This 1901 tobacco trading card captures the spirit of April Fools Day in New York City

March 30, 2026

New York didn’t invent April Fools Day; this holiday might date back all the way to ancient Rome.

But starting in the 19th century, April 1 in Gotham has been a day to celebrate with stupid pranks, outrageous hoaxes, the mocking of politicians and business leaders, and since 1986, a parade down Fifth Avenue.

This 1901 trading card from the American Tobacco Company gets the April Fools spirit right—a mischievous boy, an unsuspecting man, and an escape route into the city after the kid plays his simple prank on his target.

[Image: NYPL Digital Collections]

Before ATMs and apps, there was “commuter banking” inside this Brooklyn subway station

March 30, 2026

If you’ve ever found yourself descending from the Court Street entrance into Brooklyn’s Borough Hall subway station, you may have rushed past it—a blue, subway-tiled corner surrounded by a network of overhead pipes.

The three shuttered metal windows look vaguely institutional, and like the rest of this part of the station, the corner storefront is unattractive and neglected amid excess platform grime.

So you can be forgiven for not stopping and taking a closer look. But only then, when you see the faded words “commuter banking” in black above the metal window frame, will you realize what this strange relic once was.

Beginning in the 1960s, this corner structure served as a branch of the Brooklyn Savings Bank, where tellers sat at the windows and catered to the financial needs of on-the-go postwar Brooklynites.

“Service call buttons are centered on the ledges at the base of the windows where a second inscription states, ‘Banking Hours – Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 6 p.m,'” notes Atlas Obscura in a 2020 article.

“Stainless steel drawers for the exchange of currency and documents are located beneath the teller windows.”

The Brooklyn Savings Bank was founded in 1827, when Brooklyn was just a small town in Kings County. It maintained a prominent presence in Brooklyn Heights until 1990, when the bank became defunct.

The commuter banking idea was actually pretty canny. What better way to reach new customers and provide convenience to existing bankers than by putting a couple of friendly, efficient tellers below ground?

When the branch handled its last transaction isn’t clear, but my guess is the 1980s, as subway crime surged and 24-hour ATMs made their appearance on sidewalk-level branches.

Most in-person banking is now handled by ATMs and banking apps. But isn’t it cool to pass this relic from an era when you had to speak to a human to deposit your paper paycheck, and then have that transaction stamped by the same human in your cardboard bank book?

[Third image: Staten Island Advance; fourth image: Wikipedia]

The spectacular uptown apartment building from 1905 that resembles a Roman aqueduct

March 30, 2026

In the early 1900s, home builders in New York focused their efforts on the northern reaches of Manhattan, churning out speculative rows of spacious brownstones and apartment houses.

Some were designed with creativity and style; others hammered together as quickly as possible to fill with middle and upper-class tenants.

But every so often you spot a survivor of this real-estate frenzy (which all went bust by 1905, when the number of new homes exceeded demand and real-estate development went into a tailspin) that’s so decorative and imaginative, it stops you in your tracks.

That’s what happened when I encountered Arundel Court, aka 772-778 St. Nicholas Avenue—a Renaissance Revival beauty with the glorious arches of a Roman aqueduct and the terra cotta decoration of a European villa.

Though it outshines its tenement-style neighbors, Arundel Court sits on a stretch of St. Nicholas Avenue resplendent with inventive townhouses and a handful of eclectic, stand-alone mansions built by prosperous Gilded Age figures looking for extra space and hillside views far from the crowded hive of the city center.

St. Nicholas Avenue, a wide thoroughfare once famous as a road for horse racing and sleigh riding, had all the makings of the spine of a new upper-class district. Winding from Harlem to Washington Heights and under development at the turn of the 20th century, it was a place where architects could indulge their whims.

That seems to be what Henri Fouchaux did in July 1904, when it was announced that he would design a six-story, 30-unit flat—the preferred term at the time for a multifamily residence, to distinguish it from a tenement. The flat would be roughly 200 feet south of 150th Street, according to the Real Estate Record & Guide.

Fouchaux isn’t well-known in contemporary New York City. But at the turn of the 20th century, this American architect born to French parents was a prolific designer of factories, institutional buildings, and residential properties, especially in the developing neighborhoods north and west of Central Park.

He seemed to be attracted to Uptown Manhattan, designing six groups of row houses and two apartment buildings on or near St. Nicholas Avenue. That’s according to the Landmarks Preservation Commission’s (LPC) historic district report from 2000 on Hamilton Heights/Sugar Hill, where Arundel Court is located.

What inspired him to create the unusual facade of Arundel Court is a mystery. He might have been struck by the grace of the High Bridge, with its harmony of arches supporting a slender span across the Harlem River.

Or perhaps he borrowed the dramatic arches from The Dorilton, a luxury apartment-hotel on West 71st Street completed in 1902 and marked by a central arch, as the LPC report suggests.

Arundel Court, a name that lent a whiff of English and French to Upper Manhattan, was completed in 1905. The building stretched back to Edgecombe Avenue and featured a similar yet much less dramatic facade (fourth photo).

Real estate ads at the time touted the 4, 6, and 7-room suites (for $40 to $70 per month). Arundel Court also boasted of an elevator and all-night “hall service,” which meant that building staff were on hand to assist residents with their needs.

Who were its earliest residents? A mix of professionals and their families who sometimes made the news.

There was the doctor whose wife planned to marry state senator Patrick H. McCannon; the banker who charged a telegraph operator with extortion; the real estate appraiser who died in his apartment and left behind eight children.

Saddest of all was the salesman who died by suicide in 1913, found “in his rooms” with “a gas tube in his mouth.” And the 1922 death of a banker’s private secretary, who had a nervous breakdown as well as “dilation of the heart.” She lived at Arundel Court with her mother, sister, and three brothers.

By the mid-1920s, the only Gotham publication reporting anything about Arundel Court was the New York Age, the leading weekly covering the city’s Black population. Fueled by the Great Migration and the availability of new housing, St. Nicholas Avenue became home to many prominent African American New Yorkers.

The Age reported on artists and musicians now living in the building, as well as the marriages, anniversaries, and funerals of residents, plus dances and other social functions held in apartments.

These days, the lower level of Arundel Court is behind scaffolding. The tiled lobby has space on the ceiling for a grand chandelier, but it’s now lit by a florescent bulb.

But sunlight and fresh air still flood the front and interior windows, and what looks like a new cornice unites the three grand arches. I don’t know what’s going on with this stunning building, but I can’t wait for its next act to be unveiled.

[Third image: NYC Department of Records & Information Services; Fifth image: New York Times]

The ghostly remains of a legendary longtime Upper East Side movie theater

March 23, 2026

Stores come and go; office buildings gain and lose tenants. But the grief really hits when a shuttered movie theater remains empty, stripped of posters, concession signs, even the theater’s name.

This is what remains of the Beekman Theater at 1271 Second Avenue, between 65th and 66th Streets. It showed its last film before abruptly closing its doors in 2019, according to an article by Brendan Krisel in Patch.

For years after its demise, the Beekman name, with its unique (Art Deco?) typeface, stayed on the marquee. At some point recently it was removed and then marred by graffiti.

Old-school cinephiles know that this was not the original Beekman Theater. “The Beekman first opened its doors as a single-screen theater in 1952, but later shut down in 2005 when the site was redeveloped into a new cancer research center by Memorial Sloan-Kettering,” explained Patch.

“Then operators of the Beekman, Clearview Cinemas, renamed its New York One & Two theater across the street after the Beekman in 2008.”

Its most recent incarnation was not necessarily beloved by visitors, based on old Yelp reviews. And the end of a movie house is not exactly a surprise in the era of Netflix and changing entertainment tastes.

Nonetheless the empty space serves as a creeping reminder that decades ago New York audiences supported all kinds of theaters, from mass market multiscreens to indie cinemas.

All that remains today at the old Beekman is the lonely “box office” sign.

[Second image: Brendan Krisel/Patch]

This delightful East Village faux carriage house was built in 1891 for sculptors, not horses

March 23, 2026

If you’ve ever rounded the corner at Second Avenue and East 13th Street, then you’ve probably been charmed by it—a lilliputian-size confection of a house with a bright red front door and mansard roof.

Adding to the whimsy is the fact that the little brick dwelling, with its wrought-iron fence and supersize upper floor windows, sits at 249 ½ East 13th Street, a rare fractional address in the East Village.

The fractional address is a clue that the carriage house hit the streetscape after the two taller buildings on either side of it. And the bronze plaque on the facade tips you off that this relative newcomer to the neighborhood has a colorful origin story.

Dating back to 1891, the house served as the short-lived studio for sculptors Karl Bitter and Giuseppe Moretti. Their names may not be familiar to residents of Gotham today, but each left an enduring mark on the city.

Austrian-born Bitter (at left) created the bronze sculpted doors of Trinity Church, as well as statues of German-American figures like Franz Sigel on Riverside Drive and Carl Schurz in Morningside Park.

He also designed the relief sculpture at The Breakers, the 70-room Newport home of Cornelius Vanderbilt II and his wife, Alice.

Moretti (below right), an immigrant from Italy, is known for his work with Richard Morris Hunt carving marble friezes and statues at Marble House, the Newport “summer cottage” of William K. and Alva Vanderbilt.

In addition, Moretti sculpted the bronze “Polyhymnia” statue that now sits in a courtyard at 6 East 87th Street.

How did the two sculptors connect and end up sharing a studio? In the early 1890s, both Bitter and Moretti were living at 215 Second Avenue, the tenement on the corner of East 13th Street that abuts the little house.

Why they decided to create a shared studio space together isn’t clear. But it appears they approached the owner of 215 Second Avenue about constructing a studio disguised as a carriage house in the backyard of the tenement, which at the time was an empty lot.

Once completed, Moretti was listed as the owner, though both their names were carved into the facade.

“Built in the rear yard of neighboring 215 Second Avenue, [the carriage house] was constructed in 1891 as a sculptor’s studio at a time when rear stables were frequently converted to artist’s studios,” noted Village Preservation in a 2019 post.

“As a result, the building was designed to look like it was originally a stable, though it never was (a conceit which became more and more common with artist’s studios built in New York in the early 20th century, such as on MacDougal Alley and Washington Mews).”

With the open space and sunlight that streamed through the upper floor windows, you would imagine Bitter and Moretti used the studio built specifically for them for several years.

But the two actually departed the space after just one year. “Whether because of clashing egos, as some have suggested, or simply because of commissions that took them elsewhere, they did not share the Manhattan studio after 1891,” wrote Ruth Beaumont Cook, author of Magic in Stone: The Sylacauga Marble Story.

Bitter went on to pursue sculpture commissions across the United States. His death in 1915 occurred in New York, however. On April 10 of that year, he was killed by a car that swerved into him on Broadway as he was leaving the Metropolitan Opera House.

Moretti also followed commissions across the Midwest and Southwest. He retired to Italy in 1925 and died in San Remo a decade later.

And their delightful studio? Another sculptor, Frank Lopez, occupied it in 1899, according to Christopher Gray in a 2003 New York Times streetscapes column. The space was sold in 1906, and a 1940 photo (above) doesn’t show any commercial or artistic activity.

Today the faux carriage house is a private home. Last year, the entire building was advertised for rent. These interior photos show rustic brick walls, a wall of front windows, one decent-size second floor bedroom, and two bathrooms for $7,500 per month.

Considering the going rates for living space in the East Village these days, I’d say it was something of a bargain for a delightful little house with a true artistic legacy.

[Third photo: Wikipedia; fourth photo: Encyclopedia of Alabama; sixth photo: NYC Department of Records & Information Services]

The enduring phantom outline of a long-gone early 19th century house on Bond Street

March 16, 2026

Bond Street today is a pricey place to live. And so it was in the 1830s, when it became one of New York’s most exclusive enclaves.

Wealthy residents fleeing the crowded and increasingly commercial neighborhoods below Houston Street sought refuge on this short little street, which only runs two blocks from Broadway to the Bowery.

To accommodate these fashionable residents, Federal-style houses, typically three or four stories of brick, white trim, dormer windows, and sometimes Classical columns around the entrance, went up in tidy rows.

Most wouldn’t last, of course. Business and industry arrived in the middle of the 19th century, and homeowners who had the means left for newer neighborhoods.

One by one, almost all of the Federal-style homes—which would have been deemed too small for a family home by Gilded Age standards—met the wrecking ball, replaced by commercial buildings.

But the Federal-style house that once stood at 22 Bond Street, just east of Broadway, refuses to completely leave the cityscape.

Its faded, ghostly outline—the peaked roof, the twin chimneys—persist on the side of its former neighbor at 24 Bond Street.

This sweet old house likely looked exactly like the red-brick survivor at 26 Bond Street, which seems to have only been modernized with a fire escape on the facade and air conditioner in one of the dormers.

I don’t know when the house at 22 Bond Street was torn down. But it must have happened in the early 20th century, as the above image from 1940 shows the small squat garage that took its place for several decades.

That 1940 photo also shows the outline of the phantom house, a remnant of antebellum New York that stubbornly rejects the idea of fading into history.

[Third image: NYC Department of Records & Information Services]

A 1907 luxury apartment house on Riverside Drive becomes “a slum with a view” a half-century later

March 16, 2026

When plans were announced in 1906 for the Hendrik Hudson apartment building, newspapers eagerly reported its unusually luxurious features.

“The facade in scheme would be that of an Italian villa,” wrote New York Times, calling out the limestone, brick, and terra cotta building materials to be used for this new 8-story residence at 380 Riverside Drive, which would span 110th to 111th Streets.

“The Riverside Drive elevation will have two towers connected at the roof connected by a pergola. There will be nine apartments on a floor, consisting of six, seven, eight, and nine rooms, with two and three baths.”

By the time it opened a year later, The Hendrik Hudson took its place as New York’s newest high-class apartment building.

“Amenities included a billiard room, café, and barber shop, which along with its magnificent views of Riverside Park attracted many new tenants,” wrote The West Side Rambler in 2016.

The close proximity to the new subway stop at 110th Street added convenience to its fashionable features, which included a red tiled roof and beautifully carved (if somewhat unsettling) figures at the entrance, along with a proud “HH” monogram in terra cotta.

And as the 1915 ad (above) boasts, the roof contains a “children’s playground” and the gym offers “needle baths”—basically jets on the sides of the shower spraying water horizontally.

It was the latest of the elegant apartment houses to go up along the Morningside Heights section of Riverside Drive, bringing stye and exclusivity to an area that a generation earlier had been sparsely settled countryside.

With so much going for this posh palace, it’s hard to believe that just five decades later, the Hendrik Hudson would be harshly denounced by community advocates as “a slum with a view.”

It’s unclear who exactly coined that phrase, but it stuck for years. (Above, a Columbia Daily Spectator headline from the 1950s.)

So what happened to bring on the building’s decline? A couple of factors appear to play a role.

The building survived the financial panic of 1907 and the Depression. But by the 1940s and into the postwar years, wealthy residents left and the neighborhood faced an economic downturn, per The West Side Rambler.

Then, the 1943 introduction of rent control—supposedly a wartime stopgap to ease housing shortages—”limited the profitability of landlords, who nevertheless maintained their buildings in their prewar form,” wrote Andrew Alpern, architectural historian and author of Luxury Apartment Houses of Manhattan: An Illustrated History.

“This law encouraged the conversion of grand old apartments into multiple units, the subdivisions being done as cheaply as possible. . . . Subjected to overcrowding and further subdivision into single-room occupancies, the Hendrik Hudson deteriorated rapidly,” continued Alpern.

By the 1950s, the Hendrik Hudson had become the Hendrik Hudson Hotel, and its 72 spacious apartments now 301 separate one-room units, according to a 1958 New York Times piece.

“A six-year resident said that fights, marijuana-smoking, dope-needling, and prostitution were rampant on Saturday nights,” reported the Times.

Following the death of a 14-year-old boy in a malfunctioning elevator that year, the building was hit with “47 violations of the housing law, including faulty elevators, defective and leaking faucets, and accumulation of rubbish, junk and disused furniture,” wrote the Columbia Daily Spectator.

The outcry from community groups and city housing officials led to new ownership of the Hendrik Hudson in 1960. After much investment and the restoration of multiple-room apartments, the building was converted to a co-op in 1970.

In the ensuing decades, Riverside Drive became a desired residential avenue again. Today, the Hendrik Hudson resembles the Tuscan villa it originally was—without its red roof tiles and one of the towers, alas.

Want to learn more about the hidden history of Riverside Drive’s oldest apartment buildings? A few spaces are still open for Ephemeral New York’s Gilded Age Riverside Drive walking tour this Sunday, March 22 at 1 p.m. It’s the first tour of 2026—sign up here!

[Top image: NYPL Digital Collections; second image: MCNY, X2010.11.3129]

A troubled recluse with a camera obsessively walked the streets to chronicle postwar New York City

March 16, 2026

Some of the best street photographers are outsiders who stalk the city anonymously, blending into the concrete and crowds as they filter tender fleeting moments through their own emotional lens.

Angelo Antonio Rizzuto, an unlikely street photographer who went unnoticed as he captured more than 60,000 images of the postwar city, fits this description perfectly.

Rizzuto’s early days seem idyllic, but his was a turbulent life. Born in 1906 in South Dakota, this son of a Sicilian construction company owner grew up in Omaha, graduated college in Ohio, and made it to Harvard Law School in the early 1930s.

After his father’s death and a suicide attempt prompted by infighting over the family estate, Rizzuto’s life took a dark turn.

Mental illness set in. Instead of finishing his Harvard degree, he joined the army, and after a medical discharge drifted across the country doing odd jobs before settling in Manhattan.

Armed with a camera and a new identity as Anthony Angel, he spent years promptly leaving his rented room on East 51st Street to crisscross the city, an unlikely documentarian of ordinary glimpses during Gotham’s postwar years.

“On almost every afternoon from 1952 to 1966, [Rizzuto] left his crummy rented room to snap pictures on the New York streets,” wrote New York magazine in 2005.

“The rest of the day he spent shunning company, writing delusional anti-Semitic letters to politicians, and striving to patent an improved stepladder, with the single-mindedness of a recluse and the meticulous obsessiveness of a paranoid schizophrenic,” continued New York.

What caught his attention? The bigness of the city’s skyscrapers, parks, bridges, and fences. Attracted to these geometric forms, he sometimes shot sweeping views from high above.

Rizzuto was also drawn to sensitive moments of loneliness and alienation on the faces of average, unglamorous New Yorkers. Some mugged for the camera, but most were oblivious.

“If you look at enough of Angel’s work, you can see some recurring themes—cats and dogs, children, storefronts, people on the subway and in train stations, and nuns,” states a 2021 blog post from the Library of Congress, which has the Anthony Angel Collection in their holdings.

“He used architectural elements such as railings, lamp posts, and windows as compositional elements in his photos,” continued the Library of Congress post.

But what compelled him to obsessively take photos day after day, then develop them using equipment he stored in a brownstone purchased with the proceeds of his deceased brother’s estate?

He never actually lived in that brownstone, also on East 51st Street. Instead, he preferred his cramped and sparely furnished rented room.

Rizzuto (at right in a self-portrait) had a plan for his photos; he hoped to publish them in a book he titled “Little Old New York.” He never got the chance.

Dying of cancer in 1967, he bequeathed thousands of dollars and his entire photo collection to the Library of Congress, instructing them to use the money to produce his book.

The Library of Congress accepted the bequest and “dutifully published a booklet bound with staples, illustrated with perhaps 60 indifferently printed reproductions of the dead man’s pictures,” wrote photo historian Michael Lesy, author of Angel’s World, a 2006 book about Rizzuto that features dozens of his images.

“It then proceeded to spend his money,” continued Lesy.

Years ago, while doing research at the Library of Congress, Lesy came across hundreds of Rizzuto’s obsessively organized contact sheets stuffed in folders, unseen for decades.

This discovery led him to try to excavate the life of this troubled outsider, which he does skillfully and with sensitivity in his 2006 book.

“In a way, he could have been Leopold Bloom, scampering through squares of private meaning, or Prufrock, wandering through certain half-deserted streets, or Krapp, holding his endless spools of tape up to the light,” wrote Lesy.

“The pictures he made were acts of homage and appropriation, elements in an iconography of a city permeated by a self.”

[Photos: Anthony Angel Collection at the Library of Congress]

The darkness at the center of an Impressionist’s snowy New York dreamscape

March 9, 2026

Working out of his studio on Fifth Avenue and 17th Street, Frederick Childe Hassam painted luminous daytime street scenes and moody nocturnes of New York City in the 1880s and 1890s.

As one of the foremost American Impressionists, Hassam’s work emphasized the city’s softness and blurred edges with short brushstrokes that conveyed the spontaneity and vitality of the Gilded Age metropolis.

But what to make of “New York Blizzard,” which Hassam painted around 1890? The blue and white sky, gently obscured buildings, and pillowy snow are characteristic of his style.

The striking saturated blackness of faceless, almost formless pedestrians in the center of the canvas is unusual. New Yorkers at the time typically wore lots of black, but these figures in black coats and umbrellas look almost surreal amid this winter dreamscape of light and color.

The immediacy of the scene puts viewers in that snowy street, likely a side street where the gas lamppost has yet to be replaced by the new electric lights already illuminating Broadway and Fifth Avenue.

“In A New York Blizzard, Childe Hassam evoked with vivid calligraphy a few well-dressed pedestrians buffeted by blowing snow,” states the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, which has this painting in its collection. (Hassam, in a self-portrait at left, was born in Boston to an old New England family.)

“The monochromatic triad of silhouetted black coats and umbrellas, white snow, and gray paper suggests Hassam’s interest in flat pattern and design, which accords with his selective—not journalistic—interpretation of ‘his own time,’” per the Gardner Museum.

I also like “New York Blizzard” as a visceral reminder that even though the days are longer and temperatures warmer, another snowstorm could be on its way—we’re not out of the woods yet!

The most difficult to find Revolutionary War memorial hides in the woods of Upper Manhattan

March 9, 2026

There are easier ways to explore New York City’s Revolutionary War backstory. For starters, you could get a drink at Fraunces Tavern on Pearl Street, where George Washington celebrated the evacuation of the British Army in 1783.

You could visit the Old Stone House in Brooklyn, which commemorates the bitterly fought Battle of Brooklyn in 1776. Or head to the Dyckman Farmhouse Museum on Broadway and 207th Street to view a rebuilt wood hut where Hessian soldiers took shelter while on the side of the British.

But if you’re up for an adventure and don’t care if your shoes get muddy, make your way to Fort Washington Park just north of the George Washington Bridge.

Beyond an 1840s wood railroad trestle and up a trail in the woods above the Hudson River sits a curious monument made of stones and a little cement.

“American Redout 1776” the oblong boulder reads. On a smaller stone “Fort Washington Chapter, DAR 1910” is chiseled into the rock face.

What’s it all about? “The marker represents the western end of the fortification that included Fort Washington,” notes the Historical Marker Database. “The fort fell on November 16, 1776, and the British occupied Manhattan for the remainder of the Revolutionary War.”

This was a bruising defeat for the Continental forces, who were badly outnumbered by British and Hessian troops. Many of the survivors of the battle were captured and brought to the horrid prison ships docked at Brooklyn’s Wallabout Bay.

The marker uses an antiquated spelling of redoubt, which is a temporary or supplementary fortification outpost. The DAR are the Daughters of the American Revolution, who unveiled this unusual monument during a dedication ceremony in November 1910.

A New York Times article on the ceremony stated that the point of commemorating a terrible defeat was simply “to keep the battle in remembrance.”

It’s a small and almost impossible to find monument, but it says a lot about New York’s outsized role during the Revolution and the need for later generations of residents to honor its significance.