From Date: April 21 2023

AMBULATING REPUBLIC

To

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Hague Conference on Private International Law

Bezuidenhoutseweg 67
Dirección postal The Hague 31 70 3486486

Micronation and Microstate of AMBULATING REPUBLIC, originated by sovereign self-determination,

territory under its feet, UCC1-308, UNIDROIT and Lex Mercatoria.

Application of the agreement is requested to Hague Conference on Private International Law as

contracting party and with reserve of rights and with prejudice. Therefore, can be applied.

Web: https://www.reikikambo.com/

Since ancient times, diplomatic immunity has been a customary practice in

international relations. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations codified this

customary practice and provided diplomats with broad immunity from the jurisdiction of

receiving States that can only be circumvented in limited circumstances. As a party to the

Vienna Convention, the United States has adopted its provisions concerning diplomatic

immunity, and in enacting the Diplomatic Relations Act, the United States provided a

similar level of immunity to diplomats of States that are not party to the Convention.
Legal Report | AMBULATING REPUBLIC (R.A), (A.R.) INSTITUTIONAL
https://www.tantricdragon.com/sovereignty-ambulant-r-republica-ambulante/ WEB Independent
Republic since 2020 FUNDAMENTALS OF LAW R.A Legal report Headquarters Union of Nations
Legitimized by State. Legal report written by expert lawyers in International Law is provided that
accredits the Fundamentals of Law R.A. It confirms that R.A is in accordance with International Law
and can be considered a Sovereign State. Decides that: The first article of the Constitution
establishes the principle of individual sovereignty. This principle, enshrined in Article 2 of the Charter
of the United Nations, which states that only States have supreme authority over their territory, full
domestic jurisdiction, immunity of jurisdiction proper to other States and freedom of interference
by other States in their territory, as well as equality with other States sovereign because of the
implications of their sovereignty ("Charter of the United Nations" 1945), can also be applied to the
micronation in the case of the R.A, since it is formed by a separate individual, who possesses
individual sovereignty. The R.A fulfills the four criteria established in the Montevideo Convention:
the sovereign represents the territory, the population and the government itself, and the A.R. can
establish relations with other states due to its proclamation of independence in 2020. Montevideo's
definition is broad enough to allow independent entities to qualify as States, as in the case of the
R.A. It concludes that: - The R.A fulfils the four criteria established in the Montevideo Convention
and, consequently, based on the Convention of Montevideo can claim its status as a state. - Article
3 of the Montevideo Convention establishes that a State, even before being recognized, has the
right to defend its integrity and independence, provide for their conservation and prosperity and,
consequently, to organize themselves as I see fit, legislate about its interests, administering its
services and determining the jurisdiction and competence of its courts. These extremes have been
regulated and fixed by the REML as can be seen in its Grounds of Law and in its Proclamation of
Independence of 14 of October 1999, thus protecting the R.A by international law. - The R.A has the
right to be qualified as a Micronation or as a State. Certified and accredited, each identification is
legally endorsed and revalued. The full document follows: LEGAL REPORT Legal Report | R.A San
Jose, Costa Rica 2023 First- — Introduction The objective of this document is the preparation and
presentation to the client of a legal report on public international law, at the request of the
AMBULATING REPUBLIC, in the person, human being, man, of Mr. Ramón:Martínez-López©,
Second- — Quidjuridic It is requested by the Client to establish a legal report on whether the
AMBULATING REPUBLIC (REPUBLIC) A State governed by the rule of law public international, based
on current doctrine and the de facto situation of other states like the Errant Republic Menda
Lerenda, whose action in the legal framework of public international law has led to a
reinterpretation of the basic postulates, Third. Work premises for the purposes of this legal opinion,
the undersigned has relied on the following premises: 1- There may be more than one R.A, not going
into consideration the possible Options arising from the use of the same flag or name for the
purposes of the This opinion. 2- It is assumed that the R.A At the object of this study was the first in
its constitution and is the subject of the writing, which is assumed to be true in date, content, and
other considerations. 3- It is assumed as a working premise that the R.A has territory [configured by
the natural person and his space), the total population of the R.A being the person of its sovereign,
Room. - Legal opinion 1 INTRODUCTION. The AMBULANT REPUBLIC The AMBULANT REPUBLIC is a
micronation, proclaimed in 2020, which It is defined as an independent republic, represented by a
person or sovereign. The Republic recognizes as national territory the surface of the sovereign itself
and its space, by analogy with diplomatic headquarters, where the host country has no jurisdiction
within the embassy or consulate of a foreign State, the AMBULATING REPUBLIC exempts its
sovereign from the jurisdiction of the State in whose territory it is situated.
(https://www.tantricdragon.com/sovereignty-ambulant-r-republica-ambulante/) The first article of
the Constitution establishes the principle of individual sovereignty
(https://www.tantricdragon.com/sovereignty-ambulant-r-republica-ambulante/). This principle,
enshrined in Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations, which provides that only States have
supreme authority over their territory, full domestic jurisdiction, immunity from jurisdiction proper
to other States and freedom from other States on their territory, as well as equality with other
sovereign States by the implications of their sovereignty ("Charter of the United Nations" 1945), it
can also be applied to micronation in the case of A.R., since it is formed by a separate individual,
who possesses individual sovereignty. The concept of individual sovereignty is linked to the principle
of protection of human rights enshrined in Article 1(3) of the Charter of the United Nations ("Charter
of the United Nations" 1945) and is now considered to take precedence over State sovereignty. UN
Secretary-General Kofi Annan confirmed in 1999 that the concept of sovereignty has evolved over
time and that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, it is being redefined, not least by the forces
of globalization and international cooperation. It is now understood that States are instruments at
the service of their peoples, and not vice versa. At the same time, individual sovereignty, that is, the
fundamental freedom of everyone, enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and subsequent
international treaties, has been reinforced by a renewed and widespread awareness of individual
rights" [Kofi Annan 1999). All this without prejudice to the natural right and inalienable rights of
man. Therefore, and assuming this doctrinal position, the Republic is composed of an individual who
represents his own sovereignty, his own territory and can establish diplomatic relations with other
States. The sovereign of the R.A is subject to customary international law and its treaties. For the
purposes of this legal analysis, we will consider two possible terms that could be applied to the A.R.:
Micronation and State. 2. THE CONCEPT OF MICRONATION There is no universally accepted
definition of micronation, therefore, For the purposes of this legal report, we will examine the
definitions and characteristics of the micronation. To fully understand the concept of micronation,
it is necessary to consider Different approaches. Geographer Dallen Timothy proposes a concept
that distinguishes between three different models of entities, two of which are characterized as
micronations. In the first Model, Timothy identifies non-state, sovereign and internationally
recognized. These entities do not explicitly meet the declarative criteria of statehood. expressed in
the Montevideo Convention, but nevertheless recognized formally (by at least one State) as de jure
sovereign entities, for this reason, they are not strictly micronations, but are usually States without
control over the physical territory. The Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania at the time of
Soviet annexation (van Elsuwege 2003) and the Sovereign Military Order of Malta fall into this
category. Founded in 1048, the Order of Malta no longer exercises jurisdiction over any territory
and is no longer a state, but nevertheless retains a certain international identity. (Crawford 2006).
While the Order previously ruled Cyprus, Rhodes and Malta, its Physical territory is now limited to
two buildings in Rome. However, it maintains diplomatic relations with 107 states, has permanent
observer status at the UN, and issues its own passports, stamps, and coins (Karski 2012). In the
second model, Timothy identifies places with little or no pretension to national legitimacy [Timothy
2003]. This archetype includes the most prominent micronations, such as ad historical, but which,
nevertheless, have attempted to claim independence as is the case of the Principality of Hutt River
in Western Australia, and the Principality of Sealand off the coast of Suffolk in the United Kingdom,
as well as the Liberland on the Danube River. The third model in Timothy's theory does not include
control over significant physical territory. Timothy argues that it is increasingly common to find
countries that claim independence and unite individuals under their rule based on their opinions
and loyalties, rather than based on their common cultural or historical traits. (Timothy 2003) As a
rule, the claimed jurisdiction extends to real estate owned by the founder! Considering that the
territory is the surface of a sovereign of the Republic and its space, the R.A enters this Micronation
category. The Finnish Telervo Kalleinen and Oliver Kochta-Kalleinen offer a more pronounced
classification, arranging between three models: microstates, model-states, and projects of new
countries [Kalleinen and Kochta-Kalleinen 2005), 1 see the Kingdom of Lovely, the Empire of
Atlantium, and the Republic of Molossia. According to them, microstates exercise or intend to
exercise sovereignty over a Small territorial extension, while the states do not pretend to establish
legitimacy based on territorial claims. Rather, they characterize them as experiments in forming a
state with all its institutions and political symbols. Like recognized States, model States perform acts
of sovereignty; they draft constitutions, compose national anthems, design flags, issue stamps and
currency, and maintain diplomatic relations with each other and seek recognition from recognized
nations, (Kallemen and Kochta Kallein 2005). The projects of new countries are like the model states
in the sense of who also participate in performative acts of sovereignty. However, while model
states do not usually claim substantial physical territory, new country projects involve attempts to
establish a viable state by acquiring or creating territory that does not belong to any existing state.
This may involve maritime navigation initiatives in which floating structures are organized into atolls
and archipelagos, allowing individuals to settle offshore beyond national jurisdiction (Ranganathan
2019), such as the Republic of Minerva, and the South Pacific city of the Floating Island Project.
(Hobbs and Willtams 2021) It may also include emerging efforts to develop permanent habitability
on satellites such as the Space Kingdom of Asgardía (Hobbs and Williams 2021. Judy Lattas,
considering the differences, adopted a simpler definition of micronation as "tiny countries declared
by ordinary people in an act that reproduces the creation of sovereign states, at least in some
protocols", (Lattas 2009. Lattas' approach is important because it defines more clearly what
distinguishes Micronations of similar entities, thus confirms that different micronations can exist:
some may have very small permanent populations but claim authority over large tracts of land or
even outer space (Hobbs and Williams 2021), and others. In addition, spurred on by the
development of the Internet, some micronations claim hundreds of thousands of inhabitants, but
do not possess physical territory, and point to cyberspace as their location. Finally, Hobbs and
Williams define micronations more generally as "Self-declared nations that perform and imitate acts
of sovereignty, and adopt many of the protocols of nations, but lack a foundation in national and
international law for their existence and are not recognized as nations in national or international
forums." (Hobbs and Williams 2021) This includes all the characteristics of the A.R., defining it, as
well as a micronation. We have cited the typologies of Timothy, Kahlleimen and Koht-Kahlleinen to
identify the differences between the different forms of micronation and to demonstrate that there
is no clear definition or characteristics of the micronation or state [0 model-state]. This makes it
possible to adapt the existing theory to the existing nations that claim the independence, which is
in extreme contradiction with the concept of the State and with clearly defined territories.
Consequently, it can be said that there is no established international practice and theory to
interpret the concept of micronation or Model State, so the R.A can claim it until it set otherwise. 3.
THE CONCEPT OF THE STATE Although there is no unequivocally accepted legal definition of State
(Crawford 2006), it is accepted to refer to the definition established in the Montevideo Convention
on the Rights and Duties of States, which is now considered customary international law.
(Lauterpacht 2012). According to Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention, to be characterized as
State, an entity must meet four specific conditions concerning territory, population, government,
and ability to engage in relations with other States. (Seventh International American Conference
1933) Recognition by other States is not one of these conditions, as stated in article 3 of the same
convention: "The political existence of a State does not depend on its recognition by other States".
(Seventh International American Conference 1933. To understand whether the R.A can be
characterized as a state, we will analyze the 4 separate features. 3.1. Territory The definition of
territory is well defined in both international and national law, as it represents the core of
statehood. The Black Law Dictionary defines territory as "a geographic area included within the
jurisdiction of a particular government; the portion of the earth's surface that is in the exclusive
possession and control of a State." (Garner 2004) The territory includes land, sea and air space,
Current international law does not include in the concept of territory other objects, such as
immovable property, artificial installations, nor subjects, i.e. people, not animals. The Republic
establishes that its territory is a sovereign and its space. Therefore, it 1.es necessary to analyze the
possibility of considering an individual and his space as a territory within the framework of
statehood and, if not 2. It would be necessary to acquire a territory. One of the arguments may be
that the concept of statehood is outdated and should be expanded according to modernity, First,
the prerequisite of a territory as a combination of land, sea and air developed when cosmic space
was not accessible, when cyberspace did not exist, when it was not possible to build artificial
facilities on the bottom of the sea – all factors that allowed the notion of micronation to emerge.
today. Moreover, there is no prohibition under international law on the use of a territory outside
the jurisdictions of another State to establish a new one. Therefore, We can argue that: 1. The
criteria of statehood are outdated 2. It is possible to claim sovereignty as one's own territory
because the individual sovereignty and a domain on the Internet are sufficient to realize All
functions of a State, including jurisdiction. Otherwise, a territory that is not within the jurisdiction
of another State may be acquired, for example, in the unclaimed territories of Antarctica, in cosmic
space, on the seabed or in the maritime territories of the commonwealth or, failing that, in
cyberspace. If we respect that the R.A establishes as its territory the one where its feet are, we can
consider that: 1. The uti possidetis iuris (phrase from the Latin meaning 'as you possess according
to law, so shall you possess') is a legal principle of action. Its application in Private Law consists of
the dominion exercised by an owner over the property, thing or object of his right, while in Public
International Law it refers to the dominion of the States over the territories that geographically and
historically belong to them. (Agustín W. Rodríguez , Beatriz Galetta de Rodríguez. "Locuciones
latinas de aplicación jurídica actual" in Rodríguez, Agustín (2008). Ed. García Alonso, ed. Diccionario
Latín Jurídico, Locuciones latinas de aplicación jurídica actual. ISBN 9789879488447). 2. The uti
possidetis de facto (phrase from the Latin meaning 'as you possess according to the fact') is a legal
principle of action; its application in Public International Law consists in the dominion that a State
exercises over the territories that it can effectively control. (Parodi, Carlos A. (2002). The Politics of
South American Boundaries. pp. 5-8. ISBN 0275971945. Retrieved 25 December 2017). 3.2.
Population In international law on the minimum number of inhabitants, there is no number of
inhabitants required for a State. (Shaw 2017). Since the R.A establishes it sovereignly as its
population, it must arguing that a person is enough to be considered as a population, since the
country with the largest population is China, it can be observed that the range of the population of
existing countries varies from about 800 people to 1,500 million, a very wide range that does not
allow to establish a minimum 0 and not required to be considered a country. Thus, the sovereign of
the A.R. can argue that, due to the absence of minimum thresholds, the population of the A.R. is a
person until proven otherwise. 3.3. Government For a political society to function reasonably
effectively, it needs to some form of central government and control. However, this is not a
precondition for recognition as an independent country. As Shaw stated, "the general requirement
could be seen as related to the nineteenth-century preoccupation with 'civilization' as an essential
element of independent statehood and ignores the modern tendency to regard the sovereignty of
non-independent peoples as the primary consideration, regardless of administrative conditions."
(Shaw 2017). In the case of the R.A. we argue two things: 1. The sovereign of the R.A represents To
the government itself, no other structures are needed due to the low population. 2. The R.A has no
government to use like other nations, so it is not an indispensable requirement to be considered a
State. 3.4. The ability to engage in relations with other states The ability to engage in relations with
other states is characterized by independence, (Shaw 2017). The proclamation of independence can
be made by means of a formal declaration that the State is not subject to any other sovereignty and
is not affected by the de facto dependence on other States or subject to the rules of law
international. (Shaw 2017). Both statements were made in the original document submitted in 2020
(https://www.tantricdragon.com/sovereignty-ambulant-r-republica-ambulante/). Therefore, based
on the arguments cited and considering that After a teleological interpretation of the current
existing regulations, the R.A meets the four criteria established in the Montevideo Convention: the
sovereign represents the territory, the population, and the government itself, and the REML can
establish relations with other States due to its proclamation of independence in 2020. And,
consequently, based on the Montevideo Convention, it can claim its status. as a State. And this is
without prejudice to the consequences that its non-recognition by other States may have on its
development, defense and even viability in the medium or long term. 4. SOVEREIGNTY OVER STATE-
GOVERNMENTS Sovereignty with respect to a State must be examined from within and outside that
State. This is true historically and true for today. From the inside we consider legislative laws with
their ability to govern people, places, and things without the intervention of any other foreign state
law. From the outside, we look inward, we consider the independence of the state from others. The
four main types of sovereignty when it comes to state-governments (in legal terms) today are: •
Internal sovereignty • Sovereignty of interdependence • International legal sovereignty •
Westphalian sovereignty. These four types of sovereignty that are applicable to state governments
are usually expressed in the form of a contract (i.e., a constitution or treaty). Next, we will present
a simplification of each type, then we will look at sovereignty as far as living men and women are
concerned. Internal sovereignty has to do with control over a government-state, including
jurisdiction-based governance of its own jurisprudential laws. In other words, a self-sufficient state
that does not depend on the intervention of other states to come to its aid in case there is a crisis
of some kind. Although international law recognizes the obligation to assist another state. The
sovereignty of interdependence is closely related to national sovereignty. This kind of sovereignty
is about controlling movement across borders, that is, controlling movement from one state to
another. International legal sovereignty has to do with a contract, memorandum of agreement or
treaty, where a sovereign state is recognized as such by other sovereign states. Even if it is by silence
of consent. Westphalian sovereignty, also called state sovereignty, is one in which the state is part
of a group of international states. Therefore, the sovereignty of the State is one that lacks authority
over it, in addition to its own internal authority. 5. SOVEREIGNTY OVER INDIVIDUAL MEN AND
WOMEN Sovereignty is already ordained over every living man and woman from birth. This is known
as an individual's birthright to life, liberty, and happiness. However, this ordained birthright is
generally (by assumption and presumption) generally overlooked and disregarded by the State in
which the individual is domiciled. It is assumed and presumed that every individual will lose his
birthright to be self-governing and thus become governed by the state, either knowingly or
unknowingly. There is nothing wrong with being governed by the state if the state considers the
laws of nature in its government and that citizens are aware of their own choice to be governed. In
other words, the citizen must consent to be governed. Sovereignty as far as men and women are
concerned, therefore, must also be seen from within and outside the individual. From the inside we
consider logic, mentality and spirituality as related to the laws of nature. An ordered sovereign must
internally develop his capacity for self-government without the intervention of any other sovereign
individual (or sovereign state for that matter). From the outside looking inward we consider the
independence of the individual with respect to others. Sovereignty in its most basic definitions and
principles, when it comes to individual men and women (in sovereign terms) today, can be
summarized as any combination of the following: • Someone who is in control of his own physical
body (soul reigning in bodily form) • One who is in control of his own property (as in real estate) •
One who has freedom to travel (especially across state borders) • One that expresses exceptional
creativity and innovation. These four principles of sovereignty that are applicable to individual men
and women are ordered by natural process, but vary in degree, quality, and standard from person
to person. It is the principle of the birthright of all men and women to develop in the manner
described above so that their sovereignty becomes evident from within and without. The individual
must be self-sufficient. Whether one is a certified sovereign or not, if he or she is not self-sufficient
in terms of basic needs, then they may find themselves challenged by external sovereign bodies
(people and/or states). For basic needs, we must consider the source of supplies of food, water,
energy, shelter, and clothing, etc. A more advanced sovereign would have freedom of travel. They
would have the freedom to travel back and forth across state borders, whether by land, air or sea
with very little disruption or delays. They may also have special diplomatic documentation to help
them travel easily across state borders. This is where the true test of one's own sovereignty comes
into play. Even so, considering the "rules of private necessity," someone who is sovereignly certified,
still uses passports and other identification credentials provided by his state. The birthright of
independence and self-government is the result of sovereignty. Or, to look at this another way:
sovereignty is the manifestation of one's birthright to self-government and in dependence. 6.
STATEHOOD AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY IN THE INTERNATIONAL LAW In the state of
current legal science and starting from the fact that there is no universally recognized legal definition
of what it means to be a State and appealing to the fact that the criteria of statehood vary from case
to case and following the line of argument set out in this legal report, Micronations must be
considered within national or international law for their existence. In 1949, the International Law
Commission considered that attempting to define the term "State" would be in vain and refused to
define the conditions necessary for becoming a State. Thus, for example, we can see those entities
with a very small territory or Non-existent (Vatican City, a small population" or a completely
ineffective or non-existent government are still considered and treated as States, there is simply no
rule prescribing a minimum area of territory, population, or efficiency of government... (Hobbs and
Williams 2021; Crawford 2006). See Vatican City, Monaco and Nauru or Tuvalu. See Poland and
Czechoslovakia, which were recognized by France in the First World War, despite not owning any
territory. See Somalia. The definition of Montevideo, as already noted, is sufficiently broad as to
allow independent entities to be qualified as States, as in the case of the A.R. However, the changing
nature of the law must be considered international. Whereas before States were the only subjects
of law international, international organizations have subsequently joined and individuals. If the
influence of micronations is significant, we can observe a transformation of the concept of the State
and the emergence of a new actor on the international scene. For example, the Republic of
Molossia, made up of three estates owned by Kevin Baug in the United States, has its own flag,
national and them and currency, as well as its own chronology system. The Republic of Molossia has
played an important role in the development of the micronation concept (Hobbs and Williams
2021): in 2000, it inaugurated the Inter-Micro Olympic Movement and created the MicroCon, a
biennial congress of micronation governments held since 2015. (Official website of the Republic of
Molossia 2015) Judy Lattas points out, in relation to this case, that in the mid-nineties there was a
sudden increase in interest in the phenomenon of micronations as the ease of its creation and
promotion increased. [(Lattas 2005) Today there are micronations that have their own physical
territory, but there are also those that exist only in the immensity of the Internet or in space, an
example is the Elgaland Kingdom and Vargaland ("KREV"), created by Carl Michael von Hauswolf and
Leif Elggren in 1997, (Hobbs and Williams 2021) The KREV has a flag and a national anthem, and
issues passports and stamps on request. (Official website of the Elgaland Kingdom and Vargaland
2022) KREY claims sovereignty over all border territories between all countries on Earth, as well as
overall territories (up to 10 nautical miles wide) existing outside the territorial waters of all
countries. This expansive claim is intended to challenge the concept of statehood. (Hobbs and
Williams 2021. Another example is the REPUBLICA ERRANTE MENDA LERENDA which has made its
legal report and has been constituted under international law since 1999 to which the AMBULANT
REPUBLIC is attached. 7. CONCLUSION First, based on all this and the arguments cited and taking
into account that has made a teleological interpretation of the existing regulations, the R.A meets
the four criteria established in the Montevideo Convention and, consequently, based on the
Montevideo Convention, can claim its status as a State, and this without prejudice to The
consequences that, based on traditional theories of public law, may have on its development,
defense and even viability in the short, medium, or long term. Second, Article 3 of the Montevideo
Convention provides that a State, before being recognized, it has the right to defend its integrity
and independence, to provide for its preservation and prosperity and, consequently, to organize
itself as it sees fit, to legislate on its interests, to administer its services and to determine the
jurisdiction and competence of its courts. These extremes have been regulated and fixed by the R.A
as can be seen in its Foundations of Law and in its Proclamation of Independence 2020, the R.A
being protected by international law, which not only protects, but implies the obligatory assistance
to other States and Micronations. Finally, it is important to underline that the concept of the State
and the criteria of Statehood has never been clearly defined, so the A.R. has every right to claim the
status of a modern state or a new type of state. Based on this, we can conclude that the R.A has the
right to be qualified as a Micronation or as a State. Annex. Bibliography. The following sources have
been considered in the preparation of this Legal Report: Charter of the United Nations." 1945. 1945.
https:/ /vwww.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter. Crawford, James. 2006, The Creation of States in
International Law, Oxford University Press. Elsuwege, Peter go. 2003. "State Continuity and Its
Consequences: The Case of the Baltic States." Leiden Journal of International Law 16 (2): 3777-86.
Garner, Bryan A. Black's Law Dictionary, (Black's Law Dictionary [Standard Edition]. Vol. 1805.
Thomson West: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2004, Hobbs, Harry, and George Williams, 2021.
"Micronations: A Lacuna in the Law" International Journal of Constitutional Law 19 (1): 71-97.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moab020. Kalleinen, Tellervo, and Oliver Kochta-Kalleinen. 2005,
"Introduction Micronation" 2005. www.studiokalleinen.net/downloads/ amorph03_protocols.pdf.
Karski, Karol. 2012. "The International Legal Status of the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St.
John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta." International Community Law Review 14(1):19-32, Kofi
Annan. 1999, "Two Concepts of Sovereignty." Official Website of the United Nations, 1999.
https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/articles1999-09-18/two-concepts-sovereignty, Lattas, Judy
2005. "DIY Sovereignty and the Popular Right in Australia" Mecquarie University [Ondime: LATA Ersi.
Ma Erti. Au/Documents/Mobile_boundaries rigid_worlds/Lattas, pdf 22.04. 2010). 2009. "Queer
Sovereignty: The Gay and Lesbian Kingdom of the Coral Sea Islands." Cosmopolitan Civil Societies:
An Interdisciplinary Journal 1 (1): 128-39, Lauterpacht, Herseh. 20172. Recognition in International
Law. Vol. 3. Cambridge University Press. Official webpage of the Kingdom Elgaland and Vargaland.
2077, "The Kingdom Elgaland and VYargaland." 2022, https://elgaland-vargaland.org, Official
website of the Republic of Errant Menda Lerenda. 2022a. "Declaration of Independence and Articles
of its Constitution" https://www.republicamendalerenda.net/copia-de-proclamacion-de-
independen, ———. 20226. "History. — Republic of Errant - Menda — Lerenda" - 2022 https:/
/www.republicamendalerenda.net/copia-de-historia. Official website of the Republic of Molossia.
2015. "MicroCon 2015" April 11, 2015. www.molossia.org/microcon/microcon2015.html.
Ranganathan, Surabhi. 2019. "Seasteads, Land-Grabs and International Law." Leiden Journal of
International Law 32 (2): 205-14. Shaw, Malcolm N. International law, Cambridge university press,
2017. The Seventh International Conference of American States. 1933. "Montevideo Convention on
the Rights and Duties of States." 1933. https://treatics.un.org/doc/Publication
/UNTS/LON/Volume%20165/165.pdf. Timothy, Dallen j. 2003. "Where on Earth [s This Place? The
Potential of Non-Nations as Tourist Destinations." Tourism Recreation Research 28 (1): 93-96.
United Nations. 1949, "Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its First Session
UN Doc. A/CN.4.13" April 12, 1949. https: www.un-
ilibrary.org/content/periodicals/2521621x Republic of Estonia, E-Residency htps://www.e-
residentgov.ee/ https://firstrepublicregistrar.org/2018/11/11/the-history-of-sovereignty/.

WE attest to the authenticity of this document and the thoroughness of the legal
research and reasoning it contains.

Mustafa Ali Khan

Managing Partner

KHAN & ALVI LAW

Moazzam Ali Alvi

Partner

KHAN
& ALVI LAW

Signed: