Ivete Sangalo

Ivete Sangalo at the World Premiere Of Disney's Planes, El Capit

Sangalo in 2013, photo by s_bukley/bigstockphoto.com

Birth Name: Ivete Maria Dias de Sangalo

Place of Birth: Juazeiro, Bahia, Brazil

Date of Birth: May 27, 1972/1973

Ethnicity: Brazilian [Portuguese, Spanish, remote African and Indigenous]

Ivete Sangalo is a Brazilian singer, songwriter, television host, and actress. She is nicknamed “Queen of Brazil,” “Veveta,” and “President of Bahia.”

Ivete is the daughter of Maria Ivete Dias da Silva and Alsus Almeida de Sangalo. Her paternal grandfather was Spanish, and most of her ancestry is Portuguese. She is married to Daniel Cady, with whom she has three children. Her paternal grandparents are pictured here.

A DNA test whose results were displayed on the Brazilian show Fantástico in August 2006 stated that Ivete’s genetic ancestry is:

*99.2% European
*0.4% Native Brazilian (Amerindian)
*0.4% Black African

Ivete’s paternal grandfather was Jesús Sangalo Ledesma (who likely was the son of Ricardo de Sangalo/San Galo and María Antonia Ledesma). Jesús was Spanish, and likely was from Ciudad Rodrigo, province of Salamanca, Castile and Leon.

Ivete’s paternal grandmother was named Alzira de Almeida. Alzira was born in Bahia.

Ivete’s maternal grandfather was Antonio Dias da Silva (the son of João Gomes da Silva and Piauilina Dias). Antonio was born in Bahia. João was born in Bahia, the son of Félix José da Silva and Roberta Maria da Rocha Gomes.

Ivete’s maternal grandmother was Maria de Souza da Silva (the daughter of Auto/Aucto Dias da Silva and Maria Mônica de Souza). Ivete’s grandmother Maria was born in Bahia. Auto was the son of José Dias da Silva and Tereza. Ivete’s great-grandmother Maria was the daughter of Salustiano de Souza and Vitalina.

Sources: www.elcorreogallego.es (in Spanish)
http://g1.globo.com (in Portuguese)

Baptism record of Ivete’s mother – https://www.familysearch.org

Birth record of Ivete’s maternal grandmother, Maria de Souza da Silva – https://www.familysearch.org

28 Responses

  1. Jonas says:

    My best bet is around 80-85% European (mostly Spanish), and the remaining 15-20% being mostly indigenous, from her mom’s side

  2. andrew says:

    @passingtime85

    Disagree with you about the 250 years thing. About the Moors, they detected abnormal levels of North African Y-Dna in Galicia (a region that was not under Muslim control), where a part of Moors evidently relocated after being officially expelled from Iberia in 1492.

  3. passingtime85 says:

    DNA tests do not detect admixture events beyond 250 years.

    Only if a haplogroup is from a different regional origin, can they suss out if a person’s heritage has foreign roots. If the present haplogroups are overwritten, to reflect a local origin, the person will score as if they’re local, to any given area.

    Example: West European man takes a South Indian bride 300 years ago. A son is born, he has his two parents X and Y haplogroups respectively. He gets married to a West European girl, and he has a son but no daughter, and on and on, but his family never introduces any foreign haplogroups ever again, and all the individuals the descendants married, never intermarried any person of foreign origin either.

    So a modern descendant will not have any haplogroups that point to anywhere, except local West European origin. The admixture test can no longer detect the South Indian influence, because grandmother’s DNA was introduced so long ago.

    But phenotypically or physiognomy wise, there might* be some lingering differences from “pure” Western Europeans. I doubt anyone would still be able to notice any difference, but it’s possible.

    This can happen with women taking foreign husbands too, the haplogroup evidence can be erased, as long as the sex of the child, is different than the sex of the foreign parent. Otherwise if the sex of the child, matches the sex of the foreign parent, and the chain remains unbroken, the transmission of the haplogroup will remain constantly detectable, until an opposite sexed child is born.

    People in general forget that Spain and Portugal were occupied by Moors 1,300 years ago. Their presence permanently altered the population of the Iberian peninsula.

    If a Spanish person’s family lost the Moorish North African/West Asian/Sub-Saharan African haplogroups, and haven’t reintroduced them into their family gene pool, in the last 300 years, it doesn’t change the fact they probably have non-European roots. Even if it’s no longer detected through an admixture test, the foreign DNA is still there, it’s just older than current methods can detect.

    There’s a distinct difference between Iberia and the people in my example of a single admixture event. Where the single event family, probably had their foreign phenotypic traits erased, and Iberians did not lose the traits.

    In Iberia, the admixture event occured dozens, to hundreds, if not thousands of times. Children of the admixture events spread non-European genes all over Iberia. The peninsula’s population has been trading and swapping and keeping the traits alive and present for over 1,000 years, they can never be erased because of how ubiquitous they are.

    It doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme though. 4,000 years ago East/Central European men replaced the local Iberian men, and no one really cares. That probably changed the look of the people as well, but it’s another admixture event, lost to the sands of time.

    Long story short Iberia/Spain/Portugal is full of people with non-European/North African heritage and it shows on their face, even if a DNA test says their heritage 99% European. The tests simply do not count for heritage beyond 250 years, and unless the haplogroup is foreign, there’s no way to tell through genetic identification. Unless you’re some ethnic identifying maven.

    Or maybe her family’s sliver of sub-Saharan African and indigenous American heritage was very influential on their traits. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • fancyfull says:

      First point:

      Haplogroups do not change unless a mutation occurs, which creates a new branch of the original haplogroup. This applies to both paternal and maternal lines, regardless of later genetic mixing between different populations. A well-documented example involves a group of white British men from Yorkshire who shared the rare surname Revis. Although they appeared Northern European, genetic testing revealed they carried a Sub-Saharan African Y-DNA haplogroup. This indicates that their patrilineal ancestor was a Sub-Saharan African who settled in England centuries ago. His descendants retained his haplogroup because haplogroups are passed down unchanged, and even when mutations occur, the resulting subclades can still be traced back to the original lineage.

      Second point:

      North African and Middle Eastern DNA was already present in Iberia long before the arrival of the Muslims and was not introduced by them. Muslim rule did not permanently alter Iberia’s genetic makeup. Throughout the entire period, Iberia had a larger population than North Africa, and religious conflicts led to mass expulsions. When analyzing paternal and maternal haplogroups, European lineages remain overwhelmingly dominant in Iberia. On the paternal side, European haplogroups such as R1b, I2, and G account for approximately 80–85%. On the maternal side, European haplogroups including H, U, J, T, K, and V make up around 85–90%. Non-European haplogroups, such as E1b1b and J2, typically represent less than 10–15%, with regional variation. These non-European haplogroups were not brought into Iberia by the Muslim presence, but had already been part of the region’s genetic landscape for thousands of years prior. This is supported by genetic research and archaeological evidence, and these findings are widely available in reputable sources online.

  4. myfellowwhitepeople says:

    no way this woman is 99,02% white

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.