Modèle Excel D - Évaluation Des Risques
Modèle Excel D - Évaluation Des Risques
Traductions
1. Paramètres
1.1. Traductions
identifiant Description des risques Phase critique Catégorie de risque Cause du risque Conséquence du risque Type de risque Impact financier estimé Responsable
1 Lack of Monitoring and Control Elaboration Processes Internal Complete and Complex Schedules developed but not controlled Lack of systematic follow-up Negative 85,693.00 John
2 Lack of Planning Sessions with the Team Elaboration Processes Internal Start the project without everyone involved understanding their role The project will face numerous obstacles to its execution Negative 59,747.00 William
3 Project Manager by accident Pre-Project Project Management Failure to hire a Project Manager who is a leader and has knowledge Lack of leadership and recognition by the parties involved Negative 15,308.00 Dam
4 Lack of General Support for Project Culture Pre-Project Project Management Lack of project management methodology Weak control and management Negative 13,008.00 Carl
5 No Risk Management Benchmarking Project Management Lack of risk management Project negatively impacted Negative 42,617.00 Mike
6 Unrealistic Estimates Pre-Project Internal Wrong measurement of project costs Incoherent Value Information Negative 19,035.00 John
7 Little Sponsor Management Benchmarking External Lack of follow-up by sponsors Sponsors' lack of vision of the project's progress Negative 96,004.00 John
8 Bad Communication Pre-Project Local Weak communication between involved parties Wrong decisions made that can lead to negative impacts Negative 18,790.00 William
9 Workload of the People Involved Elaboration Processes Internal Failure to distribute tasks and responsibilities to involved parties Exhausted and overworked professionals Negative 32,340.00 Dam
10 Deformation or Simply Lack of Scope Pre-Project Project Management Lack of definition of project development guidelines Control and monitoring of the project with failures Negative 8,481.00 Mike
11 Use a New Technology Benchmarking Technician Identification of a more effective technology for project development Productivity gain for the project Positive 4,500.00 John
12 Early Delivery Closing External Advance of all project deliveries Delivery before estimated time Positive 50,000.00 Mike
13 Exchange Variation Tests and Validation External Purchase of imported items with lower dollar Project cost reduction Positive 85,325.00 William
14 Donations Pre-Project External Receipt of financial donations by sponsors Increase in cash value for the project Positive 40,000.00 Dam
15 New Opportunities Elaboration Processes Internal Discovery of new unidentified opportunities Increased revenue gain Positive 35,000.00 Carl
3. Analyse
Maintenant, entrez les détails de l'analyse pour chaque risque identifié
identifiant Description des risques Probabilité Description de la probabilité % De probabilité Impact sur le coût Impact sur le temps Impact sur la portée Impact sur la qualité Degré d'exposition au risque Valeur de contingence
1 Lack of Monitoring and Control Very High 90% Very high Very high Very high Very high 0.00 0
2 Lack of Planning Sessions with the Team Low 85% Not applicable Moderate Very high Very high 0.00 0
3 Project Manager by accident Very High 70% Very high Very high Moderate Very high 0.00 0
4 Lack of General Support for Project Culture Very High 90% Very low Not applicable Very low Not applicable 0.00 0
5 No Risk Management High 70% Not applicable High Very high Very high 0.00 0
6 Unrealistic Estimates Very High 90% Very high Very high Very high Very high 0.00 0
7 Little Sponsor Management Moderate 40% Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 0.00 0
8 Bad Communication Very High 90% Moderate Not applicable Not applicable Low 0.00 0
9 Workload of the People Involved Very High 90% High Very high Very high Very high 0.00 0
10 Deformation or Simply Lack of Scope Very High 80% Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 0.00 0
11 Use a New Technology Low 15% Moderate High High High 0.00 0
12 Early Delivery Remote 5% High Very high Low Moderate 0.00 0
13 Exchange Variation High 62% Very high Low Not applicable Not applicable 0.00 0
14 Donations Remote 10% Very high Moderate Low Very low 0.00 0
15 New Opportunities Low 30% Very low Very low High Moderate 0.00 0
3. Analyse
Maintenant, entrez les détails de l'analyse pour chaque risque identifié
identifiant Description des risques Probabilité Description de la probabilité % De probabilité Impact sur le coût Impact sur le temps Impact sur la portée Impact sur la qualité Degré d'exposition au risque Valeur de contingence
3. Analyse
Maintenant, entrez les détails de l'analyse pour chaque risque identifié
identifiant Description des risques Probabilité Description de la probabilité % De probabilité Impact sur le coût Impact sur le temps Impact sur la portée Impact sur la qualité Degré d'exposition au risque Valeur de contingence
3. Analyse
Maintenant, entrez les détails de l'analyse pour chaque risque identifié
identifiant Description des risques Probabilité Description de la probabilité % De probabilité Impact sur le coût Impact sur le temps Impact sur la portée Impact sur la qualité Degré d'exposition au risque Valeur de contingence
3. Analyse
Maintenant, entrez les détails de l'analyse pour chaque risque identifié
identifiant Description des risques Probabilité Description de la probabilité % De probabilité Impact sur le coût Impact sur le temps Impact sur la portée Impact sur la qualité Degré d'exposition au risque Valeur de contingence
3. Analyse
Maintenant, entrez les détails de l'analyse pour chaque risque identifié
identifiant Description des risques Probabilité Description de la probabilité % De probabilité Impact sur le coût Impact sur le temps Impact sur la portée Impact sur la qualité Degré d'exposition au risque Valeur de contingence
4. Matrice Probabilité x Impacts
Haute
Très haut
0
0%
Haute
Modérer
0
Probabilité
Modérer
0%
Faible
Faible
0
0%
À distance
Haute
Très haut
0
0%
Haute
Modérer
0
Probabilité
Modérer
0%
Faible
Faible
0
0%
À distance
Total Qty Positive Negative Contingency Value Esta forma representa uma segm
de dados têm suporte no Excel 20
Identifiant Description des risques Propriétaire Type de risque Exposition Stratégie Chaton Action de traitement Action alternative Responsable Statut
1 Lack of Monitoring and Control John Negative Très lent Threat - Prevent Failure to receive project monitoring reports Creation of follow-ups and reports on project development Hiring an Outsourced Project Management Company Mike Active
2 Lack of Planning Sessions with the Team William Negative Très lent Threat - Prevent Failures in conducting and carrying out the project Scheduling alignment meetings between the team Mike Occurred
11 Use a New Technology John Positive Très lent Opportunity - Share Identifying the lack of resources in current technology Quotation with suppliers of the new technology in the market William Canceled
10 Deformation or Simply Lack of Scope Mike Negative Très lent Threat - Mitigate Failures in conducting and carrying out the project Re-scope the project Hiring an Outsourced Project Management Company Mike Active
15 New Opportunities Carl Positive Très lent Threat - Accept Identification of new opportunities Alignment meeting for new opportunities William Occurred
4 Lack of General Support for Project Culture Carl Negative Très lent Threat - Prevent Failures in conducting and carrying out the project Hiring project management consultancy Hiring an Outsourced Project Management Company Dam Occurred
Signaler
Probabilité x impacts
Qty Impacter
Probabilité (empty) Très lent
High 2
Low 3
Moderate 1
Remote 2
Very High 7
(empty) 975
Qty Impacter
Probabilité (empty) Très lent
High 2
Low 3
Moderate 1
Remote 2
Very High 7
(empty) 975
Data
Type de risqueQty Contingency Value
(empty) 975
Negative 10 0
Positive 5 0
Qté par catégorie Quantité par phase critique Quantité par responsable Quantité par probabilité