Cáncer de Próstata: Un Análisis de los Retos y

Oportunidades Actuales
• AskMayoExpert. Prostate cancer (adult). Mayo Clinic; 2018.
• Niederhuber JE, et al., eds. Prostate cancer. In: Abelo 's Clinical Oncology. 6th
ed. Elsevier; 2020. [Link] Accessed May 29, 2020.
• Partin AW, et al., eds. In: Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 12th ed. Elsevier; 2021.
[Link] Accessed May 29, 2020.
• AskMayoExpert. Prostate biopsy (adult). Mayo Clinic; 2019.
• Prostate cancer. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://
[Link]/professionals/physician_gls/[Link]. Accessed May 29,
2020.
• AskMayoExpert. Radical prostatectomy (adult). Mayo Clinic; 2019.
• Rock CL, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for diet and physical activity
for cancer prevention. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2020; doi:10.3322/
caac.21591.
• Distress management. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://
[Link]/professionals/physician_gls/[Link]. Accessed May 29,
2020.
• Thompson RH, et al. Radical prostatectomy for octogenarians: How old is too
old? Journal of Urology. 2006; doi:10.1016/[Link].2006.05.031.
• Choline C-11 injection (prescribing information). Mayo Clinic PET
Radiochemistry Facility; 2012. [Link]
daf/[Link]?event=[Link]&ApplNo=203155. Accessed June 23,
2020.
• Woodrum DA, et al. Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for
prostate cancer. Abdominal Radiology. 2016; doi:10.1007/s00261-016-0681-3.
• Agarwal DK, et al. Initial experience with da Vinci single-port robot-assisted
radical prostatectomies. European Urology. 2020; doi:10.1016/
[Link].2019.04.001.
• Gettman MT, et al. Current status of robotics in urologic laparoscopy. European
Urology. 2003; doi:10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00579-1.
• Krambeck AE, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: A
matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU
International. 2008; doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x.
• Warner KJ. Allscripts EPSi. Mayo Clinic. Feb. 4, 2020.

La Epidemia de la Desinformación en Salud Pública: Causas

y Consecuencias
• Curioso WH. Redes Sociales en Internet: Implicancias para estudiantes y
profesionales en salud. Rev Med Hered. 2011;22(3):95-7.
• Chou WS, Oh A, Klein WMP. Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on
Social Media. JAMA. 2018;320(23):2417-8.
ff
• Curioso WH, Alvarado-Vásquez E, Calderón-Anyosa R. Usando Twitter para
promover la educación continua y la investigación en salud en el Perú. Rev Per
Med Exp Salud Públ. 2011;28(1):163-64.
• Curioso WH, Carnero AM. Promoviendo la investigación en salud con Twitter.
Rev Med Hered. 2011;22(3):121-30.
• Broniatowski DA, Jamison AM, Qi S, AlKulaib L, Chen T, Benton A, Quinn SC,
Dredze M1. Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls
Amplify the Vaccine Debate. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(10):1378-84.
• Asociación Española de Vacunología. La desinformación sobre cuestiones de
salud en las redes sociales es un problema de Salud Pública; Asociación
Española de Vacunología; 2018 [acceso: 03/03/2020].
• Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science.
2018;359(6380):1146-51.
• Instituto de Estudios Peruanos. Baja con anza en las instituciones peruanas
afecta el ejercicio de su autoridad. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos; 2016
[acceso: 03/03/2020].
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Percepción ciudadana sobre
gobernabilidad, democracia y con anza en las instituciones. Perú: Instituto
Nacional de Estadística e Informática; 2019 [acceso: 03/03/2020].
• Porroche-Escudero A. Problematizando la desinformación en las campañas de
concienciación sobre el cáncer de mama. Gac Sanit. 2017;31(3):250-2.
• Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer. Guía de estilo. Salud y medios de
comunicación: Cáncer. Madrid: AECC; 2006. [ Links ]
• Curioso WH, Blas MM, Kurth AE, Klausner JD. Tecnologías de la información y
la comunicación para la prevención y el control de la infección por el VIH y otras
ITS. Rev Per Med Exp Salud Publ. 2007;24(3):262-71.
• Hartzband P, Groopman J. Untangling the Web-patients, doctors and the
Internet. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1063-6.
• National Cancer Institute. HCIRB research priority: misinformation in the age of
social media. Rockville: National Cancer Institute; 2018 [acceso: 03/03/2020].
• Curioso WH, Castillo K, Soto L, Iglesias D, Echevarría J, Gotuzzo E. Cerrando la
brecha digital en el Perú: educando a personas viviendo con VIH/SIDA para
evaluar la calidad de la información en salud en Internet. Rev Per Med Exp
Salud Publ. 2007;24(3):280-5.
• Salud con Lupa. Tu dosis de periodismo con calidad. Salud con Lupa; 2020
[acceso: 03/03/2020].
• Southwell BG, Niederdeppe J, Cappella JN, Gaysynsky A, Kelley DE, Oh A,
Peterson EB, Chou WS. Misinformation as a Misunderstood Challenge to Public
Health. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(2):282-5.
• Bode L, Vraga EK. In related news, that was wrong: the correction of
misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. J Commun.
2015;65(4):619-38.
• Gil-Quevedo W, Agurto-Távara E, Espinoza-Portilla E. Ciudadanos informados y
empoderados: claves para el pleno ejercicio de los derechos en salud. Rev Per
Med Exp Salud Públ. 2017;34(2):311-5.
fi
fi
 • Henríquez-Suárez M, Becerra-Vera CE, Laos-Fernández EL, Espinoza Portilla E.
Evaluación de programas de salud electrónica en el Perú: enfoque
multidisciplinario y perspectivas actuales. Rev Per Med Exp Salud Públ.
2017;34(4):731-7.
• Montori V. Por qué nos rebelamos. Lima, Perú: Universidad Peruana Cayetano
Heredia; 2019.

Campañas de cancer: Información a la mano del paciente.

• Curado MP, de Souza DLB. Cancer burden in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Ann Glob Health. 2014; 80(5):370-7. DOI:10.1016/[Link].2014.09.009.
• Stewart BW. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health
Organization. World cancer report 2020. Lyon: International Agency for
Research in Cancer; 2020.
• Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Cordoba R, Gironés R, Karnakis T, Paredero I, Chavarri-
Guerra Y, Navarrete-Reyes AP, Avila-Funes JA. Cancer and aging in Ibero-
America. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018; 20(9):1117-26. DOI:10.1007/
s12094-018-1844-1.
• Valadez O. Cancer as civilizing process: anthropocene, capitalocene and
complexity. In: Miramontes O, Friedrich P, Alvarez-Buylla E (Ed.). Cancer: a
complex disease. Copit-Arxives-UNAM; 2018.
• Irwin T. Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study,
and Research. Design and Culture. 2015; 7(2):229-46. DOI:
10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829.
• Irwin T, Tonkinwise C, Kosso G. Transition design: An educational framework
for advancing the study and design of sustainable transitions. Sustainability
Transitions Research Network Conference. Brighton: United Kingdom; 2015.
• Miedes UB. Diseño de la transición e inteligencia territorial. Enfoques para la
regeneración de la agencia en la era del Antropoceno. Colombia. Arquetipo.
2017; 15:7-20.
• Hirsch G, Biber-Klemm S. The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of
research. In: Hadorn GH, Ho mann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-
Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Zemp E (Eds.). Handbook of Transdisciplinary
Research (1st ed.). Springer; 2008.
• Facultad de Medicina UNAM e Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas
UNAM. Alianza contra el cáncer [Internet]. México: Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México; 2020.
• Wieck G. Systems Mapping: How Paris meets Climate Change. Medium. August
2019.
• Candy S, Dunagan J. Designing an experiential scenario: The People Who
Vanished. Futures. 2017; 86:136-153. DOI:10.1016/[Link]-res.2016.05.006.
ff
ff
 Redes sociales y desinformación sobre el cáncer:
plataformas adicionales para explorar
1. Southwell BG, Niederdeppe J, Cappella JN et al. Misinformation as a
misunderstood challenge to public health. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(2):282–285.
doi: 10.1016/[Link].2019.03.009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Howell L, editor. Global Risks 2013. Eighth Edition. Cologny, Switzerland: World
Economic Forum; 2013. Digital wild res in a hyperconnected world. Available at: http://
[Link]/global-risks-2013/risk-case-1/digital-wild res-in-a-
hyperconnected-world. Accessed August 26, 2020.
3. Pew Research Center. Social Media Fact Sheet. June 12, 2019. Available at: https://
[Link]/internet/fact-sheet/social-media. Accessed August 26, 2020.
4. Loeb S, Sengupta S, Butaney M et al. Dissemination of misinformative and biased
information about prostate cancer on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):564–567.
doi: 10.1016/[Link].2018.10.056.
5. Chapple C. TikTok Clocks 1.5 Billion Downloads on the App Store and Google Play.
SensorTower. November 14, 2019. Available at: [Link]
downloads-1-5-billion. Accessed August 26, 2020.
6. Confessore N. Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: the scandal and fallout so far.
The New York Times. April 4, 2018. Available at: [Link]
us/politics/[Link]. Accessed August 26, 2020.

Cáncer de próstata en Internet: ¿información o

desinformación?
1. Peterson JS, Swire-Thompson B, Johnson SB. What is the alternative? Responding
strategically to cancer misinformation. Future Oncol. 2020 Sep;16(25):1883–8.
doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0440
2. Teplinsky E, Ponce SB, Drake EK, Garcia AM, Loeb S, van Londen GJ, Teoh D,
Thompson M, Schapira L. Online medical misinformation in cancer: distinguishing fact
from ction. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Aug;18(8):584–9. doi: 10.1200/op.21.00764.
3. Chou W-Y, Oh A, Klein WM. Addressing health-related misinformation on social
media. JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2417–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16865.2715795
4. Warner EL, Waters AR, Cloyes KG, Ellington L, Kirchho AC. Young adult cancer
caregivers' exposure to cancer misinformation on social media. Cancer. 2021 Apr
15;127(8):1318–24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33380.
5. Lazard AJ, Collins MK, Hedrick A, Varma T, Love B, Valle CG, Brooks E, Benedict C.
Using social media for peer-to-peer cancer support: interviews with young adults with
cancer. JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 02;7(3):e28234. doi: 10.2196/[Link]://
[Link]/2021/3/e28234/ v7i3e28234
6. Chen L, Wang X, Peng T-Q. Nature and di usion of gynecologic cancer-related
misinformation on social media: analysis of tweets. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct
16;20(10):e11515. doi: 10.2196/11515.[Link]
v20i10e11515
fi
fi
ff
ff
fi
7. Loeb S, Reines K, Abu-Salha Y, French W, Butaney M, Macaluso JN, Steinberg
GD, Walter D, Byrne N, de la Garza 7 D, Smith AB. Quality of bladder cancer
information on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):56–9. doi: 10.1016/
[Link].2020.09.014.S0302-2838(20)30706-5
8. Gage-Bouchard EA, LaValley S, Warunek M, Beaupin LK, Mollica M. Is cancer
information exchanged on social media scienti cally accurate? J Cancer Educ. 2018
Dec;33(6):1328–32. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1254-z. [Link]
MED/28721645.10.1007/s13187-017-1254-z
9. Johnson SB, Parsons M, Dor T, Moran MS, Ward JH, Cohen SA, Akerley W,
Bauman J, Hubbard J, Spratt DE, Bylund CL, Swire-Thompson B, Onega T, Scherer
LD, Tward J, Fagerlin A. Cancer misinformation and harmful information on Facebook
and other social media: a brief report. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):1036–9.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab141.[Link]
10. Hunt GG, Longacre ML, Kent EE, Weber-Raley L. Cancer caregiving in the US:
an intense, episodic, and challenging care experience. National Alliance for Caregiving.
2016. Jun 17, [2023-06-12]. [Link]
318543389_Cancer_Caregiving_in_the_US_An_Intense_Episodic_and_Challenging_Car
e_Experience
11. Weaver JB, Thompson NJ, Weaver SS, Hopkins GL. Healthcare non-adherence
decisions and internet health information. Comput Human Behav. 2009
Nov;25(6):1373–80. doi: 10.1016/[Link].2009.05.011.
12. Gentile D, Markham MJ, Eaton T. Patients with cancer and social media:
harness bene ts, avoid drawbacks. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Dec;14(12):731–6.
doi: 10.1200/jop.18.00367.
13. Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB. Complementary medicine, refusal of
conventional cancer therapy, and survival among patients with curable cancers. JAMA
Oncol. 2018 Oct 01;4(10):1375–81. doi: 10.1001/[Link]://
[Link]/abstract/MED/30027204.2687972
14. Are dietary supplements safe? American Cancer Society. 2015. [2023-06-12].
[Link]
and-integrative-medicine/dietary-supplements/[Link]
15. Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB. Use of alternative medicine for cancer
and its impact on survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jan 01;110(1):121–4. doi: 10.1093/
jnci/djx145.4064136
16. Mobile fact sheet. Pew Research Center. 2021. Apr 7, [2023-06-12]. https://
[Link]/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/
17. About three-in-ten U.S. adults say they are ‘almost constantly’ online. Pew
Research Center.2021. Mar 25, [2023-06-12]. [Link]
ft_21-03-25_always_online/
18. Auxier B, Anderson M. Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. 2021.
Apr 7, [2023-06-12]. [Link]
use-in-2021/
19. Gage-Bouchard EA, LaValley S, Devonish JA. Deciphering the signal from the
noise: caregivers’ information appraisal and credibility assessment of cancer-related
information exchanged on social networking sites. Cancer Control. 2019 Apr
22;26(1):1073274819841609. doi: 10.1177/[Link]://
fi
ff
fi
[Link]/doi/abs/10.1177/1073274819841609?
url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:[Link]&rfr_dat=cr_pub0pubmed.
20. Mollica MA, Chou WS, Tonorezos ES, Smith AW. Young adult caregivers’
perceptions of cancer misinformation on social media: response to Warner et al.
Cancer. 2021 Apr 15;127(8):1177–9. doi: 10.1002/[Link]://
[Link]/doi/10.1002/cncr.33382.
21. Lazard AJ, Collins MK, Hedrick A, Horrell LN, Varma T, Love B, Valle CG,
Benedict C. Initiation and changes in use of social media for peer support among
young adult cancer patients and survivors. Psychooncology. 2021 Nov 03;30(11):1859–
65. doi: 10.1002/pon.5758.
22. Perrault EK, Hildenbrand GM, McCullock SP, Schmitz KJ, Lambert NJ. Online
information seeking behaviors of breast cancer patients before and after diagnosis:
from website discovery to improving website information. Cancer Treat Res Commun.
2020 May 01;23:100176. doi: 10.1016/[Link]://
[Link]/retrieve/pii/S2468-2942(20)30013-7.S2468-2942(20)30013-7
23. Ghenai A, Mejova Y. Fake cures: user-centric modeling of health misinformation
in social media. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2018 Nov;2(CSCW):1–20.
doi: 10.1145/3274327.
24. Sillence E. Giving and receiving peer advice in an online breast cancer support
group. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Jun;16(6):480–5. doi: 10.1089/
cyber.2013.1512.
25. Beeken RJ, Williams K, Wardle J, Croker H. “What about diet?” A qualitative
study of cancer survivors’ views on diet and cancer and their sources of information.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016 Sep 28;25(5):774–83. doi: 10.1111/[Link]://
[Link]/abstract/MED/27349812.
26. Johnson SB, Bylund CL. Identifying cancer treatment misinformation and
strategies to mitigate its e ects with improved radiation oncologist-patient
communication. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023 Feb 02;:S1879-8500(23)00033-4.
doi: 10.1016/[Link].2023.01.007.(forthcoming)S1879-8500(23)00033-4
27. Finkelstein EA, Baid D, Cheung YB, Schweitzer ME, Malhotra C, Volpp K,
Kanesvaran R, Lee LH, Dent RA, Hsien MN, Bin Harunal Rashid MF, Somasundaram N.
Hope, bias and survival expectations of advanced cancer patients: a cross-sectional
study. Psychooncology. 2021 May;30(5):780–8. doi: 10.1002/pon.5675.
28. Walsh-Buhi ER. Social media and cancer misinformation: additional platforms to
explore. Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S292–3. doi: 10.2105/
ajph.2020.305949.
29. Vraga EK, Bode L. I do not believe you: how providing a source corrects health
misperceptions across social media platforms. Inform Commun Soc. 2017 Apr
19;21(10):1337–53. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1313883.
30. Pennycook G, Rand DG. Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is
better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2019
Jul;188:39–50. doi: 10.1016/[Link].2018.06.011.S0010-0277(18)30163-X
31. Southwell BG, Machuca JO, Cherry ST, Burnside M, Barrett NJ. Health
misinformation exposure and health disparities: observations and opportunities. Annu
Rev Public Health. 2023 Apr 03;44(1):113–30. doi
ff