Committee Guidelines of the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol)

Index

1. Welcome letters ........................................................................................................... p.p. 3-4

1.1 Secretarial welcome letter …................................................................................................... pag. 3

1.2 Presidential welcome letter …................................................................................................. pag. 4

2. Introduction to the committee …............................................................................... p.p. 5-6

2.1 Goal of the committee …...................................................................................................... p.p. 5-6

3. Topic A: The illegal trafficking of cultural heritage pieces and artifacts on the Deep Web
…........................................................................................................................... p.p. 6-9

3.1 Summary of the topic …....................................................................................................... p.p. 6-7

3.2 Historical context ….............................................................................................................. p.p. 7-8

3.3 Causes …................................................................................................................................. pag. 8

3.4 Repercussions …...................................................................................................................... pag. 8

3.5 Current framework ….............................................................................................................. pag. 9

3.6 Important approaches …..................................................................................................... p.p. 9-10

4. Resources and support for delegates …................................................................. p.p. 10-12

4.1 Inquiry Questions ….............................................................................................................. pag. 10

4.2 QUARMAS …....................................................................................................................... pag. 10

4.3 Delegations’ position ….................................................................................................... p.p. 10-12

4.4 Recommended sites …........................................................................................................... pag. 12

5. Topic B: Repercussions and effects of artificial intelligence on society …........... p.p. 12-#

1
5.1 Summary of the topic …................................................................................................... p.p. 12-13

5.2 Historical context ….......................................................................................................... p.p. 13-14

5.3 Causes …........................................................................................................................... p.p. 14-15

5.4 Repercussions …............................................................................................................... p.p. 15-16

5.5 Current framework …..................................................................................................... p.p. 16 - 18

6. Resources and support for delegates …................................................................. p.p. 18-20

6.1 Inquiry questions …............................................................................................................... pag. 18

6.2 QUARMAS …....................................................................................................................... pag. 18

6.3 Delegations’ positions ….................................................................................................. p.p. 18-20

6.4 Recommended sites …........................................................................................................... pag. 20

7. Presidents’ information
8. Bibliography …........................................................................................................ p.p. 21-22

2
1. Welcome letters

1.1 Secretarial welcome letter

Estimados delegados,

Es para nosotras un honor y un privilegio darles la bienvenida a lo que por mucho tiempo hemos tenido
como meta y hoy por fin podemos decir que es una realidad, CSVMUN III. Para este proyecto hemos
puesto nuestro mayor esfuerzo y dedicación para que ustedes puedan tener una maravillosa experiencia
llena de aprendizaje, en el que cultiven y enriquezca su amor a lo que es conocido como el mundo de
los Modelos de Naciones Unidas, el cual aún más que una actividad meramente académica, es una
ventana al mundo. Como junta directiva, más que convertirse en los mejores delegados, queremos que
cada día den lo mejor de sí́ para demostrar la mejor versión de lo que es cada uno, ciudadanos que no
solo solicitan un cambio en este mundo con problemas tan grandes, más que eso ayuden a elaborar
soluciones para crear el mundo a donde ustedes quisieran pertenecer. Adicionalmente, que estas
experiencias les otorgue una visión más amplia de las injusticias a las cuales muchos ciudadanos son
sometidos, por falta de lideres, valores éticos y morales, educación, entre muchos otros factores que
permitan el desarrollo de una comunidad.

Delegados, ustedes tendrán la oportunidad de vivir temas increíbles como si fueran parte de las
Naciones Unidas, tocando desde temas de origen ambiental, hasta temas policiacos, de patrimonio
cultural, de desigualdad, de fútbol y temas muy actuales, como lo son la guerra de Palestina e Israel
para así̀ convertirse en dueños del mundo, apropiándose de los temas con mucha diplomacia.

Esperamos que ustedes como participantes del CSVMUN III se den la oportunidad de aprender
mutuamente y se lleven una buena experiencia no solo para su trayectoria académica, sino para la vida.
Que el CSVMUN III pueda dejar en ustedes una huella, una experiencia y un recuerdo que
fervorosamente esperamos no olviden.

Cordialmente,
Junta Directiva CSVMUN III

3
1.2 Presidential welcome letter

Honorable delegates,

We, Valeria Gracia and Maria Alejandra Hajduk, would like to extend special greetings and welcome
you both to the CSVMUN III and to the International Crime Police Organization (INTERPOL)
committee and are extremely glad to have you as a vital part of this committee.

Rest assured that your expectations will not be disappointed as we will deal with the future of the globe.
We oversee the risks that are coming with the recent technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI)
and the Deep Web; and must discuss what regulations will there be to avoid financial crimes, human
rights violations and cultural loss, which are the most present threads that are coming with these
innovations.

In this committee we are not just delegates, we represent our nations and most importantly all our
citizens of the globe. We are in charge of protecting the future of the world and maintaining security
for everyone. During these few days of the model, we will use the most powerful weapon there is to
humankind, speech. It can be used either to inspire solidarity or to provoke anger; and we need you to
learn to use it wisely as you will be the ones in charge of creating a safer world in the future.

Finally, we would like to remind you that we are here to help you throughout this whole process and
wish for you to enjoy and appreciate this learning experience as much as possible as it is an extremely
enriching experience which introduces us to a whole new world of possibilities and perspectives.

“Independence is not only the end of an oppressive regime; it is the beginning of the
responsibility of building a just society” - Nkrumah, K.

4
2. Introduction to the Committee

The International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) is an inter-governmental

organization that has 195 member countries and helps the police in all these countries to work together
to make the world a safer place. To do this, the organization enables the police systems to access global
databases with information on crimes and criminals, operational and forensic support, analytical
services, and training (INTERPOL, n.d.).

The INTERPOL is conformed by the General Secretariat, a body staffed by both police and
civilians which coordinates its daily activities and is run by the Secretary General (Jurgen Stock); it
comprises a global complex for innovation and several satellite offices in different regions of the globe.
In each country, an INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NBC) provides the crucial point of contact
for the General Secretariat and other NBCs. An NBC is run by national police officials and usually sits
in the government ministry responsible for policing.

The organization was set up in 1923 by 20 countries who saw an urgent need to facilitate
cooperation between police across borders. Since then, the world has changed but the need for such
cooperation remains as strong as ever; today, INTERPOL plays a vital role in the global security
architecture, representing stability, offering neutrality, and inspiring trust in a fast-changing world.
(“INTERPOL 100”)

For example, INTERPOL has color-coded Notices that enable countries to share alerts and
requests for information worldwide. These Notices are issues by the General Secretariat, International
Criminal Tribunals, the International Criminal Court, or the Security Council. Most of these notices are
for police use only and are not available to the public; however, an extract of them can be published on
the Organization’s site if the requesting country wants to alert the public or ask for their help.

2.1 Goal of the Committee

As it is the only police organization that works at the global level, INTERPOL plays a unique
role in supporting international policing efforts. The organization is ruled by one general goal, which is
to enable police in its 195 member countries to work together to make the world a safer place
(INTERPOL. 2022) and has developed a set of seven Global Policing Goals, aligned with the United
Nations 2030 Agenda of Sustainable development, which address a range of issues related to crime and
security to shape how the global law enforcement community works. These goals are aligned with the
United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. They are universal and ambitious, but our
committee will focus on the following ones:

1. Counter the thread of terrorism.

- Identify and arrest terrorist suspects.

5
 - Strengthen intelligence-sharing platforms.
- Disrupt terrorist movement and mobility.
- Trace and disrupt financial streams and weapons sourcing.
2. Protect vulnerable communities.
- Detect crimes and criminals and identify prevention opportunities.
- Protect victims of crime from exploitation and re-victimization.
- Respect human rights of vulnerable communities.
- Develop vigorous networks of experts to exchange information, best practice, and operational
activity.
- Disrupt the profit element in the criminal business model.
- Identify and disrupt the illicit financial stream and profits derived through this criminal business
model.
3. Secure cyberspace for people and businesses.
- Establish partnerships to secure cyberspace.
- Expand cybercrime investigative expertise.
- Safeguard communities through standard setting, public education.
- Protect critical infrastructure.

3. Topic A: The illegal trafficking of cultural heritage pieces and artifacts on the Deep Web.

3.1 Summary of the topic

Cultural heritage pieces have a major ethnic, artistic, historical, and scientific importance all
around the globe. However, they are the object of looting, theft, and trafficking, mostly in areas affected
by armed conflicts and natural disasters, and primarily caused by the pursuit of profit at all costs.

This practice, which contributes significantly to the maintenance of terrorism, organized crime,
and money laundering, is a worldwide problem that has exponentiated through the last decades
alongside the rise of the internet and online globalization. The evolution of this technology has lowered
the barriers between the buyers and sellers of illicitly acquired artifacts and has made smuggled
antiquities accessible to a much bigger group as well; all this is carried out through the formation and
design of websites and pages designed for these kinds of transactions which are in an interface that
avoids this kind of networks to be accessed by the general public, called the “Deep web”.

The international community has acknowledged the cultural and economic cost that this illicit
trading has brought all around the globe. And because of that, the International Criminal Police
Organization (INTERPOL) works alongside several organizations such as the European Commission,
the International Council of Museums (ICOM), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural

6
Organization (UNESCO), and the World Customs Organization (WCO) to develop initiatives who
successfully combat the trafficking of antiquities. (Georgiadis and Patias, 2023)

3.2 Historical context

Cultural theft and looting have been present for as long as art and cultural heritage have had
any value and significance, dating even to the Mesopotamian civilization. In this theft, imperialism and
colonialism have played a significant role, as the colonizing societies take the cultural artifacts of the
colonized as a trophy and use them as well as other parts of the local culture to establish their
nationalism and power more easily; this was also done to praise the looting civilization as a higher
society, as they had the competence to submit another civilization under their power and take their
culture as their rightful property.

This situation exponentiated after the Second World War, with Nazi Germany appropriating art
from public and private holdings all through Europe and Russia starting with illegal seizures that took
part as the prosecution of the Jewish population and the desire to emulate an encyclopedic exhibition
of art history as the one established by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1793.

But with the development of the internet at the end of the 20th century, the world found a new
way to conduct and connect businesses and transactions such as inverse auctions from all around the
globe, including illicit ones. Between the years 2000 and 2003, electronic auctions rose on a 75%
approbation rate from the public, including the usage of bidding platforms to trade illegally acquired
pieces of art and culturally important artifacts; the problem for the actors of these illicit transactions is
that the web leaves traces of every action that is done online, so they found a way to conduct their illegal
business anonymously to not get caught.

This is when the deep web was created in 2001, but it was until 2009 that trading, and business
took place in these platforms and that came with the creation of cryptocurrencies; this is because
cryptocurrencies are untraceable, making it almost impossible for authorities to find the IP addresses of
the buyers and sellers.

After this, illegal trafficking of artifacts and culturally important pieces through the Deep Web
has become an epidemic, which exponentiated with the actual pandemic of Covid-19; the Antiquities
Trafficking and Heritage Anthropology Research (ATHAR) Project, a team of anthropologists and
heritage experts specializing in digital networks for art trafficking, observed a resurgence in the sale of
stolen objects on social networks – particularly from the Middle East and North Africa – during the
lockdown period.

However, this problem has not been neglected by the international community; in 1970 the
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) signed the treaty of the
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of
7
Ownership of Cultural Property; the INTERPOL developed a database of stolen works of art and as
such, whose data collection is facilitated by the Protection System for Cultural Heritage Project
(PSYCHE); and the World Customs Organization (WCO), alongside the Regional Intelligence Liaison
Office in Western Europe (RILO WE) host an internet-based network dedicated to prevent traffic in
cultural property, the Automated and Remote Customs Heritage Enforcement Operations (ARCHEO).

3.3 Causes

Illegal trafficking of artifacts and cultural heritage pieces in the Deep Web does not have a wide
set of motives. In terms of the buyers, it is primarily motivated by the production of economic profit at
all costs, whether it is for personal reasons or to finance illegal or terrorist groups as it is the case of the
ISIS group; And in terms of the buyers, it is motivated by the desire to possess these pieces regardless
of their origin or the illicit nature of this practice adds a certain desire for them to acquire these artifacts.

3.4 Repercussions

The illegal traffic of cultural heritage pieces and artifacts on the Deep Web has a wide series of
repercussions worldwide both for society and for the maintenance of cultural heritage. They include:
- Loss of cultural heritage: The trafficking of cultural artifacts usually results in the permanent
loss of them and in consequence, the loss of the memory of the traditions of the endemic culture
of the civilizations of origin.
- Social conflict: This practice may produce conflicts as the countries of societies that the
trafficked artifacts come from may fight for a repatriotization of these artifacts.
- Funding of illicit activities: Trafficking of artifacts is an extremely lucrative activity and
terrorist groups may use it to finance their causes. For example, the UN has reported that ISIS
and other individuals have generated income from the looting and smuggling of cultural
property from archaeological sites and museums in Iraq and Syria.

3.5 Current framework

After the COVID-19 pandemic, the trade of illicit artifacts and culturally significant pieces in
the Deep Web exponentiated significantly, becoming a plague that affects society worldwide. However,
the international community has not overlooked this problematic and the affections it has; that is why
the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) organized alongside the World Customs
Organization (WCO) the first joint customs and police operation codenamed Athena, with which they
seized more than 41.000 objects of cultural significance on the year 2020.

And, as it was mentioned before, the INTERPOL developed a database of stolen works of art
and as such, whose data collection is facilitated by the Protection System for Cultural Heritage Project

8
(PSYCHE); and the World Customs Organization (WCO), alongside the Regional Intelligence Liaison
Office in Western Europe (RILO WE) host an internet-based network dedicated to prevent traffic in
cultural property, the Automated and Remote Customs Heritage Enforcement Operations (ARCHEO).

All this has been done to protect the culture of hundreds of civilizations worldwide and with
that, to protect human history, which is the goal of this battle.

3.6 Important approaches

The important approaches to consider regarding the topic of discussion would be:

- Breaches in regulation: The current legal frameworks of certain countries and on the global
legislation and certain issues of the enforcement of the present laws cause certain breaches that
make the process difficult to combat the present problem.
- Cultural and economic implications: The cultural importance of stolen items for human
history and the perseverance of global culture and the effect that trafficking has on this.
- Protection and recovery: The initiatives of recovery and repatriotization of looted items that
have been successfully established and enforced and the ones that must be established as well.
There must also be taken into consideration the initiatives and projects that are present to protect
cultural heritage items, pieces and locations, and those that could be established.
- Cybersecurity and Law Enforcement Collaboration: There must be taken into consideration
the cybersecurity challenge that is present with this problem and that must be addressed on an
immediate basis.
- Preservation of Digital Cultural Heritage: It is important to discuss the importance of
preserving Cultural heritage in the digital realm and the risk that it is at with digitalization and
online globalization.
- Measures of success: there must be a metric and indicator that ensures the measure of the
success of the efforts to combat illegal trafficking of cultural heritage on the Deep Web.

4. Resources and support for the delegates

4.1 Inquiry questions

− What is your country’s assessment of the situation?

− How has your country been affected by the illegal traffic of cultural heritage pieces and
artifacts? What measures has your country taken on the matter?
− How much support has your country shown to the measures taken by INTERPOL?

9
 − What legislation does your country have to combat the illegal traffic of cultural heritage pieces
and artifacts on the Deep Web? Which challenges and obstacles does your country have to
enforce them?
− What is your country’s stance on strengthening cybersecurity measures to counter the illegal
trafficking of cultural artifacts on the Deep web?

4.2 QUARMAS

− How extensive is the problematic of illegal trafficking of cultural heritage artifacts on the Deep
Web in a global context?
− What is the cultural significance of the items stolen and what does their loss represent to the
communities and nations?
− What types of artifacts are mostly targeted by traffickers?
− How does the Deep Web function?
− What are the key technological challenges involved in tracking and prosecuting individuals
involved in this illegal trade?
− What international legal frameworks exist to address the protection of cultural heritage? How
are they applied to the Deep Web?
− What challenges are present in the enforcement of laws and regulations related to the protection
of cultural heritage on the Deep Web?

4.3 Delegations’ positions

− French Republic: The Republic has helped INTERPOL and other different international
organizations in operations which have led to 52 arrests and the seizure of 9,408 cultural
artefacts across the world. The protection of cultural heritage is such an important matter for
the French Republic, that on 2022, when the country had the presidency of the European Union
(EU), the country prioritized the reinforcement of European cooperation against illicit
trafficking in cultural property on the agenda. Although the country has been a victim of illegal
art exportation, in recent years, it has become much more of an importing country.
− Islamic Republic of Iran: Because of its location and historical background, Iran is a victim of
the looting of their cultural properties; the country is working alongside INTERPOL, UNESCO
and UNODC to help it prevent further traffic of their cultural property and recover the already
looted pieces.
− Kingdom of Spain: The kingdom is extremely involved on the matter of interfering with the
illegal traffic of cultural goods, helping and coordination several seizures across several

10
 countries all over Europe. The country has even recently helped the Hindu government on
strategies to combat cultural trafficking.
− People’s Republic of China: The country, being one of the most innovative ones, has launched
webpages focused on the fight against illegal trafficking of cultural relics and is dedicated on
the prevention of this illegal transactions. And has had several successful operations focused
on the repatriotization of significant pieces of art.
− Republic of Iraq: Caused by the recurrent conflicts present in the country, the Republic is
suffering from several cultural damages, some of them irreversible with the destruction and loss
of several artifacts and cultural infrastructure pieces. It is on a cultural state of crisis and is
receiving several helps from the UNESCO and the United States.
− Russian Federation: The Federation has suffered several cultural losses because of the recent
conflict with Ukraine, multiple terrorist groups have looted form the war. Taking several
museum pieces and trafficking them online. But the country is working to recover and
repatriotize the reported stolen artifacts from their nation.
− Syrian Arab Republic: The Republic was one of the signing members of the 1970 UNESCO
convention. But because of the reiterated armed conflicts that the country has been going
through, the illegal trafficking and looting of archeological sites and culturally important pieces
has exponentiated drastically. The Syrian law system penalizes these practices and works along
the UNESCO to enforce these regulations, nonetheless, according to reports, the Syrian
government only controls 30% of its territory and the UNESCO is only able to work with State
entities, which causes big difficulties to protect the historical pieces and cultural artifacts all
through the country.
− United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: The kingdom is one of the members of
the European commission which is extremely involved in the process of fighting the traffic of
cultural and historical pieces; it is also one of the countries who have been victims of the traffic
of their art ´pieces sand cultural heritage artifacts.
− United States of America: Since 2011, the Unites States government has been working with the
Smithsonian Institution to establish several types of activities to protect the cultural property of
countries in conflict such as the Iraqi and Syrian cultural property. The country is also extremely
involved in helping the repatriotization of smuggling recovered artifacts and to help countries
recover their cultural heritage.

4.4 Recommended sites

− https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/10/2579
− https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2020/101-arrested-and-19-000-stolen-
artefacts-recovered-in-international-crackdown-on-art-trafficking

11
 − https://en.unesco.org/courier/2020-4/we-must-punish-looters-also-buyers
− https://mag.wcoomd.org/magazine/wco-news-79/customs-cultural-goods-and-data/

5. Topic B: Repercussions and effects of artificial intelligence on society.

5.1 Summary of the topic

The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on society is deep and diverse, surrounding many aspects of
human life and activity. Defined as the simulation of human intelligence processes through computer
systems, AI has the potential to revolutionize industries, transform economies, and reshape social
structures. However, that promise also comes with challenges and ethical considerations that must be
addressed. The main impact of AI on society is its impact on the labor market. Automation through AI
has the potential to increase productivity and efficiency in many sectors, but it also raises concerns
about job losses and the future of human labor. Certain tasks and roles traditionally performed by
humans are being automated, creating job losses and the need for retraining and upskilling to adapt to
new job demands. This can exacerbate income and socio-economic disparities if not managed
effectively. Additionally, AI technologies have implications for data protection and data security. The
proliferation of AI-powered systems such as facial recognition, predictive analytics, and
recommendation algorithms has raised concerns about the potential for surveillance, data breaches, and
misuse of personal data. As AI algorithms become more sophisticated and ubiquitous, they will require
stronger regulation and protections to protect individual privacy and reduce the risk of algorithmic bias
and discrimination. In addition to economic and data protection issues, AI also has ethical implications
that require careful consideration. Issues such as algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and the
ethical use of AI in decision-making processes are becoming increasingly relevant in areas such as
healthcare, criminal justice, and governance. Pre-settled AI algorithms can perpetuate systemic
inequalities and injustices, highlighting the importance of ethical AI design, development, and
deployment practices. Despite these challenges, AI also offers important opportunities to address some
of society's most pressing problems. For example, AI-powered technologies have the potential to
revolutionize healthcare by improving diagnosis, treatment, and patient care. In education, personalized
AI-based learning systems can improve student outcomes and educational equity. Moreover, AI has the
potential to drive innovation, stimulate economic growth, and create new opportunities for societal
development and prosperity. In summary, the impacts and implications of AI on society are far-reaching
and complex, with both positive and negative impacts. AI has the potential to bring about transformative
change and progress, but it also brings challenges around employment, privacy, ethics, and equity. To
realize the benefits of AI while mitigating its risks, policymakers, industry stakeholders, researchers,
and civil society can work together to create a responsible AI framework that prioritizes human well-
being, equity, and sustainability. It is essential to develop.

5.2 Historical context

12
The historical context of the impact and influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on society can be traced
back to the mid-20th century, when the concept of AI first emerged as a field of study and research.
The term "artificial intelligence" was coined at his 1956 Dartmouth Conference, where scientists and
researchers gathered to explore the possibility of developing machines that could simulate human
intelligence. In the decades that followed, AI research experienced periods of both excitement and
skepticism, often driven by breakthroughs in technology and advances in theory. In the 1960s and
1970s, AI pioneers developed early AI systems such as expert systems and rule-based reasoning
programs, which showed potential for solving specific problems, but humans Such intelligence could
not be achieved. The 1980s and 1990s saw significant advances in AI research, particularly in areas
such as machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing. Breakthroughs such as the
development of backpropagation algorithms for training neural networks and the rise of symbolic AI
systems have increased optimism about AI's potential to revolutionize various industries and fields. Ta.
However, the historical background of AI is one of disillusionment and setbacks, the so-called "AI
winter," characterized by funding cuts, stagnant research progress, and public skepticism about the
feasibility of true artificial intelligence. It also includes the period of These AI winters occurred in the
1970s, 1980s, and early 2000s due to excessive expectations and failed promises. In recent years, the
historical context of AI has been shaped by rapid advances in computing power, data availability, and
algorithmic innovation, leading to a resurgence of interest and investment in AI technologies.
Breakthroughs in deep learning, reinforcement learning, and big data analytics are driving AI
applications in areas such as image recognition, natural language processing, self-driving cars, and
healthcare. Today, as AI-powered technologies permeate many aspects of human life and our activities,
the influence and impact of AI on society is becoming increasingly clear. From virtual assistants and
recommendation algorithms to self-driving cars and predictive analytics, AI is transforming industries
and economies, raising deep ethical, social, and economic questions about the future of work, privacy,
fairness, and accountability. It's causing it. As we trace the historical background of AI and its impact
on society, we reflect on the lessons of the past, anticipate future challenges, and consider responsible
AI development and deployment to promote human well-being, justice, and social standing. It is
important to try to put it into practice. Sustainability is at the forefront of today's artificial intelligence.

5.3 Causes

The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on society is manifold and lies in a variety of technical,
economic, social, and ethical factors. The main causes are: 1. Technological advances: Rapid advances
in computing power, algorithmic innovation, and data availability have accelerated the development
and deployment of AI technologies. Breakthroughs in machine learning, deep learning, and natural
language processing are enabling AI systems to perform tasks once thought to be exclusive to human
intelligence. 2． Economic incentives: There are significant economic incentives to drive AI adoption
across industries. Businesses are investing in AI technology to increase efficiency, reduce costs,
increase productivity, and gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. The potential for process

13
automation and optimization has led to widespread adoption of AI-driven solutions in sectors such as
manufacturing, finance, healthcare, and retail. 3. Demand for automation: The demand for automation
and intelligent systems to perform repetitive tasks, analyze large data sets, and make data-driven
decisions has driven the growth of AI. Businesses want to streamline their operations, increase
scalability, and achieve operational excellence by integrating AI-powered tools and systems into their
workflows. 4. Social and cultural factors: Society's expectations and cultural attitudes toward
technology play a key role in shaping the adoption and acceptance of AI. Public perceptions of AI are
influenced by media portrayals, popular culture, and narratives about the potential benefits and risks of
AI. Attitudes toward AI vary by demographic, regional, and cultural background, influencing societal
impact and adoption rates. 5. Policy and Regulation: Political decisions, regulations, and legal
frameworks surrounding the development, deployment, and use of AI will have a significant impact on
its societal impact. Governments and regulators are grappling with issues such as privacy, algorithmic
bias, accountability, and transparency in AI systems. The lack of robust governance mechanisms can
lead to ethical dilemmas, unintended consequences, and social inequalities arising from the use of AI.
6． Ethical considerations: Ethical considerations related to AI, such as fairness, accountability,
transparency, and bias, are central to the social impact of AI. Concerns about algorithmic bias,
discrimination, and the potential for AI to exacerbate existing inequalities call for ethical AI
development and responsible deployment practices. Ethical frameworks, guidelines, and principles aim
to promote AI systems that prioritize human values, rights, and dignity. 7. Globalization and
Competition: In a globalized economy, countries and companies compete to lead AI innovation and
gain strategic advantage in areas such as national security, economic growth, and technological
leadership. The race for AI dominance is driving investment in research and development, talent
acquisition, and infrastructure, and shaping the evolution of AI's social impact on a global scale.
Understanding these causes is critical to addressing the challenges and leveraging the potential benefits
of AI while mitigating negative impacts on society. By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration,
promoting ethical AI practices, and engaging stakeholders in policy discussions, we can navigate the
complexities of AI's impact on society while minimizing risks. You can build a future that maximizes
the positive contributions of AI.

5.4 Repercussions

The impact of artificial intelligence on society is wide-ranging, touching on many aspects of human
life, from economic and labor market dynamics to ethical considerations and social welfare. The main
impacts are Disruption to the labor market: One of the most significant impacts of AI is its potential
disruption to the labor market. Automation and AI-driven technologies have the potential to replace
human workers in certain jobs and industries, leading to job losses, unemployment, and changes in skill
requirements. While AI may create new job opportunities in emerging industries, the transition could
be particularly disruptive for workers in low-skill or routine jobs. Economic inequality: The
introduction of AI may exacerbate economic inequality by disproportionately benefiting those with

14
access to AI technologies and capabilities and leaving others behind. As productivity gains from AI
benefit capital owners and skilled workers, they could widen socio-economic inequality, leading to
greater concentration of wealth and widening income inequality. Addressing these disparities requires
proactive policies to ensure equitable access to AI education, training, and opportunities. Ethical
dilemmas: AI raises complex ethical dilemmas regarding privacy, security, accountability, and fairness.
Concerns about algorithmic bias, discrimination, and unintended consequences highlight the need for
ethical AI development and deployment practices. AI systems must be designed and regulated to protect
fundamental human rights, prevent harm, and promote transparency and accountability in decision-
making processes. Data Protection and Surveillance: The proliferation of AI-powered surveillance
technologies has raised concerns about privacy violations and mass surveillance. AI algorithms that can
analyze vast amounts of data collected from individuals' online activities, social media profiles, and
public records raise questions about the scope of privacy rights and the balance between security and
civil liberties. Protecting privacy in the age of AI requires strict data protection regulations and
mechanisms for user consent and control of personal data. Social Impact: AI has the potential to
profoundly change social interactions, relationships, and institutions. From AI-powered social media
algorithms that shape information consumption and public discourse to chatbots and virtual assistants
that influence human communication patterns, AI technologies are changing the fabric of society.
Understanding the social impact of AI requires continued research, dialogue, and engagement with
various stakeholders to ensure that AI contributes to the common good and improves human well-being.
Vulnerabilities: AI introduces new security risks and challenges, including vulnerabilities in AI
systems, adversarial attacks, and the use of AI as a weapon for malicious purposes. As AI becomes
increasingly integrated into critical infrastructure, cybersecurity threats pose a risk to national security,
public safety, and economic stability. To mitigate these risks, investment in AI security research,
development of robust cybersecurity measures, and international cooperation to address them are
emerging. New threats are needed. Environmental Impact: The energy consumption and carbon
footprint of AI technologies pose environmental challenges, especially as AI models become larger and
more computationally intensive. Data centers running AI algorithms consume large amounts of energy,
contributing to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. Sustainable AI development requires
optimizing energy efficiency, reducing waste, and exploring alternative computing architectures to
reduce AI's environmental impact.

5.5. Current framework

The current framework for addressing the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on society includes a
wide range of initiatives and strategies aimed at promoting responsible AI development, fostering
innovation, and protecting human rights. The main components of the current framework are:

1. Regulatory Oversight: Governments and international organizations are increasingly introducing

regulations and policies to govern the development, deployment, and use of AI technologies. These
regulations cover areas such as data protection, algorithmic transparency, bias reduction, and AI system

15
accountability. The regulatory framework aims to balance innovation with the protection of individual
rights and social values.

2. Ethical Guidelines: Ethical guidelines and principles for AI are developed by a variety of
stakeholders, including industry associations, research institutions, and interest groups. These
guidelines emphasize values such as fairness, transparency, accountability, and human-centered design
in the development and deployment of AI. Ethical frameworks provide the foundation for responsible
AI governance and promote the ethical use of AI technologies.

3. Research and Development: Investment in AI research and development (R&D) is essential to

advancing the cutting edge of AI, addressing technological challenges, and driving innovation. Public
and private sector investments support interdisciplinary research in areas such as machine learning,
natural language processing, robotics, and AI ethics. Collaborative R&D initiatives foster knowledge
sharing and accelerate AI breakthroughs.

4. Education and awareness: Educational initiatives and awareness campaigns aim to improve public
understanding of AI technology, its potential applications, and its social impact. These initiatives
promote the digital literacy, critical thinking, and ethical reasoning skills needed to navigate an AI-
driven world. Educational programs are aimed at a variety of stakeholders, including students,
educators, policy makers, and the public.

5. International Cooperation: International cooperation and collaboration is essential to address global

challenges in AI governance, standardization, and coordination. Multilateral organizations such as the
United Nations and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are
promoting dialogue and cooperation between countries on AI policy issues. International partnerships
foster a harmonized approach to AI regulation and promote common norms and values.

6. Industry Standards: Industry-led initiatives play a critical role in setting standards and best practices
for AI development and deployment. Technology companies, research institutions, and standards
organizations are collaborating to develop technical standards, certification frameworks, and industry
guidelines for AI systems. Industry standards promote interoperability, reliability, and trustworthiness
of AI technologies.

7. Civil Society Engagement: Civil society organizations and advocacy groups contribute to AI
governance by raising awareness, advocating for policy reform, and holding stakeholders accountable.
Civil society involvement ensures that different perspectives and voices are represented in AI policy
discussions and decision-making processes. Grassroots efforts allow communities to participate in
shaping the future of AI.

8. Ethical AI Innovation: Innovators and entrepreneurs are increasingly incorporating ethical

considerations into the design and development process of AI products. Responsible innovation
practices emphasize ethical principles, user privacy, and social impact, and aim to create AI solutions

16
that benefit society while minimizing potential harm. Ethical AI innovation fosters trust, sustainability,
and positive social outcomes.

6. Resources and support for the delegates

6.1 Inquiry questions

− What steps can be taken to address algorithmic bias and ensure fairness and non-discrimination
in AI systems?
− What is the role of education and training in preparing the workforce for the future in a world
increasingly driven by artificial intelligence?
− What are some of the promising applications of artificial intelligence in healthcare, and how
can the security and privacy of patient data be ensured?
− What has your delegation done regarding the issue?

6.2 QUARMAS

− What are some of the main ethical concerns associated with the use of artificial intelligence in
decision-making, especially in sensitive areas such as health and justice?
− How can governments and international organizations collaborate to establish ethical standards
and regulations for the development and implementation of artificial intelligence?
− What are some of the ways artificial intelligence is transforming the workforce industry, and
what steps can be taken to mitigate potential negative impacts, such as job loss?

6.3 Delegations'’ positions

− Argentina Republic: Argentina has been increasingly investing in AI research and development,
particularly in areas such as agriculture, healthcare, and finance. The country has established
AI research centers and initiatives to foster innovation and collaboration in the field.
− Dominion of Canada: Canada is known for its AI expertise and leadership, with a strong
emphasis on AI research, education, and talent development. The Canadian government has
invested in AI research institutes and initiatives, positioning the country as a global hub for AI
innovation.

17
− Federal Republic of Germany: Germany has been actively promoting AI as part of its
digitalization strategy, with a focus on industrial applications, automation, and smart
manufacturing. The German government supports AI research and innovation through funding
programs and collaborative initiatives.
− Republic of Brazil: Brazil recognizes the potential of AI to drive economic growth and social
development, with initiatives to promote AI research, education, and entrepreneurship. The
Brazilian government has launched AI strategy plans to support innovation and competitiveness
in key sectors.
− French Republic: France is committed to advancing AI research, development, and adoption,
with a focus on ethical AI use and data protection. The French government has invested in AI
research centers and initiatives, aiming to position France as a leader in responsible AI
innovation.
− Islamic Republic of Afghanistan: Afghanistan faces numerous challenges in AI development
due to ongoing conflicts and political instability. However, there is growing recognition of the
potential of AI to address societal issues and promote economic development in the country.
− Islamic Republic of Iran: Iran has been investing in AI research and development, particularly
in areas such as healthcare, agriculture, and transportation. The Iranian government supports
AI initiatives and collaborations to foster innovation and address societal challenges.
− Italian Republic: Italy is actively promoting AI innovation and entrepreneurship, with
initiatives to support research, education, and industrial applications. The Italian government
encourages AI development in key sectors such as healthcare, manufacturing, and mobility.
− Kingdom of Spain: Spain is committed to advancing AI research and adoption, with a focus on
digital transformation and innovation. The Spanish government supports AI initiatives and
partnerships to drive economic growth and improve public services.
− People's Republic of China: China is a global leader in AI research, development, and
deployment, with significant investments in AI technologies and applications. The Chinese
government has launched ambitious AI initiatives to drive innovation and economic
competitiveness.
− Republic of Colombia: Colombia is increasingly recognizing the importance of AI for
economic growth and social development. The Colombian government has initiatives to
promote AI research, education, and entrepreneurship, particularly in areas such as agriculture,
healthcare, and finance.
− Republic of Hungary: Hungary is actively investing in AI research and development to drive
innovation and competitiveness. The Hungarian government supports AI initiatives and
collaborations with industry and academia to address societal challenges and foster economic
growth.

18
 − Republic of India: India has a growing AI ecosystem, with a focus on AI research, talent
development, and entrepreneurship. The Indian government has launched AI initiatives to
support innovation in key sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, and education.
− Republic of Iraq: Iraq is exploring the potential of AI to address societal challenges and promote
economic development, despite facing significant political and security challenges. The Iraqi
government has initiatives to support AI research and education.
− Republic of Korea: South Korea is a global leader in AI innovation and adoption, with a strong
emphasis on AI research, development, and commercialization. The South Korean government
has launched AI strategies and initiatives to drive economic growth and enhance public
services.
− Republic of Turkey: Turkey recognizes the strategic importance of AI for economic
competitiveness and national security. The Turkish government has initiatives to promote AI
research, education, and entrepreneurship, with a focus on developing AI talent and capabilities.
− Russian Federation: Russia has a long history of AI research and development, with significant
expertise in areas such as robotics, natural language processing, and computer vision. The
Russian government supports AI initiatives and collaborations to drive innovation and
economic growth.
− Syrian Arab Republic: Despite facing significant political and humanitarian challenges, Syria
has shown interest in AI development to address societal issues and promote economic
recovery. The Syrian government has initiatives to support AI research and innovation.
− Ukraine: Ukraine is emerging as a hub for AI innovation and entrepreneurship, with a growing
ecosystem of AI startups and research institutions. The Ukrainian government has initiatives to
promote AI research, education, and talent development.
− United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: The UK is a global leader in AI research
and development, with world-class expertise in areas such as machine learning, robotics, and
AI ethics. The UK government has launched AI strategies and initiatives to drive innovation
and economic growth.
− United states of America: The United States of America plays a crucial role in the debate on
the implications and effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on society. As a leader in technology
and innovation, the country drives the development and implementation of AI technologies. It
recognizes both the economic and innovation benefits of AI and the ethical and social
challenges it poses. Through government initiatives and regulations, it seeks to promote the
responsible adoption of AI, ensuring that the technology benefits society and aligns with
American values and principles.

6.4 Recommended sites

19
https://www.interpol.int/es/Como-trabajamos/Innovacion/Manual-sobre-inteligencia-artificial

7. Presidents’ information

Maria Alejandra Hajduk

E-mail: [email protected]

Contact: 3207864319

Valeria Gracia

E-mail: [email protected]

Contact: 324 3453195

8. Bibliography

European Commission. (n.d.). Combating trafficking in cultural goods.

https://culture.ec.europa.eu/cultural-heritage/cultural-heritage-in-eu-policies/protection-against-illicit-
trafficking

Georgiadis, C. and Patias, P. (May 15, 2023). Fighting Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Goods—
The ENIGMA Project. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/10/2579

International Council of Museums. (n.d.). Code of Ethics.

https://icom.museum/en/resources/standards-guidelines/code-of-ethics/

International Criminal Police Organization. (May 6, 2020). 101 arrested and 19,000 stolen
artefacts recovered in international crackdown on art trafficking. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-
and-Events/News/2020/101-arrested-and-19-000-stolen-artefacts-recovered-in-international-
crackdown-on-art-trafficking
International Criminal Police Organization. (n.d.). About Notices.
https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/About-Notices

International Criminal Police Organization. (n.d.). Global Policing Goals.

https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/Strategy/Global-Policing-Goals

International Criminal Police Organization. (n.d.). 1923- how our story started.
https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/INTERPOL-100/1923-how-our-history-started

20
 International Criminal Police Organization. (n.d.). INTERPOL 100.
https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/INTERPOL-100

International Criminal Police Organization. (n.d.). What is INTERPOL?

https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/What-is-INTERPOL

Kastner, E. (July 2, 2020). History of the Dark Web. https://www.soscanhelp.com/blog/history-

of-the-dark-web

Portela, M. (February 14, 2016). Customs, cultural goods and data.

https://mag.wcoomd.org/magazine/wco-news-79/customs-cultural-goods-and-data/

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (n.d.). Art traffickers:
Pillaging people’s identities. https://en.unesco.org/courier/2020-4/art-traffickers-pillaging-peoples-
identities

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Fighting the Illicit
Trafficking of Cultural Property.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/documentViewer.xhtml?v=2.1.196&id=p::usmarcdef_0000266098&file
=/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_af107d64-e593-49d0-
a57a-
dfa9f4ed565d%3F_%3D266098eng.pdf&locale=en&multi=true&ark=/ark:/48223/pf0000266098/PD
F/266098eng.pdf#266098eng%20-%20OK.indd%3A.35680%3A673

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (n.d.). “We must punish the
looters, but also the buyers”. https://en.unesco.org/courier/2020-4/we-must-punish-looters-also-buyers

United States Government Accountability Office. (2016). CULTURAL PROPERTY Protection

of Iraqi and Syrian Antiquities. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-16-673.pdf

World Customs Organization. (n.d.). Cultural Heritage Programme.

https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/enforcement-and-compliance/activities-and-programmes/cultural-
heritage-programme.aspx

World Customs Organization. (n.d.). ARCHEO Connect to preserve.

https://www.wcoomd.org/~/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/enforcement-and-
compliance/activities-and-programmes/cultural-heritage/archeo_brochure_en.pdf?la=en

21