JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.1 CiteScore 3.5

JMIR Formative Research (JFR, ISSN 2561-326X) publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a Journal Impact Factor of 2.1 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 3.5 (2024) JMIR Formative Research is a Q2 journal in the field of Medicine (miscellaneous), according to Scopus data.

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The evolution of language models, particularly large language models, has introduced transformative potential for psychological assessment, challenging traditional rating scale methods that have dominated clinical practice for over a century.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people experience a higher number of health disparities compared to cisgender counterparts. Social determinants of health are linked to these health disparities in minority communities, including in the TGD community. Lack of social support contributes significantly to these disparities for the TGD community.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

Anxiety and depressive disorders are common and burdensome, yet many people prefer to self-manage and do not access treatment or fail to achieve meaningful improvement. Prior research indicates that the frequency of performing simple, everyday actions, namely “The Things You Do” (TYD; i.e., healthy thinking, meaningful activities, having goals and plans, healthy routines, and social connection) is strongly associated with support mental health and wellbeing. This research has been primarily quantitative in nature and so less is known about how people perceive and interpret changes in their mental health when engaging in or limiting these actions.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Many parents who use donor-assisted conception to form their families struggle with telling their children about how they came to be. To address this problem, we created the Tool to Empower Parental TeLling and TaLking or the TELL Tool, a digital, psychoeducational and decision-support intervention for parents with children aged 1 to 16 years. Recently, we completed a pilot randomized controlled trial of the TELL Tool that showed feasibility, acceptability, and promise. However, in its current version, the TELL Tool does not include content for pregnant, expecting, or new parents with children less than 1 year of age.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Uncontrolled diabetes contributes to serious comorbidities and mortality. Effective self-management can improve outcomes, though barriers such as limited education and support often prevent patients from engaging in such behaviors. Automated texting systems show promise to deliver diabetes self-management education as they are accessible and scalable. Furthermore, customizing these systems may further enhance patient engagement compared to standard, one-size-fits-all approaches. However, such customization is more resource-intensive, and it remains unclear whether the added effort meaningfully enhances diabetes self-management and outcomes.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Globally, we face a significant treatment gap in mental health care, with extensive wait times, exorbitant prices, and concerns about appropriateness for non-Western clients. Digital single-session interventions (SSIs) may offer a promising alternative. SSIs target particular mechanisms that underlie broad-ranging psychopathology, including deficits in problem-solving skills.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Methadone is a first-line treatment for opioid use disorder, which is delivered in federally regulated opioid treatment programs (OTPs). Federal policies require directly observed dosing of methadone followed by graduated provision of nonobserved doses to take at home (ie, “take-home” dosing) after demonstrated stability is achieved. Policy changes since the COVID-19 pandemic have greatly expanded take-home dosing. Video directly observed treatment (video DOT) is an approach in which patients submit videos of themselves taking medications, which are asynchronously reviewed to verify adherence.

|
Article Thumbnail
Research Letter

When given a sample of 100 emergency department discharge instructions, Claude Sonnet, a large language model, produced accurate Spanish translations as evaluated by Spanish-speaking physicians and medical interpreters.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Software solutions for wearable-based stress monitoring offer significant potential in healthcare, particularly for vulnerable populations such as individuals with dementia or persistent physical symptoms. Despite technological advances, designing user-centered, ethically grounded, and contextually relevant software remains challenging. Vulnerable populations often have specific cognitive, physical, and emotional needs that require customization, yet these are rarely prioritized in mainstream development. Our so-called Sensors2Care project addressed these challenges by co-developing stress-monitoring prototypes in collaboration with stakeholders from healthcare, law, and technology within a transdisciplinary setting.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Cardiac arrest (CA), characterized by an extremely high mortality rate, remains one of the most pressing global public health challenges. It not only causes a substantial strain on health care systems but also severely impacts individual health outcomes. Clinical evidence demonstrates that early identification of CA significantly reduced the mortality rate. However, the developed CA prediction models exhibit limitations such as low sensitivity and high false alarm rates. Moreover, issues with model generalization remain insufficiently addressed.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

Access to care that affirms their entire self is essential, especially for gender-diverse individuals. Gender-affirming care includes medical, social, and non-medical supports to affirm gender identity.

|

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with