non pauvre 2 56 104 59 221
1. pauvre 4 47 108 72 231
Total 6 103 212 131 452
Pearson Chi2 = 2.60 Prob = 0.4577

Tabulation of hinstruc
Le niveau d'instruction Freq. Percent Cum.
du chef de ménage
0. Aucun 326 72.12 72.12
1. Primaire 69 15.27 87.39
2. Secondaire 38 8.41 95.80
3. Supérieur 19 4.20 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hinstruc

Le niveau d'instruction du chef de ménage
0. 1. 2. 3. Total
statut de pauvrete selon Aucun Primair Second Supé
l'EHCVM e aire rieur
0. non pauvre 140 39 25 17 221
1. pauvre 186 30 13 2 231
Total 326 69 38 19 452
Pearson Chi2 = 23.09 Prob = 0.0000

Tabulation of poor hmatstat

statut de pauvrete selon Le statut matrimonial du chef de
l'EHCVM ménage
0. 1. 2. Total
Marià Marià Autres
©(e) ©(e) statuts
monog polyga
ame me
0. non pauvre 118 49 54 221

133
1. pauvre 118 82 31 231
Total 236 131 85 452
Pearson Chi2 = 14.32 Prob = 0.0008

Tabulation of hmatstat
Le statut matrimonial du chef de Freq. Percent Cum.
ménage
0. Marié(e) monogame 236 52.21 52.21
1. Marié(e) polygame 131 28.98 81.19
2. Autres statuts 85 18.81 100.00
Total 452 100.00

Tabulation of poor hactiv12m

Activite 12 mois du CM
statut de pauvrete selon 1. 2. Trav. 3. Non Total
l'EHCVM Occupe fam. occupe
0. non pauvre 180 2 39 221
1. pauvre 190 7 34 231
Total 370 9 73 452
Pearson Chi2 = 3.17 Prob = 0.2049

Tabulation of hactiv12m
Activite 12 mois du CM Freq. Percent Cum.
1. Occupe 370 81.86 81.86
2. Trav. fam. 9 1.99 83.85
3. Non occupe 73 16.15 100.00
Total 452 100.00

134