「Denied」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(18ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The function of determining whether or not an application for grant of patent should be allowed or denied under the facts disclosed in the application and in the references consulted by the Examiner and under the applicable law (statutory and decisional), is a quasi-judicial function and involves the exercise of judicial discretion. Thus, with respect to such function, the Director cannot lawfully exercise direct control, direction and supervision over the Examiners but only general supervision, exercised through a review of the recommendation they may make for the grant of patent and of other actions, and through a review of their adverse decisions by petition or appeal.例文帳に追加

出願において及び審査官が参照した引例において明らかにされた事実並びに適用法(制定法及び判例法)に基づき特許出願を認めるべきか又は拒絶すべきかを決定する職務は，準司法的な職務であり，司法裁量権の行使を伴う。 従って，当該職務に関しては，局長は，審査官に対して直接的な管理，指揮及び監督を合法的に行うことはできず，特許付与及びその他の処分について審査官によってされる勧告の検討を通じて，また，申請又は不服申立に基づき審査官がなした不利な決定の検討を通じて統括的な監督のみを行うことができる。 - 特許庁

For example, if the pertinent combination corresponds to the followings, in most cases, it is reasoned that a person skilled in the art would have easily arrived at the claimed medicinal invention and the inventive step is usually denied (Example 8 to 11): (a) combination of publicly known components of which major effects are the same, (b) combination of a major component having a publicly known problems related to the efficacy thereof with a subordinate component having publicly known ability to eliminate the problem (for example, in case of the combination of the major component having a publicly known side effect and a subordinate component having a publicly known ability of reducing the side effect), and (c) combination of publicly known components having respective curative effects for a variety of symptoms arising from a major disease, and the like. 例文帳に追加

例えば、該組合せが、(a) 主作用が同じである公知の成分同士の組合せ、(b) 公知の主成分の効能に係る問題を解消することができる公知の副成分との組合せ (例えば、副作用を有することが公知の主成分と、その副作用を減弱させることができる公知の副成分との組合せ )、(c)主疾病から生じる種々の症状のそれぞれに治療効果を有することが公知の成分の組合せ、等の場合には、引用発明に基づいて、当業者が請求項に係る医薬発明を容易に想到し得たものであることを論理づけできる場合が多く、通常、請求項に係る医薬発明の進歩性は否定される (事例 8～11)。 - 特許庁

The application for injunction or restraining order may further be denied, or, if granted, may be dissolved, if it appears after hearing that although the applicant is entitled to the injunction or restraining order, the issuance or continuance thereof, as the case may be, would cause irreparable damage to the party or person enjoined while the applicant can be fully compensated for such damages as he may suffer, and the former files a bond in an amount fixed by the Hearing Officer, conditioned that he will pay all damages which the applicant may suffer by the denial or the dissolution of the injunction or restraining order.例文帳に追加

申請人に差止命令又は一時差止命令の権利がある場合であっても，聴聞後，その命令の発令又は存続が禁止命令を受けた当事者又は人物に回復不能の損害をもたらすことになるような場合は，申請人が被る可能性のある損害を十分に補償され得る限り，前者は，差止命令又は一時差止命令の却下又は取消によって申請人が被る可能性のあるすべての損害を支払うことを条件として，聴聞官の定める額の保証金を供託することができ，かかる場合，差止命令又は一時差止命令の申請は，その後に却下されること，また，認められたとしても取り消されることがある。 - 特許庁

Article 105 (1) Where, in an investigation of rehabilitation claims, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. has disapproved the content of a rehabilitation claim or an objection has been made by any holder(s) of filed rehabilitation claim with regard to this matter, the holder of filed rehabilitation claim who holds the rehabilitation claim in question (hereinafter referred to as the "denied/disputed rehabilitation claim"), in order to determine the content of the claim, may file a petition for assessment to the court against the rehabilitation debtor as well as said holder(s) of filed rehabilitation claim who made the objection (hereinafter referred to as the "denying/disputing party" in this Article to Article 107 and Article 109); provided, however, that this shall not apply in the case referred to in Article 107(1) and Article 109(1) and (2). 例文帳に追加

第百五条　再生債権の調査において、再生債権の内容について再生債務者等が認めず、又は届出再生債権者が異議を述べた場合には、当該再生債権（以下「異議等のある再生債権」という。）を有する再生債権者は、その内容の確定のために、当該再生債務者等及び当該異議を述べた届出再生債権者（以下この条から第百七条まで及び第百九条において「異議者等」という。）の全員を相手方として、裁判所に査定の申立てをすることができる。ただし、第百七条第一項並びに第百九条第一項及び第二項の場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Meanwhile, as I said just now, it cannot be denied that the company had a problem from the viewpoint of the need to establish proper information management and business operation systems suited to its business diversification and internationalization. In addition, it is desirable for the company to establish a system that will enable it to identify and take the necessary additional measures without any delay once its business has diversified and internationalized further in the future or when the market environment changes - namely, an enhanced level of internal control system that will enable dynamic responses. We issued a business improvement order to the company from this perspective, with a view to protecting the public interest and investors. We will require the company to implement the recurrence prevention measures steadily and effectively and, as I said earlier, to establish an internal control system that will enable it to respond quickly to changes in the market environment. 例文帳に追加

他方で、今も申し上げましたように同社の業務の多様化、国際化という点に着目した場合、これに即した適切な情報管理態勢、業務運営態勢という観点からは問題点がなかったとはいえないということ、また今後の業務の更なる多様化・国際化や、あるいは環境の変化といったものが生じたときに、これに応じて新たに必要となる追加的な措置を自ら特定し遅滞なく実施に移すための態勢、そういったいわばダイナミックな対応といった一段高い水準の内部管理態勢を構築していただくことが望ましいと、こういった点を踏まえまして、公益、または投資者保護の観点から同社に対して業務改善命令を発出したところでございまして、同社において今後、再発防止策の実効性をともなった着実な実施、あるいは今も申し上げた市場環境の変化に即応できる内部管理態勢の構築といったものを求めていくものであります。 - 金融庁

Article 247 (1) Where the court makes an order of commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the content and cause of each bankruptcy claim filed in the bankruptcy proceedings to be stayed pursuant to the provision of Article 39(1), the number of denied/disputed bankruptcy claims prescribed in the main clause of Article 125(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, whether or not any liquidating distribution will be made through the bankruptcy proceedings, and any other circumstances concerned, it may make an order, upon making said order of commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, to the effect that rehabilitation creditors who hold rehabilitation claims that have been filed as bankruptcy proceedings in said bankruptcy proceedings (excluding claims that have been filed as preferred bankruptcy claims prescribed in Article 98(1) of said Act and claims for fine, etc. prescribed in Article 97(vi) of said Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not be required to file proofs of such rehabilitation claims. 例文帳に追加

第二百四十七条　裁判所は、再生手続開始の決定をする場合において、第三十九条第一項の規定により中止することとなる破産手続において届出があった破産債権の内容及び原因、破産法第百二十五条第一項本文に規定する異議等のある破産債権の数、当該破産手続における配当の有無その他の事情を考慮して相当と認めるときは、当該決定と同時に、再生債権であって当該破産手続において破産債権としての届出があったもの（同法第九十八条第一項に規定する優先的破産債権である旨の届出があった債権及び同法第九十七条第六号に規定する罰金等の請求権を除く。以下この条において同じ。）を有する再生債権者は当該再生債権の届出をすることを要しない旨の決定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 253 (1) Where the court (meaning a judge or panel of judges in charge of the bankruptcy case; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following Article) makes an order of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings prescribed in the items of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article or in paragraph (3) of said Article, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the content and cause of each rehabilitation claim as well as the amount of the voting right as filed in the rehabilitation proceedings that are closed, the number of denied/disputed rehabilitation claims prescribed in the main clause of Article 105(1), whether or not any right will be modified by a rehabilitation plan and the content of such modification, and any other circumstances concerned, it may make an order, upon making said order of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, to the effect that bankruptcy creditors who hold bankruptcy claims that have been filed as rehabilitation claims in said rehabilitation proceedings (excluding claims for fine, etc. arising prior to the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not be required to file proofs of such bankruptcy claims. 例文帳に追加

第二百五十三条　裁判所（破産事件を取り扱う一人の裁判官又は裁判官の合議体をいう。次項において同じ。）は、前条第一項各号又は第三項に規定する破産手続開始の決定をする場合において、終了した再生手続において届出があった再生債権の内容及び原因並びに議決権の額、第百五条第一項本文に規定する異議等のある再生債権の数、再生計画による権利の変更の有無及び内容その他の事情を考慮して相当と認めるときは、当該決定と同時に、破産債権であって当該再生手続において再生債権としての届出があったもの（再生手続開始前の罰金等を除く。以下この条において同じ。）を有する破産債権者は当該破産債権の届出をすることを要しない旨の決定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 125 (1) Where, in an investigation of bankruptcy claims, a bankruptcy trustee has disapproved the amount of a bankruptcy claim or the type of the claim, namely, preferred bankruptcy claim, subordinate bankruptcy claim or consensually-subordinated bankruptcy claim (hereinafter referred to as the "amount, etc." in this Article and Article 127(1)) or an objection has been made by any holder(s) of filed bankruptcy claim with regard to these matters, the holder(s) of filed bankruptcy claim who holds the bankruptcy claim in question (thereinafter referred to as the "denied/disputed bankruptcy claim"), in order to determine the amount and type of the claim, may file a petition to the court, against said bankruptcy trustee as well as said holder(s) of filed bankruptcy claim who made the objection (hereinafter referred to as the "denying/disputing party" in this Subsection), for assessment of the amount, etc. of the claim (hereinafter referred to as a "petition for bankruptcy claim assessment"); provided, however, that this shall not apply in the case referred to in Article 127(1) and Article 129(1) and (2). 例文帳に追加

第百二十五条　破産債権の調査において、破産債権の額又は優先的破産債権、劣後的破産債権若しくは約定劣後破産債権であるかどうかの別（以下この条及び第百二十七条第一項において「額等」という。）について破産管財人が認めず、又は届出をした破産債権者が異議を述べた場合には、当該破産債権（以下「異議等のある破産債権」という。）を有する破産債権者は、その額等の確定のために、当該破産管財人及び当該異議を述べた届出をした破産債権者（以下この款において「異議者等」という。）の全員を相手方として、裁判所に、その額等についての査定の申立て（以下「破産債権査定申立て」という。）をすることができる。ただし、第百二十七条第一項並びに第百二十九条第一項及び第二項の場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム