Corporate Media Parrot Dubious Drug Claims That Justify War on Venezuela
With a possible military operation that could have disastrous consequences, corporate outlets are unsurprisingly ceding the floor to the warmongers.
FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation.
Ricardo Vaz is a political analyst and editor at Venezuelanalysis.


With a possible military operation that could have disastrous consequences, corporate outlets are unsurprisingly ceding the floor to the warmongers.


Rather than scrutinize María Corina Machado credentials, the media establishment whitewashed the most unpeaceful elements in her background.


New York Times columnist Bret Stephens made an overt case for US military intervention to topple Venezuela’s government.


With two months to go before Venezuelan elections, Western outlets are busy crafting familiar narratives, and leading the charge is the New York Times.


Western outlets will stop at no length to defend Washington’s agenda, even if that means reheating debunked narratives.


Corporate media remain as unwilling as ever to question US foreign policy, regardless of its deadly consequences.


US officials have free rein to continue inflicting collective punishment on Venezuelans without challenge or scrutiny.


The only allowed criticism of official policy comes from the right, demanding the US be as extreme as possible in dealing with its “enemies.”


The opposition’s electoral defeat prompted some outlets to to publish sobering headlines, and others to double down on propaganda.


As the US blockade becomes more asphyxiating to Venezuelans than ever before, corporate outlets have either turned their gaze somewhere else, or doubled down on misrepresenting sanctions.


Corporate outlets have summarily denounced Trump’s bogus claims of vote fraud, thought for years they have faithfully echoed similarly spurious accusations made about elections held by official enemies.


What better time to vilify the popular former leader of a country under deadly US siege than a deadly pandemic? Such was clearly the reasoning of Guardian journalist Rory Carroll when he penned an op-ed headlined, “Blunder, Distraction, Denial: Trump Follows Chávez’s Successful Template” (4/19/20). Seemingly immune to irony, Carroll compares Venezuela’s late socialist […]


The Trump administration unveiled on March 31 a “democratic transition” plan to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from office. Washington’s stenographers in the corporate press were quick to present the initiative as “sanctions relief.”


Backed by Washington, the coup that the Western media deny is a coup (FAIR.org, 11/11/19) appears successful, at least for the time being. However, as in the short-lived 2002 coup in Venezuela, the media blackout and savage repression have not stopped multitudes of Bolivians from taking to the streets to restore democracy. Only time will tell if the pueblo will triumph.


Bolivia has a new US-backed puppet leader, and the Western media can hardly conceal their adulation.


Allegations of Chavista drug trafficking count among the corporate media’s favorite Venezuela soundbites. A new Wall Street Journal article rehashes the same claims, but extends them to taint late President Hugo Chávez, who is purported to have “wielded cocaine trafficking as a weapon.”


There is no clearer indication of the Western media’s growing disillusionment than the gradual demotion of Juan Guaído from “interim president” to “National Assembly president” or “opposition leader.”


The New York Times’ claims of a relationship between Caracas and Hezbollah are entirely unoriginal, having been repeated by corporate journalists and national security pundits without evidence for years.


The international corporate media have long displayed a peculiar creativity with the facts in their Venezuela reporting, to the point that coverage of the nation’s crisis has become perhaps the world’s most lucrative fictional genre.


A New York Times “exposé” of Cuban doctors’ supposed interference in Venezuelan elections was riddled with inaccuracies, omissions and misrepresentations.

FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. We expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled. As a progressive group, we believe that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information.
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001
Tel: 212-633-6700
We rely on your support to keep running. Please consider donating.