Département : Génie Urbain et Environnement (GUE)

Filière : CDEE

COMTE RENDUE : TP PHOTOVOLTAIQUE

Réalisé par :

BOUITA SAAD
BAZI MOHAMMED AMINE
BRIRDA ACHRAF

Encadré par : Pr O. MOUHAT

Etablissement : Ecole Supérieure de Technologie de Sale

(ESTS)

Année universitaire : 2023-2024

 MANIPE1 : Panneaux photovoltaïques

Introduction :

Les panneaux photovoltaïques sont des dispositifs qui convertissent l'énergie lumineuse
du soleil en électricité utilisable. Cette technologie repose sur l'effet photovoltaïque, un
phénomène découvert par le physicien français Alexandre-Edmond Becquerel en 1839.
Les panneaux sont composés de cellules photovoltaïques, généralement fabriquées en
silicium, un matériau semi-conducteur.

Manipulation :
Les composantes principales de ces manipes sont :

Panneaux solaires
Onduleur
Suiveur solaire
Câblage électrique
Batterie solaire
Régulateur de charge
 Exploitation des résultats :

Module inferieur :
R (𝜴) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
I(A) 5,2 3,3 2,1 1,2 0,9 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,5 0,4
U(v) 0,4 16,4 17,6 18 18,8 19 19,1 19,2 19,3 19,2 19,3
P(v) 2,08 54,12 37,38 22,32 16,92 13,3 11,46 9,6 7,72 9,6 7,72

I=f(U)
1.6

1.4

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0.5 7.7 8.3 12 14.7 16.2 16.9 17.2 17.4 17.5 17.6

P=f(I)
140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
0.7 1.5 1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3
 Deux Modules relient en série :
R (𝜴) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

I(A) 1.2 1 0.9 1 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8

U(v) 5.2 9.4 12.4 14.5 15.5 17 19.6 20.9 14.4 26.2 28..2

P(v) 1.8 9.4 11.16 14.5 12.4 10.2 11.76 13.74 14.64 15.72 14.02

I=f(U)
1.6

1.4

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0.5 7.7 8.3 12 14.7 16.2 16.9 17.2 17.4 17.5 17.6

P=f(I)
140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
0.7 1.5 1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3
 Deux modules réels en parallèles :
R (𝜴) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

I(A) 2.7 1.6 1.2 1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3

U(v) 0.5 7.7 11.6 16.8 17.4 17.7 17.9 18 18.1 18.1 18.2

P(v) 1.35 12.32 13.8 16.8 13.92 12.39 10.74 7.2 7.24 5.43 5.46

I=f(U)
1.6

1.4

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0.5 7.7 8.3 12 14.7 16.2 16.9 17.2 17.4 17.5 17.6

P=f(I)
140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
0.7 1.5 1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3
Module inferieur avec bande obscure :

R (𝜴) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

I(A) 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1

U(v) 0.2 6.4 7.6 8 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.5 9.1 9.9

P(v) 0.28 7.68 6.48 3.2 2.43 2.49 1.66 0.84 1.7 1.82 0.99

P=f(I)
140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
0.7 1.5 1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3

I=f(U)
1.6

1.4

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0.5 7.7 8.3 12 14.7 16.2 16.9 17.2 17.4 17.5 17.6
 Deux modules relient en parallèles avec deux bandes du modules inferieur
obscurée :
R (𝜴) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

I(A) 0.7 1.5 1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3

U(v) 0.5 7.7 8.3 12 14.7 16.2 16.9 17.2 17.4 17.5 17.6

P(v) 1.35 115.5 8.3 8.4 117.76 9.72 10.14 8.6 6.96 7 5.28

I=f(U)
1.6

1.4

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0.5 7.7 8.3 12 14.7 16.2 16.9 17.2 17.4 17.5 17.6

P=f(I)
140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
0.7 1.5 1 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3
 PE V1 V2 V3 A1 A2 A3 V I P
Lampe V V V A A A V A W
1 1 11,8 9,8 11,5 1,2 2,8 7,5 5,16 -17,67
2 12,3 12 11,7 1 -1,8 0 12 -0,26 -3
3 12,3 12 11,8 1 -1,8 0 12,03 -0,26 -3
4 12,9 11,9 11 1 1,4 3,3 11,93 1,9 22
5 12,2 12 11,7 1 -1,9 0 11,69 -0,3 -3,97
 MANIPE2 : logiciel pvSyst

Introduction :

Le programme PVSyst est un logiciel de simulation des systèmes photovoltaïques,

développé initialement par le Groupe de Physique Appliquée (GAP) de l’Université de
Genève. Ce projet, associant le GAP et le Laboratoire d’Énergie Solaire de l’EPFL
(LESO-PB), a eu pour but de rendre ce logiciel, dont les qualités scientifiques sont
largement reconnues, plus aisé à utiliser et donc accessible à un large public
(architectes, installateurs PV, étudiants...).
 Version 7.4.6

PVsyst TRIAL
PVsyst - Simulation report
Pumping PV System

Project: Nouveau Projet

Variant: Nouvelle variante de simulation
Pumping PV System
System power: 560 Wp

PVsyst TRIAL Dar Gfafit Med - Maroc

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
Author

PVsyst TRIAL
 Project: Nouveau Projet
Variant: Nouvelle variante de simulation

PVsyst V7.4.6
VC0, Simulation date:
04/27/24 12:05

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Project summary
Geographical Site Situation Project settings
Dar Gfafit Med Latitude 34.20 °N Albedo 0.20
Maroc Longitude -6.63 °W
Altitude 35 m
Time zone UTC

Weather data
Dar Gfafit Med
Meteonorm 8.1 (1996-2015), Sat=100 % - Synthétique

System summary

PVsyst TRIAL
Pumping PV System Deep Well to Storage

PV Field Orientation Water needs

Fixed plane Yearly constant 7.00 m³/day
Tilt/Azimuth 34 / 180 °

System information
PV Array
Nb. of modules 8 units
Pnom total 560 Wp

Results summary
Water Energy Efficiencies
Water Pumped 11 m³ Energy At Pump 42 kWh System efficiency 7.3 %
Specific 4 m³/kWp/bar Specific 3.75 kWh/m³ Pump efficiency 3.7 %

PVsyst TRIAL
Water needs
Missing Water
2555
99.6

Project and results summary

m³
%
Unused (tank full)
Unused PV energy
Unused Fraction

Table of contents
0 kWh
0.0 %

2
General parameters, PV Array Characteristics, System losses 3
Main results 4
Loss diagram 5
Predef. graphs 6

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 2/6
 Project: Nouveau Projet
Variant: Nouvelle variante de simulation

PVsyst V7.4.6
VC0, Simulation date:
04/27/24 12:05

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

General parameters
Pumping PV System Deep Well to Storage

System Requirements Well characteristics Storage tank

Basic Head 50 meterW Static level depth -30 m Volume 24.0 m³
Water needs Specific drawdown -0.06 m/m³/h Diameter 3.5 m
Yearly constant 7.00 m³/day Diameter 30 cm Feeding by top
Pump level -40 m Feeding altitude 20.0 m
Lower dynamic level -35 m Height (full level) 2.5 m

Hydraulic circuit PV Field Orientation

Piping length 100 m Fixed plane
Pipes PE25 Tilt/Azimuth 34 / 180 °

PVsyst TRIAL
Dint 29 mm

PV Array and Pump

PV module Pump
Manufacturer Generic Manufacturer Generic
Model Poly 70 Wp 36 cells Model PS20-HR-04
(Original PVsyst database) Pump Technology Progressive cavity
Unit Nom. Power 70 Wp Deep well pump
Number of PV modules 8 units Motor DC motor, brushless
Nominal (STC) 560 Wp Operating conditions
Modules 2 string x 4 In series
Head min. Head Nom Head max.
At operating cond. (50°C)
Pmpp 504 Wp 5.0 40.0 56.0 m
U mpp 62 V Corresp. Flowrate 0.66 0.52 0.41 m³/h

PVsyst TRIAL
I mpp 8.1 A Req. power 55 125 140 W

Total PV power
Nominal (STC) 0.560 kWp Number of pumps
Total 8 modules pumps 2 in parallel
Control device
Model Generic device (optimised for the system)
System Configuration Direct, pumps cascading

Pumping system controller

System Operating Control
Generic device params adjusted acc. to the system
Direct coupling between the PV array and pumps:
2 pumps started in cascade
Irradiance threshold for starting the second pump 0 W/m²

PVsyst TRIAL
Thermal Loss factor
Module temperature according to irradiance
Uc (const)
Uv (wind)
20.0 W/m²K
0.0 W/m²K/m/s
DC wiring losses
Global array res.
Loss Fraction
System losses

129 mΩ
1.5 % at STC
Module Quality Loss
Loss Fraction -0.8 %

Module mismatch losses Strings Mismatch loss

Loss Fraction 2.0 % at MPP Loss Fraction 0.1 %

IAM loss factor

Incidence effect (IAM): Fresnel smooth glass, n = 1.526

0° 30° 50° 60° 70° 75° 80° 85° 90°

1.000 0.998 0.981 0.948 0.862 0.776 0.636 0.403 0.000

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 3/6
 Project: Nouveau Projet
Variant: Nouvelle variante de simulation

PVsyst V7.4.6
VC0, Simulation date:
04/27/24 12:05

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Main results
System Production
Water Energy Efficiencies
Water Pumped 11 m³ Energy At Pump 42 kWh System efficiency 7.3 %
Specific 4 m³/kWp/bar Specific 3.75 kWh/m³ Pump efficiency 3.7 %
Water needs 2555 m³ Unused (tank full)
Missing Water 99.6 % Unused PV energy 0 kWh
Unused Fraction 0.0 %

Normalized productions (per installed kWp) Performance Ratio PR

PVsyst TRIAL
Balances and main results

PVsyst TRIAL
January
February
March
April
GlobEff
kWh/m²
22.7
33.6
73.2
124.5
EArrMPP
kWh
11.83
17.78
38.68
65.02
E_PmpOp
kWh
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ETkFull
kWh
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
H_Pump
meterW
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WPumped
m³
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
W_Used
m³
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
W_Miss
m³
205.0
196.0
217.0
210.0
May 169.8 86.68 10.50 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 217.0
June 185.9 93.55 17.32 0.000 50.81 6.924 6.92 203.1
July 182.2 91.26 13.30 0.000 50.80 4.323 4.32 212.7
August 147.3 74.30 1.08 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 217.0
September 90.4 46.37 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 210.0
October 48.8 25.23 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 217.0
November 24.9 12.87 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 210.0

PVsyst TRIAL
December 21.8 11.29 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 217.0
Year 1125.0 574.85 42.20 0.000 50.81 11.247 23.25 2531.8

Legends
GlobEff Effective Global, corr. for IAM and shadings WPumped Water volume pumped
EArrMPP Array virtual energy at MPP W_Used Water drawn by the user
E_PmpOp Pump operating energy W_Miss Missing water
ETkFull Unused energy (tank full)
H_Pump Average total Head at pump

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 4/6
 Project: Nouveau Projet
Variant: Nouvelle variante de simulation

PVsyst V7.4.6
VC0, Simulation date:
04/27/24 12:05

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Loss diagram
1871 kWh/m² Global horizontal irradiation

-35.03% Global incident in coll. plane

-7.43% IAM factor on global

1125 kWh/m² * 4 m² coll. Effective irradiation on collectors

efficiency at STC = 13.58% PV conversion

PVsyst TRIAL
631 kWh Array nominal energy (at STC effic.)
-1.39% PV loss due to irradiance level

-5.69% PV loss due to temperature

+0.75% Module quality loss

-2.05% Mismatch loss, modules and strings

-0.68% Ohmic wiring loss
575 kWh Array virtual energy at MPP
-0.06% Loss with respect to the MPP running

-16.32% En. under pump starting threshold

PVsyst TRIAL
42 kWh
-99.12% En. under pump producing threshold

Electrical losses (Mismatch, thresholds, overload)

0.00% Energy under drawdown limit

0.00% Unused energy (tank full)
42 kWh Operating electrical energy at pump
2 kWh Pump efficiency = 3.7% Hydraulic energy at pump

PVsyst TRIAL
50 meterW Static head requirement (no flow)

-0.11% Well: drawdown head loss

-1.48% Friction head loss
11 m³ Aver. Head = 50.8 meterW Water volume pumped
+106.70% Stored water balancebegin/end of interval

Missing: 2532 m³ 23 m³ supplied (0.9%of needs) User's water needs

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 5/6
 Project: Nouveau Projet
Variant: Nouvelle variante de simulation

PVsyst V7.4.6
VC0, Simulation date:
04/27/24 12:05

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Predef. graphs
Diagramme d'entrée/sortie journalier

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 6/6
 Version 7.4.6

PVsyst TRIALPVsyst - Simulation report

Standalone system

Project: PROJET CDEE

Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly undersized
Standalone system with batteries
System power: 12.75 kWp

PVsyst TRIAL Casablanca - Morocco

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
Author

PVsyst TRIAL
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Project summary
Geographical Site Situation Project settings
Casablanca Latitude 33.59 °N Albedo 0.20
Morocco Longitude -7.61 °W
Altitude 28 m
Time zone UTC

Weather data
Casablanca
Meteonorm 8.1 (1996-2015) - Synthétique

System summary

PVsyst TRIAL
Standalone system Standalone system with batteries

PV Field Orientation User's needs

Fixed plane Daily household consumers
Tilt/Azimuth 34 / 180 ° Monthly Specifications
Average 170 kWh/Day

System information
PV Array Battery pack
Nb. of modules 51 units Technology Lead-acid, sealed, Gel
Pnom total 12.75 kWp Nb. of units 100 units
Voltage 24 V
Capacity 8000 Ah

Results summary

PVsyst TRIAL
Useful energy from solar 5659.67 kWh/year
Missing Energy
Excess (unused)
56430.89 kWh/year
5754.50 kWh/year

Project and results summary

Specific production 444 kWh/kWp/year Perf. Ratio PR
Available solar energy 12855.95 kWh/year

Table of contents
Solar Fraction SF
35.88 %
9.12 %

2
General parameters, PV Array Characteristics, System losses 3
Detailed User's needs 4
Main results 7
Loss diagram 8
Predef. graphs 9

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 2/9
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

General parameters
Standalone system Standalone system with batteries

PV Field Orientation
Orientation Sheds configuration Models used
Fixed plane No 3D scene defined Transposition Perez
Tilt/Azimuth 34 / 180 ° Diffuse Perez, Meteonorm
Circumsolar separate

User's needs
Daily household consumers
Monthly Specifications
Average 170 kWh/Day

PVsyst TRIAL
PV module
Manufacturer
Model
(Original PVsyst database)
Unit Nom. Power 250 Wp
PV Array Characteristics

Generic
Poly 250 Wp 60 cells
Battery
Manufacturer
Model
Technology
Nb. of units
Generic
Solar 12V / 160 Ah
Lead-acid, sealed, Gel
50 in parallel x 2 in series
Number of PV modules 51 units Discharging min. SOC 20.0 %
Nominal (STC) 12.75 kWp Stored energy 153.6 kWh
Modules 17 string x 3 In series Battery Pack Characteristics
At operating cond. (50°C) Voltage 24 V
Pmpp 11.54 kWp Nominal Capacity 8000 Ah (C10)
U mpp 83 V Temperature Fixed 20 °C
I mpp 139 A

PVsyst TRIAL
Controller
Universal controller
Technology
Temp coeff.
Converter
Maxi and EURO efficiencies
MPPT converter
-5.0 mV/°C/Elem.

96.0 / 94.0 %
Battery Management control
Threshold commands as
Charging
approx.
Discharging
approx.
SOC calculation
SOC = 0.90 / 0.75
26.2 / 24.8 V
SOC = 0.20 / 0.45
23.1 / 24.1 V

Total PV power
Nominal (STC) 13 kWp
Total 51 modules
Module area 83.0 m²
Cell area 74.4 m²

Array losses

PVsyst TRIAL
Array Soiling Losses
Loss Fraction

Serie Diode Loss

Voltage drop
3.0 %

0.7 V
Thermal Loss factor
Module temperature according to irradiance
Uc (const)
Uv (wind)

Module Quality Loss

Loss Fraction
29.0 W/m²K
0.0 W/m²K/m/s

-0.8 %
DC wiring losses
Global array res.
Loss Fraction

Module mismatch losses

Loss Fraction
10.0 mΩ
1.5 % at STC

1.0 % at MPP
Loss Fraction 0.8 % at STC

IAM loss factor

Incidence effect (IAM): Fresnel smooth glass, n = 1.526

0° 30° 50° 60° 70° 75° 80° 85° 90°

1.000 0.998 0.981 0.948 0.862 0.776 0.636 0.403 0.000

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 3/9
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 4/9
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Detailed User's needs

Daily household consumers, Monthly Specifications, average = 170 kWh/day
January and February

Nb. Power Use Energy Nb. Power Use Energy

W Hour/day Wh/day W Hour/day Wh/day
Lamps (LED or fluo) 8 98/lamp 14.0 10976 6 18/lamp 6.0 648
TV / PC / Mobile 2 120/app 14.0 3360 1 75/app 6.0 450
SPOT IDURE METALLIQUE 10 75/app 6.5 4875 1 200/app 1.0 200
Fridge / Deep-freeze 2 24 600 1 24 1001
MACHINE A LAVER 1 2 5000
FOUR 2 2000 tot 1.0 4000

PVsyst TRIAL
Stand-by consumers 24.0 144 24.0 144
Total daily energy 28955 2443

March and April

Nb. Power Use Energy Nb. Power Use Energy

W Hour/day Wh/day W Hour/day Wh/day
Lamps (LED or fluo) 8 18/lamp 6.0 864
TV / PC / Mobile 4 120/app 12.5 6000
Domestic appliances 1 200/app 1.0 200
Fridge / Deep-freeze 1 24 151
LE FOUR 2 1 4000
LAMPES 7 60 tot 7.0 2940
Stand-by consumers 24.0 144

PVsyst TRIAL
Total daily energy 14299 0

May and June

Nb. Power Use Energy Nb. Power Use Energy

W Hour/day Wh/day W Hour/day Wh/day
Lampes (LED ou fluo) 8 98/lamp 14.0 10976
TV / PC / Mobile 2 1200/app 14.0 33600
Appareils domestiques 10 75/app 6.5 4875
Frigo / Congélateur 2 24 600000
Machines à laver linge/vaisselle 1 2 5000
Autres utilisations 1 2000 tot 1.0 2000
Consomm. de veille 24.0 144
Total daily energy 0 656595

PVsyst TRIAL
Lamps (LED or fluo)
TV / PC / Mobile
Nb.

8
2
Power
W
98/lamp
1200/app
July and August

Use
Hour/day
14.0
14.0
Energy
Wh/day
10976
33600
Nb.

8
2
Power
W
98/lamp
1200/app
Use
Hour/day
14.0
14.0
Energy
Wh/day
10976
33600
SPOT IDURE METALLIQUE 10 75/app 6.5 4875 10 75/app 6.5 4875
Fridge / Deep-freeze 2 24 600000 2 24 600000
MACHINE A LAVER 1 2 5000 1 2 5000
FOUR 1 2000 tot 1.0 2000 1 2000 tot 1.0 2000
Stand-by consumers 24.0 144 24.0 144
Total daily energy 656595 656595

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 5/9
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Detailed User's needs

September and October

Nb. Power Use Energy Nb. Power Use Energy

W Hour/day Wh/day W Hour/day Wh/day
Lamps (LED or fluo) 6 18/lamp 5.0 540 6 18/lamp 5.0 540
TV / PC / Mobile 1 75/app 4.0 300 1 75/app 4.0 300
Domestic appliances 1 200/app 1.0 200 1 200/app 1.0 200
Fridge / Deep-freeze 1 24 1001 1 24 1001
Stand-by consumers 24.0 144 24.0 144
Total daily energy 2185 2185

PVsyst TRIAL
November and December

Nb. Power Use Energy Nb. Power Use Energy

W Hour/day Wh/day W Hour/day Wh/day
Lamps (LED or fluo) 6 18/lamp 5.0 540 6 18/lamp 6.0 648
TV / PC / Mobile 1 75/app 4.0 300 1 75/app 6.0 450
Domestic appliances 1 200/app 1.0 200 1 200/app 1.0 200
Fridge / Deep-freeze 1 24 1001 1 24 1001
Stand-by consumers 24.0 144 24.0 144
Total daily energy 2185 2443

Hourly distribution

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 6/9
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Main results
System Production
Useful energy from solar 5659.67 kWh/year Perf. Ratio PR 35.88 %
Available solar energy 12855.95 kWh/year Solar Fraction SF 9.12 %
Excess (unused) 5754.50 kWh/year
Loss of Load Battery aging (State of Wear)
Time Fraction 0.4 % Cycles SOW 98.3 %
Missing Energy 56430.89 kWh/year Static SOW 90.0 %

Normalized productions (per installed kWp) Performance Ratio PR

PVsyst TRIAL
Balances and main results

PVsyst TRIAL
January
February
March
April
GlobHor
kWh/m²
88.3
109.8
156.2
188.3
GlobEff
kWh/m²
22.4
35.5
74.8
119.6
E_Avail
kWh
221
401
884
1458
EUnused
kWh
0
185
420
1437
E_Miss
kWh
618
8
0
0
E_User
kWh
280
60
443
0
E_Load
kWh
898
68
443
0
SolFrac
ratio
0.311
0.880
1.000
0.000
May 222.3 171.5 2061 2057 0 0 0 0.000
June 219.6 179.9 2045 0 17967 1731 19698 0.088
July 224.0 178.4 2013 0 18760 1595 20354 0.078
August 205.8 144.2 1625 0 19075 1279 20354 0.063
September 168.4 90.5 1065 829 3 63 66 0.961
October 130.5 48.1 560 480 0 68 68 1.000
November 92.2 26.5 296 214 0 66 66 1.000

PVsyst TRIAL
December 77.1 21.3 226 132 0 76 76 1.000
Year 1882.5 1112.7 12856 5754 56431 5660 62091 0.091

Legends
GlobHor Global horizontal irradiation E_User Energy supplied to the user
GlobEff Effective Global, corr. for IAM and shadings E_Load Energy need of the user (Load)
E_Avail Available Solar Energy SolFrac Solar fraction (EUsed / ELoad)
EUnused Unused energy (battery full)
E_Miss Missing energy

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 7/9
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Loss diagram
1883 kWh/m² Global horizontal irradiation

-34.27% Global incident in coll. plane

-7.29% IAM factor on global

-3.00% Soiling loss factor

1113 kWh/m² * 83 m² coll. Effective irradiation on collectors

PVsyst TRIAL
efficiency at STC = 15.46% PV conversion

14269 kWh Array nominal energy (at STC effic.)

-1.51% PV loss due to irradiance level

-3.34% PV loss due to temperature

+0.75% Module quality loss

-1.00% Module array mismatch loss

-1.44% Ohmic wiring loss

-43.10% Unused energy (battery full)

PVsyst TRIAL
Missing energy
7598 kWh

-6.49%

-0.06%
0.00%
Effective energy at the output of the array

Converter Loss during operation (efficiency)

Converter Loss due to power threshold

Converter Loss over nominal conv. voltage
0.00% Converter Loss due to voltage threshold
90.88%
7101 kWh Converter losses (effic, overload)
Battery Storage
Direct use -0.97% Battery Stored Energy balance
13.1%
-16.40% Battery efficiency loss

PVsyst TRIAL
Stored
86.9% -2.07% Charge/Disch. Current Efficiency Loss
-0.95% Gassing Current (electrolyte dissociation)
-0.75% Battery Self-discharge Current
5660 kWh Energy from the sun
56431 kWh 5660 kWh Energy supplied to the user

62091 kWh Energy need of the user (Load)

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 8/9
 Project: PROJET CDEE
Variant: DEMO - Dakar Stand-alone, 2.2 kWh/day, 480 Wp, slightly
undersized
PVsyst V7.4.6
VC4, Simulation date:
04/27/24 11:39

PVsyst TRIAL
with V7.4.6

Predef. graphs
Diagramme d'entrée/sortie journalier

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL

PVsyst TRIAL
04/27/24 PVsyst Evaluation mode Page 9/9
Conclusion :

Le logiciel PVsyst est très utile pour les professionnels du photovoltaïque car il peut
leur aider à prendre des décisions éclairées. Les professionnels peuvent utiliser le
logiciel pour évaluer les différentes options disponibles pour leur système
photovoltaïque. Par exemple, ils peuvent déterminer le nombre et le type
d’équipements nécessaires pour leur système, leur emplacement et le type d’énergie
produite. Le logiciel peut également être utilisé pour estimer le coût de construction et
d’exploitation du système et pour prévoir le rendement des panneaux photovoltaïques.