DIMENSIONAMIENTO DE LAS COLUMNAS DE CARBON
YANACOCHA
Capacidad de diseo
Columnas por tren (en serie)
Numero de trenes ( en paralelo)
Flujo de Solucion por tren
Flujo de Solucion por tren
Velocidad de la soluc en la columna
m3/h
ANDRES
OTOCA
1248
5
3
416
1831.61
0.075
82.230
99.921
200
3
1
200
880.58
0.075
82.230
69.283
200
3
1
200
880.58
0.075
82.230
69.283
200
3
1
200
880.58
0.075
82.230
69.283
2.54
1.76
1.76
2.40
7.87
4.52
48.69
37.61
5.77
2.43
26.18
33.64
5.77
2.43
26.18
33.64
COMARSA
8
1
8
35.22
0.075
82.230
13.857
150
3
1
150
660.44
0.075
82.230
60.000
320
3
1
320
1408.93
0.075
82.230
87.636
1.76
0.35
1.52
2.23
5.77
2.43
26.18
33.64
1.15
0.10
1.05
33.64
5.00
1.82
19.64
33.64
2.40
7.30
3.89
41.89
33.64
diametro de la columna d2=gpm*0.4085/vel
m3/h
gpm
feet/seg
m/h
pulg
diametro de la columna d2=gpm*0.4085/vel
Con dos planchas sacamos un diametro de:
Area de la columna
Area de la columna
Flujo especifico
m
feet
m2
feet2
gpm/feet2
Peso de Carbon por Columna
2.5
0.055
1.15
2.9
Densidad aparente del carbon
volumen carbon
altura inicial Ho
Expansin del carbon (experimental)
Expansion (operacin YANACOCHA)
t/m3
m3
m
%
%
0.47
4.255
0.941
1.5
1.9
0.47
6.383
2.624
1.5
1.9
0.47
5.319
2.187
1.5
1.9
0.47
4.255
1.750
1.5
1.9
0.47
0.117
1.203
1.5
1.9
0.47
2.447
1.341
1.5
1.9
0.47
6.170
1.586
1.5
1.9
altura de la columna H expandido
1.79
4.99
4.16
3.32
2.29
2.55
3.01
altura de la columna Hexp
Volumen de Columna
feet
m3
6
8.085
16
12.128
14
10.106
11
8.085
7
0.222
8
4.649
10
11.723
Volumen solucion PLS neto
%volumen
m3
53%
3.830
53%
5.745
53%
4.787
53%
3.830
53%
0.105
53%
2.202
53%
5.553
tiempo de residencia
hr
0.009
0.029
0.024
0.019
0.013
0.015
0.017
tiempo de residencia
min
0.55
1.72
1.44
1.15
0.79
0.88
1.04
tiempo de residencia
seg
33.1
103.4
86.2
68.9
47.4
52.9
62.5
Flujo Sol
m3/h
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
ton
Carbon
1
2
3
4
220
220
220
220
3.1
2.8
2.6
2.0
Tank 5
220
1.5
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION Au ( 200M3/H )LEYSHON
Carbon
Solucion
g/t
g/m3
3,200
9,920
2.000
1,600
4,480
0.950
640
1,664
0.400
215
430
0.200
115
173
0.100
0.050
16,667
Temperatura de la solucion
=
Recuperacion Au de la solucin =
Recuperacion Ag de la solucin =
Flujo Sol
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
1
2
3
4
5
hr
1
Carbon
ton
150
150
150
150
150
150
26C
97.5
73.3
2000
2000
2000
10.2375
5.3625
1.95
hr
36
368.55
193.05
70.2
ley g/m3
Solucion
0.130
0.062
0.026
0.013
cada 3 dias se cosecharia una columna de 2,000 kg de carbon con 368.55 gr Au
Au ( 200M3/H )LEYSHON
PERFOMANCE DE AD
%Efficiencia
%promedio
440.000
2,980
2,160
2,080
1,190
52.5%
57.9%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
10560
21120
on con 368.55 gr Au
865.0
52.1%
20486
%Efficiencia
52.5%
57.9%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
Carbon
oro en
solucion
19.500
9.263
3.900
1.950
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION Ag
Solucion
%Efficiencia %promedio
g/m3
3.000
2.850
5.0%
2.250
21.1%
1.700
24.4%
1.200
0.800
29.4%
33.3%
22.6%
Carbon
Tank A
Tank B
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
C
D
E
F
BUFFELS BED TAPPINGS CIP GOLD ADSORTION TRAIN ( g Au/t)
BATCH 245
Solucion
%Efficiencia
14,658
3.810
6,308
0.845
77.8%
2009
801
399
195
0.162
0.033
0.010
0.004
80.8%
79.6%
69.7%
60.0%
GOLD LOADING PROFILE MOUNT MORGANS CARRUSEL
BATCH 245
Carbon
Solucion
%Efficiencia
Tank 1
3,010
2.530
Tank 2
1,180
1.030
59.3%
Tank 3
870
0.390
62.1%
Tank 4
Tank 5
Tank 6
530
500
250
0.140
0.040
0.020
64.1%
71.4%
50.0%
SORTION TRAIN ( g Au/t)
Carbon
BATCH 245
Solucion
%Efficiencia
13,572
2.490
5,353
0.82
67.1%
1679
701
324
405
0.198
0.039
0.013
0.014
75.9%
80.3%
66.7%
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
1
2
3
4
5
6
PLANTA PILOTO MT BONNIE
Carbon
Solucion
510
2.900
224
1.700
75
0.700
28
0.200
5.5
0.020
0.5
0.015
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION ORO CENTRAL NORSEMAN
Carbon
Solucion
Tank 1
4,980
3.880
Tank 2
2,620
1.620
Tank 3
1,570
0.610
Tank 4
570
0.220
Tank 5
Tank 6
Tank 7
360.00
160
90
0.070
0.025
0.008
%Efficiencia
41.4%
58.8%
71.4%
90.0%
25.0%
%Efficiencia
58.2%
62.3%
63.9%
68.2%
64.3%
68.0%
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION Ag
Carbon
Solucion
%Efficiencia
3,500
2.890
3,040
2.090
27.7%
2,350
1.310
37.3%
1630
0.460
64.9%
970.0
620
250
0.240
0.130
0.250
47.8%
45.8%
-92.3%
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
1
2
3
4
Tank 5
Tank 6
Tank 7
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION ORO CENTRAL SURVEY TENORA
Au en residuo
(g/t)
Carbon
Solucion %Efficiencia %promedio
3.76
0.100
0.96
2.680
0.54
2,350
0.720
73.1%
0.46
1,100
0.200
72.2%
0.42
0.40
0.46
445
280
262
0.080
0.040
0.015
60.0%
50.0%
62.5%
63.6%
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION Ag
Ag en
residuo(g/t)
2.90
2.80
2.40
1.90
1.80
1.60
1.60
Carbon
Solucion
Carbon
%Efficiencia %promedio Au+Ag (g/t)
3,650
3,100
5.220
3.820
2.580
26.8%
32.5%
1,750
900
550
1.460
0.880
0.440
43.4%
39.7%
50.0%
6,000
38.5%
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION ORO PAJINGO
NaCN
%w/v
Au en
residuo
(g/t)
pH
carbon
g/l
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
1
2
3
4
0.003
0.005
0.056
0.052
9.6
10.6
10.9
10.7
6.2 nil
2.5 nil
1.5
0.9
21
16
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
5
6
7
8
0.051
0.043
0.041
0.039
10.6
10.1
10.1
10.1
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
16
17
17
15
Carbon
Solucion
1.16
4.64
1,375
1.06
390
0.32
94
43
24
14
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.01
%Efficie %prome
ncia
dio
77.2%
69.8%
84.4%
60.0%
50.0%
0.0%
68.3%
56.9%
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION ORO PAJINGO
NaCN
%w/v
Au en
residuo
(g/t)
pH
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
1
2
3
4
0.003
0.005
0.056
0.052
9.6
10.6
10.9
10.7
8.15
1.72
1.01
0.89
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
5
6
7
8
0.051
0.043
0.041
0.039
10.6
10.1
10.1
10.1
0.67
0.65
0.69
0.64
carbon
g/l
Carbon
Solucion
0.01
5.56
3,035
2.04
678
0.80
334
120
114
59
0.14
0.05
0.02
0.02
%Efficie %prome
ncia
dio
63.3%
60.8%
82.5%
64.3%
60.0%
0.0%
66.2%
55.1%
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION Ag
Ag en
%Efficie %prom Carbon
residuo(g
ncia
edio
Au+Ag (g/t)
/t)
Carbon Solucion
19.0
4.000
13.0
13.800
8.0
3,680
7.100 48.6%
5,055
1.0
1,870
3.000 57.7%
2,260
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
930
160
240
190
1.500
0.600
0.300
0.200
50.0%
60.0%
50.0%
33.3%
53.3%
49.9%
1,024
203
264
204
PERFOMANCE DE ADSORCION Ag
Ag en
residuo(g
/t)
Carbon
22.0
5.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Solucion
0.10
15.20
13.40
12.20
9.60
5.50
2.90
1.70
%Efficie %prom Carbon
ncia
edio
Au+Ag (g/t)
11.8%
9.0%
3,035
678
21.3%
42.7%
47.3%
41.4%
334
120
114
59
26.4%
28.9%
