Join Our Network
Get a Consultation

eLuma's Blog for Educators & Providers

Rearview shot of students raising their hands during a lesson with a teacher in a classroom

Student Behavioral Health Support: 7 Lessons From 500+ School Districts

Student behavior is the biggest challenge educators expect to face this school year. In a 2026 survey of more than 1,000 teachers and administrators, 75% called it a major challenge for 2026-27, ranking it ahead of everything else on a list of 27 options. Almost as many (71%) said behavior had worsened over the past year. None of this surprises the people who run student services. They see it in referral lists that keep getting longer and in the growing stack of requests for evaluations and behavior plans. On most days, teachers ask for help faster than one team can provide it. Behavior and mental health needs tend to rise together, and meeting them takes skilled people who can catch concerns early and follow through. Those people are hard to find right now, which is a big reason student behavioral health support has become such a pressing issue for district leaders. Since 2011, eLuma has worked with 500+ districts to help close that gap. Over the years, the student support teams we work with have taught us a lot about what makes this work hold up, and the lessons below are the breakthroughs that come up again and again. Key

Featured Posts

The Compliance and Budget Risk of Unfilled Special Education Positions

“We posted the job. We had zero applicants.” That’s a direct quote from Mike Leddy, Director of Student Services in Kenton, Ohio, and it perfectly describes the reality in districts across the country right now. A service provider or special education teacher role sits open, and everyone waits for a resume that doesn’t come. Existing staff do their best to pick up what they can in the meantime, but prolonged vacancies have a deeper cost, and it adds up every day the role stays open. Key Takeaways An unfilled special education position costs more than the hire itself, in compensatory services, legal settlements, and overtime. Districts that settle special education disputes before a hearing pay an average of $23,827 per case. Written state complaints rose 46% during the 2025-26 school year, tracking directly with the special education staffing shortage. IDEA evaluation windows and IEP service minutes don’t pause for an open role. A missed timeline becomes a compliance violation. The Fiscal Cost Adds Up Fast, and Rarely Easy to Estimate An unfilled special education position can cost a district more in compensatory services, legal fees, and overtime than the hire itself. Replacing staff costs districts upward of $20,000 per hire,

How Did We Get Here? What a Manifestation Determination Review Reveals About District Capacity

Ten days of removal. One legal question: Was the behavior connected to a disability? That is all a manifestation determination review decides. For a district leader, it is also the wrong place to start looking for answers. By the time this meeting is on the calendar, a team with an IEP, a written behavior plan, and a compliance tracker has already missed months of chances to address the pattern early. Our free webinar, Manifestation Determination and the Services You Still Owe, covers what the law requires once a district gets here. This blog explains how districts reach a manifestation determination in the first place, and what it takes to close the gap before they do. Key Takeaways A Manifestation Determination Review (MDR) is an IEP team meeting required under IDEA when a disciplinary removal constitutes a change in placement, typically when removals exceed 10 cumulative school days in a school year. The purpose of an MDR is specific but significant: to determine whether the student’s behavior was caused by, or had a direct and substantial relationship to, their disability. This determination guides whether the school may proceed with disciplinary action as it would for a student without a disability. Removals

MTSS Implementation Challenges in Schools: What It Actually Takes to Make It Work

You built the framework, defined the tiers, and selected the interventions. You cross-checked every resource against the pyramid graphic in that expert’s PD slides. Then the data comes in: office discipline referrals keep climbing, Tier 3 stays full, and staff describe the process as optional, something they remember on a good week and let slide on a busy one. That gap between what your MTSS framework is designed to do and what happens in classrooms is where most districts get stuck, and the research points to a consistent explanation. MTSS implementation challenges come down to whether Tier 2 and Tier 3 run with fidelity, the same way, for every student, every week. Building that kind of consistency takes staffing capacity, coaching structure, and data infrastructure, sustained over time. Before you look at which Tier 2 interventions to add or swap out, it’s worth understanding why the ones you already chose aren’t holding. Key Takeaways Most districts already know what Tier 2 should look like; what breaks down is whether it happens the same way every time, for every student. School psychologists, who carry much of the individualized counseling, evaluation, and behavior support behind Tier 2 and Tier 3, are stretched

Articles For Schools

parent teacher meeting

Articles For Clinicians