Hipertension Gestacional
Hipertension Gestacional
Hipertensión gestacional
AUTORES: Dra. Lissa M Melvin, Dr. Edmund F. Funai
EDITOR DE SECCIÓN: Aaron B Caughey, MD, MPH, PhD
EDITOR ADJUNTO: Dra. Vanessa A. Barss, FACOG
Todos los temas se actualizan a medida que hay nueva evidencia disponible y se completa nuestro proceso de revisión
por pares .
INTRODUCCIÓN
PREDOMINIO
FACTORES DE RIESGO
Se debe sospechar hipertensión gestacional en una paciente embarazada con todos los
siguientes [ 11 ]:
● Nueva aparición de hipertensión (presión sistólica ≥140 mmHg y/o presión diastólica ≥90
mmHg) a las ≥20 semanas de gestación.
creatinina <0,3, o una lectura de la tira reactiva de orina <2+ (si no hay otros métodos
cuantitativos disponibles).
EVALUACIÓN DIAGNÓSTICA
Confirm hypertension — Systolic pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥90
mmHg on at least two occasions at least four hours apart confirms hypertension. As
discussed above, it is neither necessary nor desirable to wait hours before confirming and
treating severe blood pressure elevation (systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic
pressure ≥110 mmHg). (See 'Clinical findings and diagnosis' above and 'Management: blood
pressures ≥160/110 mmHg' below.)
persistent right upper quadrant or epigastric pain unresponsive to medication and not
accounted for by an alternative diagnosis; and/or dyspnea due to pulmonary edema. (See
"Preeclampsia: Clinical features and diagnosis".)
Even after a normal 24-hour urine collection or protein-to-creatinine ratio, it can be difficult
to exclude preeclampsia conclusively because 10 percent of pregnant patients with other
clinical and/or histologic manifestations of preeclampsia have no proteinuria and 20 percent
of those with eclampsia do not have significant proteinuria prior to seizing [15].
Secondary causes of hypertension are listed and described in the table ( table 2) and
discussed separately (see "Evaluation of secondary hypertension"). In addition, acute
hypertension can be caused by use of drugs that can produce a hyperadrenergic state, such
as cocaine, amphetamine(s), and phencyclidine. A standardized interview to screen for
misuse of substances can be performed; some examples are provided in the table
( table 3). The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine suggests considering drug testing in
patients with acute clinical complications such as unexplained severe hypertension [16]. (See
[Link] GESTACIONAL&source=search_result&selectedTitl… 4/27
31/3/25, 16:54 A hoy
Patients who develop severe gestational hypertension have rates of pregnancy complications
comparable to those of patients with preeclampsia with severe features; thus, the two
groups are managed similarly [11].
Severe hypertension should be confirmed with a repeat measurement within five minutes
and, if confirmed, should be treated expeditiously in the hospital ( algorithm 1). Delivery is
generally indicated, regardless of gestational age, given the high risk of serious maternal
morbidity. However, expectant management in a tertiary care setting or in consultation with
a maternal-fetal medicine specialist is an option for selected patients remote from term (<34
weeks of gestation) in whom blood pressure can be controlled. Management of these
patients is reviewed separately. (See "Preeclampsia: Antepartum management and timing of
delivery", section on 'Preeclampsia with features of severe disease'.)
Site of care — Patients with gestational hypertension without severe blood pressure
elevation can be managed safely as outpatients if they are able to comply with weekly or
Patient education and counseling — Patient education and counseling are important
components of management since these patients are at increased risk of developing
preeclampsia. We instruct them to promptly report any symptoms suggestive of
preeclampsia (headache, visual changes, epigastric or right upper quadrant pain). We also
review signs suggestive of possible fetal compromise, such as decreased fetal movement
and vaginal bleeding, and signs of preterm labor.
Level of physical activity — Patients may maintain most of their normal physical activities.
Bedrest at home or in the hospital does not prevent progression to preeclampsia or improve
maternal or fetal outcome compared with usual activity, but reduces the risk of developing
severe hypertension (odds ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.83) [21,22]. The decision to advise
reduced physical activity should be individualized, taking into consideration the patient's
blood pressures, comorbidities, and psychosocial factors.
We advise against strength training and pure isometric exercise, such as weightlifting, as
these activities can acutely raise blood pressure to severe levels. Aerobic exercise can cause a
modest rise in systolic pressure, usually with no change or a slight reduction in diastolic
pressure. In the absence of information about patients' blood pressure responses to their
usual aerobic exercise activities, we advise against aerobic exercise.
Whether and how many hours patients continue to work outside the home depend on
multiple factors, particularly their blood pressure at work. These decisions should be made
on a case-by-case basis. (See "Working during pregnancy", section on 'Work characteristics'.)
● We obtain in-office blood pressure measurements once or twice weekly when the patient
comes in for a prenatal visit. Ideally, this is supplemented with home blood pressure
monitoring to determine the patient's average and peak blood pressures serially during
usual activity, and exclude the effects of white coat hypertension [12].
Fetal monitoring — The need for, type, and frequency of fetal assessment in patients with
nonsevere gestational hypertension is controversial [24]. There is no evidence from large
randomized trials that any routine surveillance method results in a decreased risk of fetal
death or neonatal morbidity in these patients. Nevertheless, antepartum fetal monitoring of
pregnancies deemed to be at increased risk of adverse fetal outcome is a routine obstetric
practice in the United States.
● NST, BPP – We monitor fetal well-being by a weekly biophysical profile (BPP) or nonstress
test (NST) plus assessment of amniotic fluid volume, increasing the frequency to twice
weekly in patients with comorbidities. We also ask them to monitor fetal movement daily
and call if it decreases. (See "Fetal assessment: Overview of antepartum tests of fetal well-
being".)
● Estimated fetal weight – We also obtain a sonographic estimation of fetal weight. If the
initial examination is normal, we repeat the ultrasound examination every three to four
weeks as hypertension of any etiology may be associated with placental insufficiency,
which can lead to impaired fetal growth [25,26]. If growth restriction with or without
oligohydramnios is present, management is the same as in any pregnancy with this
finding and reviewed separately. (See "Fetal growth restriction: Pregnancy management
and outcome".)
● Role of Doppler – We reserve use Doppler velocimetry for monitoring fetuses with growth
restriction, but some non-US guidelines include various Doppler parameters for diagnosis
of growth restriction as well ( table 4). (See "Fetal growth restriction: Pregnancy
management and outcome" and "Fetal growth restriction: Screening and diagnosis".)
Meta-analyses have found that beginning low-dose aspirin in the second trimester to
pregnant people at average or high risk of developing preeclampsia is associated with a
modest reduction in preeclampsia and its sequelae (growth restriction, preterm birth) [27].
Most participants in these trials began low-dose aspirin before 20 weeks of gestation and the
trials had a wide variety of inclusion and exclusion criteria, with some including and others
excluding individuals with gestational hypertension. A detailed discussion regarding use of
low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia prophylaxis is available separately. (See "Preeclampsia:
Prevention", section on 'Low-dose aspirin'.)
Timing of delivery — We plan for a term rather than preterm delivery, in general agreement
with guidelines from multiple major societies [28]. We individualize timing at term based on
the blood pressure level, comorbidities, and other risk factors for adverse pregnancy
outcome. Our approach tries to balance the fetal benefits of expectant management (ie,
further growth and maturation) with the maternal and fetal risks of expectant management
(eg, progression to preeclampsia or severe gestational hypertension and possible sequelae,
including stillbirth or asphyxia), which may be avoided by early delivery.
● For patients with gestational hypertension who have only a few blood pressures ≥140/90
mmHg but <160/110 mmHg and otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies (no comorbidities
or other risk factors for adverse outcome), we plan delivery for 38+0 to 39+0 weeks, or at
diagnosis if diagnosed later. We believe maternal morbidity is unlikely to increase from
only occasional episodes of nonsevere blood pressure elevation, whereas the extra one to
two weeks of expectant management is likely to reduce neonatal morbidity. Our approach
is supported by findings of a retrospective cohort study in patients with gestational
hypertension from the Consortium on Safe Labor in which induction between 38 and 39
weeks of gestation achieved the optimal balance of low maternal and low neonatal
morbidity/mortality [29].
● For patients with gestational hypertension who have frequent blood pressures ≥140/90
mmHg but <160/110 mmHg, comorbidities, or other risk factors for adverse outcome, we
plan delivery for 37+0 weeks or at diagnosis if diagnosed later. Delivery at 37 weeks rather
than later in this more complicated patient population is supported by the HYPITAT-I trial,
which randomly assigned patients at 36+0 to 41+0 weeks with gestational hypertension or
mild preeclampsia to immediate delivery or expectant management and found immediate
induction reduced the composite risk of poor maternal outcome (new-onset severe
preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, eclampsia, pulmonary edema, placental abruption: 31
versus 44 percent, relative risk 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.86), without significantly increasing
neonatal morbidity at or near term [30]. HYPITAT-II, which was performed in patients at
34+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation, also found immediate delivery reduced maternal
morbidity, but noted that the maternal benefit of preterm delivery was small in contrast to
the significant increase in neonatal morbidity with delivery before 37 weeks [31].
A consensus opinion of a workshop held by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
suggested delivery at 37+0 to 38+6 weeks for all patients with any degree of gestational
hypertension because of the risk of progression to preeclampsia [32]. An ACOG practice
bulletin, based largely on expert opinion, suggested delivery rather than expectant
management for all patients with uncomplicated gestational hypertension at ≥37+0 weeks
[11].
Route of birth — Most patients give birth vaginally. Cesarean birth is performed for
standard obstetric indications.
Postpartum care — Postpartum care is routine. Patients with excessive uterine bleeding
due to atony should not receive methylergonovine as it exacerbates hypertension. (See
"Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management", section on
'Manage atony'.)
Blood pressure should be followed closely after discharge since blood pressure peaks three
to six days postpartum when most patients are at home. Patients should be advised to seek
medical attention if they develop severe headaches or if blood pressure increases to severe
levels. ACOG suggests daily blood pressure evaluation for 72 hours postpartum and again
around 7 to 10 days postpartum, or earlier in patients with symptoms [33,34]. Another
approach is to ensure measurement at least once during postpartum days 3 to 5 [35].
Adjunctive home blood pressure monitoring is useful for daily monitoring. Blood pressure
returns to the prepregnancy baseline in most patients within two to six weeks. (See
'Resolution of gestational hypertension' below.)
MATERNAL PROGNOSIS
Recurrence risk — In a meta-analysis of individual patient data from almost 24,000 patients
with gestational hypertension who became pregnant again, 22 percent developed
hypertension in a subsequent pregnancy: gestational hypertension 15 percent, preeclampsia
7 percent [37].
Given these data, other data that individuals with a strong risk factor or several moderate
risk factors for preeclampsia benefit from low-dose aspirin therapy during pregnancy, and
the minimal risk of harm, we offer patients with a history of gestational hypertension low-
[Link] GESTACIONAL&source=search_result&selectedTi… 10/27
31/3/25, 16:54 A hoy
dose aspirin in future pregnancies. The evidence for this recommendation is available
separately. (See "Preeclampsia: Prevention", section on 'Candidates'.)
● A prospective study of over 15,000 patients with a first singleton birth observed that those
with gestational hypertension in three consecutive pregnancies had significantly higher
blood pressure later in life than patients who remained normotensive (systolic pressure 27
mmHg higher, diastolic pressure 12 mmHg higher) [40]. They also had more unfavorable
lipid and glycemic profiles, but these differences appeared to be due to higher body mass
index at follow-up in patients with a history of hypertension in pregnancy.
● In another study, patients with both gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes
were at particularly high risk for future diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 36.9, 95% CI 26.0-52.3),
hypertension (HR 5.7, 95% CI 4.9-6.7), and cardiovascular disease/mortality (HR 2.4, 95% CI
1.6-3.5) compared with patients who had neither disorder, but no information on maternal
weight was available [47].
● In a third study, gestational hypertension was associated with a twofold increased risk of
cardiovascular disease during 14 years of postpartum follow-up, and the risk increased in
those with small for gestational age (SGA) infants and/or preterm birth [45].
Clinical monitoring, risk factor evaluation, and early intervention might benefit patients with
a history of hypertension of any etiology in pregnancy. (See "Overview of primary prevention
of cardiovascular disease in adults" and "Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk
assessment for primary prevention in adults".)
PERINATAL OUTCOME
are similar to those in the general obstetric population. However, one population-based
cohort study reported that the risk of delivering a small for gestational age (SGA) newborn
at term increased by 2 percent for each mmHg rise in diastolic blood pressure from early
to late pregnancy, even in the absence of overt hypertension [53].
In a study that compared selected outcomes in patients with severe preeclampsia (n = 45),
severe gestational hypertension (n = 24), and mild gestational hypertension or
normotension (n = 467), the preterm birth rates <35 weeks were 36, 25, and 8 percent,
respectively, and SGA rates were 11, 21, and 7 percent, respectively [49]. The small number
of patients with severe gestational hypertension or severe preeclampsia limits the
generalizability of these results.
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Hypertensive
disorders of pregnancy".)
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the
Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th
grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have
about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview
and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are
longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th
grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are
comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to
print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles
on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
● Basics topic (see "Patient education: High blood pressure and pregnancy (The Basics)")
• New-onset hypertension (systolic pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥90
mmHg) at ≥20 weeks of gestation
• Normal urine protein excretion for pregnancy (<300 mg per 24-hour urine collection, or
protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.3, or urine dipstick reading <2+)
The diagnosis is confirmed postpartum if the patient does not subsequently develop
criteria for preeclampsia and the hypertension does not persist ≥12 weeks postpartum
(which suggests chronic hypertension). (See 'Clinical findings and diagnosis' above.)
● Diagnostic evaluation – The main goal is to confirm elevated blood pressure (exclude
white coat hypertension) and distinguish gestational hypertension from preeclampsia by
documenting absence of the symptoms and laboratory abnormalities listed in the table
( table 5). (See 'Diagnostic evaluation' above.)
• Systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg – Management
is the same as that for preeclampsia with severe features. Severe hypertension should
be treated urgently ( algorithm 1). (See "Preeclampsia: Antepartum management and
timing of delivery", section on 'Preeclampsia with features of severe disease'.)
- Ten to 50 percent of these patients will go on to develop preeclampsia in the next one
to five weeks, thus they require close outpatient monitoring and counseling about
signs of symptoms of the disease. (See 'Risk of progression to preeclampsia' above
and 'Patient education and counseling' above and 'Site of care' above and 'Level of
physical activity' above.)
- We measure blood pressure once or twice weekly and measure urine protein, platelet
count, and liver transaminases weekly. (See 'Maternal blood pressure and laboratory
monitoring' above.)
- We monitor fetal well-being weekly with a biophysical profile (BPP) or nonstress test
(NST) plus assessment of amniotic fluid volume, increasing the frequency to twice
weekly in patients with comorbidities. We also obtain an initial sonographic estimation
of fetal weight. If this examination is normal, we repeat the ultrasound examination
every three to four weeks. (See 'Fetal monitoring' above.)
● Timing of delivery
• Systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg – Management
is the same as that for preeclampsia with severe features. Expeditious delivery is
generally indicated, regardless of gestational age, given the high risk of serious
maternal morbidity. However, expectant management in a tertiary care setting or in
consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist is an option for selected patients
<34 weeks of gestation in whom blood pressure can be controlled. Management of
preeclampsia with severe features is reviewed separately. (See "Preeclampsia:
Antepartum management and timing of delivery", section on 'Preeclampsia with
features of severe disease'.)
GRAPHICS
Hepatic abnormality:
Impaired liver function not accounted for by another diagnosis and characterized by serum
transaminase concentration >2 times the upper limit of the normal range
and/or
Severe persistent right upper quadrant or epigastric pain unresponsive to medication and not
accounted for by an alternative diagnosis
Thrombocytopenia:
Pulmonary edema
Reference:
1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin No. 222: Gestational Hypertension and
Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135:e237.
Cushing syndrome Cushingoid facies, central obesity, proximal muscle weakness, and
ecchymoses
May have a history of glucocorticoid use
Coarctation of the aorta Hypertension in the arms with diminished or delayed femoral pulse
and low or unobtainable blood pressures in the legs
Left brachial pulse is diminished and equal to the femoral pulse if
origin of the left subclavian artery is distal to the coarct
4 Ps [1]
Parents: Did any of your parents have a problem with alcohol or other drug use?
Partner: Does your partner have a problem with alcohol or drug use?
Past: In the past, have you had difficulties in your life because of alcohol or other drugs, including
prescription medications?
Present: In the past month, have you drunk any alcohol or used other drugs?
Step 1. Use the NIDA Quick Screen to ask the patient about past-year drug use
CRAFFT – Substance Abuse Screen for Adolescents and Young Adults [3]
C Have you ever ridden in a CAR driven by someone (including yourself) who was high or had been
using alcohol or drugs?
R Do you ever use alcohol or drugs to RELAX, feel better about yourself, or fit in?
A Do you ever use alcohol or drugs while you are by yourself or ALONE?
F Do you ever FORGET things you did while using alcohol or drugs?
F Do your FAMILY or friends ever tell you that you should cut down on your drinking or drug use?
T Have you ever gotten in TROUBLE while you were using alcohol or drugs?
Scoring: Two or more positive items indicate the need for further assessment.
Confidentiality statement: NOTICE TO CLINIC STAFF AND MEDICAL RECORDS: The information on this
page is protected by special federal confidentiality rules (42 CFR Part 2), which prohibit disclosure of
this information unless authorized by specific written consent. A general authorization for release of
medical information is NOT sufficient. [3]
Reproduced from:
1. Ewing H. A practical guide to intervention in health and social services with pregnant and postpartum addicts and
alcoholics: theoretical framework, brief screening tool, key interview questions, and strategies for referral to recovery
resources. Martinez (CA): The Born Free Project, Contra Costa County Department of Health Services; 1990.
2. Screening for Drug Use in General Medical Settings: Quick Reference Guide, Version 2. National Institute on Drug Abuse.
[Link] (Accessed on October 31, 2023).
3. Center for Adolescent Behavioral Health Research, Children's Hospital Boston. The CRAFFT screening interview. Boston
(MA): CABHRe; 2009. © John R. Knight, MD, Boston Children's Hospital, 2018. All rights reserved. Reproduced with
permission. For more information, contact crafft@[Link].
Mean arterial pressure should not be reduced by more than 25% over two hours, systolic blood
pressure should not be reduced below 130 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure should not be
reduced below 80 mmHg. Blood pressures in the range of 130 to 150/80 to 100 mmHg are ideal.
During treatment, heart rate and blood pressure should be monitored closely. If delivery will not
occur for days to weeks, maintenance therapy can be initiated, if required, with oral antihypertensive
drugs. Refer to UpToDate content for additional information on treatment of hypertension in
pregnancy.
IV: intravenous; bpm: beats per minute; BP: blood pressure; mmHg: millimeters of mercury.
* Severe hypertension should be confirmed with a second BP reading within 15 minutes to facilitate
initiation of antihypertensive therapy.
¶ The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) considers use of intravenous
hydralazine, intravenous labetalol, and oral nifedipine similarly effective and safe. Dosing is slightly
different from the doses in the algorithm. ACOG guidance does not describe use of nicardipine or
reserve immediate-release nifedipine for patients without intravenous access.
ISUOG
SMFM-ACOG-AIUM
Early (<32 weeks) Late (≥32 weeks)
AC or EFW <10 th centile for GA AC or EFW <3 rd centile for GA or AC or EFW <3 rd centile for GA
UA-AEDF
or
or
Any two of the following:
AC or EFW <10 th
centile a. AC or EFW <10 th centile fo
combined with at least one of GA
the following: b. AC/EFW crossing centiles
th
a. UtA PI >95 centile >2 quartiles on growth
b. UA-PI >95 th centile centiles
c. CPR <5 th centile or UA-PI
>95 th centile
AC: abdominal circumference; ACOG: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; AEDF:
absent end-diastolic flow (estimated by Doppler ultrasonography); AIUM: American Institute of
Ultrasound in Medicine; CPR: cerebroplacental ratio; EFW: estimated fetal weight; GA: gestational age;
ISUOG: International Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; PI: pulsatility index; SMFM: Society
for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; UA: umbilical artery; US: United States; UtA: uterine artery.
Systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg on at
least 2 occasions at least 4 hours apart after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously
normotensive patient AND the new onset of 1 or more of the following*:
Proteinuria ≥0.3 g in a 24-hour urine specimen or protein/creatinine ratio ≥0.3 (30 mg/mmol) in
a random urine specimen or dipstick ≥2+ if a quantitative measurement is unavailable
Serum creatinine >1.1 mg/dL (97.2 micromol/L) or doubling of the creatinine concentration in the
absence of other kidney disease
Liver transaminases at least twice the upper limit of the normal concentrations for the local
laboratory
Pulmonary edema
New-onset and persistent headache not accounted for by alternative diagnoses and not
responding to usual doses of analgesics ¶
Definitions/diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia are generally similar worldwide except the
International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) definition also includes signs
of uteroplacental dysfunction (eg, fetal growth restriction, abnormal angiogenic markers, abnormal
umbilical artery Doppler, abruption, fetal demise). The ISSHP also considers a platelet count
<150,000/microL rather than <100,000/microL consistent with preeclampsia.
* If systolic blood pressure is ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure is ≥110 mmHg,
confirmation within minutes is sufficient.
Adapted from:
1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin No. 222: Gestational Hypertension and
Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135:e237.
2. Magee LA, Brown MA, Hall DR, et al. Clasificación, diagnóstico y recomendaciones de manejo de la Sociedad
Internacional para el Estudio de la Hipertensión en el Embarazo de 2021 para la práctica internacional. Pregnancy
Hypertens 2022; 27:148.