Solicitud Ante El Saren CCS
Cargado por
rosalinadoespiritosanto1Solicitud Ante El Saren CCS
Cargado por
rosalinadoespiritosanto1Common questions
Con tecnología de IAAdministrative delays, such as those experienced by Rosalina, can severely impact individual rights by delaying or denying the fulfillment of legal and constitutional entitlements, such as the right to associate or access justice. These inefficiencies can erode trust in public institutions as citizens may perceive a lack of accountability, transparency, or commitment to procedural justice. In societal terms, such delays propagate a view of governance that is inaccessible and inefficient, potentially diminishing public engagement and cooperation with administrative processes .
Venezuela's constitutional provision ensures administrative transparency through several articles: Article 26 guarantees access to justice; Article 51 mandates authorities to provide timely and appropriate responses; and Article 143 ensures the right to be informed of administrative actions and decisions. However, the procedural challenges faced by Rosalina Do Espirito Santo highlight a significant discrepancy between these legal guarantees and the practical execution of administrative duties. Delays in decision-making and lack of transparent communication reflect a gap in adhering to the principles of administrative efficiency and accountability enshrined in the Constitution .
The directive from the SAREN main office imposed restrictions on local authorities, effectively limiting their capacity to independently process and approve document registrations. The orders to not protocolize certain documents without explicit authorization from the central office undermined the ability of local registrars to exercise discretion and fulfill their administrative duties, leading to delays and procedural inefficiency. This centralization reflects a hierarchical decision-making process that can impede timely local processing and compromise the principles of accessibility and efficacy in public service delivery .
Given the unsatisfactory response from the local register about the foundation's documentation, Rosalina Do Espirito Santo can leverage constitutional rights and administrative laws. Article 26 and Article 51 of the Constitution support her right to access judicial bodies and demand an adequate response from administrative bodies. She could file a hierarchical appeal, as recommended, to challenge the decision and seek intervention from higher administrative authorities or file a complaint based on the violation of administrative procedural rules as established by the Ley Orgánica de Procedimientos Administrativos .
Rosalina Do Espirito Santo faced legal difficulties in the registration process of the act of the Foundation of Social Assistance 'LA VOZ DEL QUE CLAMA EN EL DESIERTO' due to internal orders from the main office in Caracas of SAREN, instructing local offices not to protocolize such documents . Even though administrative procedures were followed, the local Registrars informed her that the decisions depended on higher authorities, and no final approval was given from the main office. Consequently, despite fulfilling document corrections and resubmissions (an essential administrative step), no registration was finalized due to a lack of protocolization authorization from the upper-level decision-makers .
The constitutional articles referenced by Rosalina, specifically Articles 26 and 52, bolster her argument by asserting her rights to effective judicial and administrative processes. Article 26 provides for access to justice and prompt decision-making, reinforcing her expectation of timely processing, while Article 52 ensures her right to associate lawfully. These constitutional provisions collectively support her stance against administrative inertia and underscore her entitlement to a swift and clear administrative response .
SAREN should implement a structured communication protocol that ensures consistent and transparent information flow between its central office and local branches. Training programs to reinforce the understanding and application of constitutional and legal obligations by staff could mitigate procedural delays and enhance decision-making efficiency. Establishing a Feedback and Resolution System can also address concerns timely and align actions across departments, ensuring local authorities can act within legal mandates while maintaining accountability and responsiveness as outlined by public administration principles .
The Supremacy of the Constitution, outlined in Article 7, underscores that all public authority acts are subordinate to constitutional norms. Rosalina's experience, where SAREN's hierarchical directives conflicted with procedural expectations, exemplifies a potential usurpation of her constitutional rights by administrative practices. To rectify such conflicts, judicial review or administrative appeals could be pursued to ensure hierarchical conformity with constitutional tenets, and ultimately, the constitutional court could demand adherence to constitutional rights where administrative overreach is evident .
The principles outlined in Article 141 of Venezuela's Constitution, which include transparency, accountability, efficiency, and participation, are intended to guide public administration. The issues experienced by Rosalina Do Espirito Santo—characterized by delayed responses and lack of protocolization authorization—reveal a failure to adhere to these principles. The decision-making bottleneck at SAREN's main office contrasted sharply with these administrative ideals, hindering efficient service provision and failing to live up to the constitutional promise of transparency and timely public service .
Under Venezuelan law, as stipulated in Article 51, public administrators must provide adequate responses to citizen petitions within a reasonable timeframe. In Rosalina’s case, these responsibilities were neglected because the local Register failed to provide a conclusive decision on her submissions, citing high-level directives. The lack of protocolization without sufficient legal basis or clear communication of the administrative impediments reflects negligence to uphold the duty of promptness and accountability in handling her petition .
