Showing posts with label books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label books. Show all posts

Monday, 4 January 2016

Battle of Austerlitz - the play-test


Having read an article about Napoleon's Battle of Austerlitz (1805),  I got it in my mind to create a scenario for this famous but not often played engagement.  His most famous victory, it is hard to recreate as a wargame as it involves fog (thus hidden deployment) and really inept command on the part of his opposition.  (while not always a problem by many players, hard to force upon them). However I thought to complete, nonetheless, and play out myself as a play-test.

At first I employed a rather small ratio but soon found it too imposing so cut it down to about 1 element per ~ 2,000 (infantry). It is interesting to note the relatively few artillery and in this battle the Allies had twice the numbers as the French. In these rules, and as most analysts would suggest, artillery was the real killers of this era and as I found later in the game, this was certainly the case.


I completed the set up and allocated the appropriate command control and command morale chits to each commander.  Please note:  I used my 1815 Prussians primarily and some of the few Russians I have painted in lieu of the 1805 Russians and Austrians. The French are also incorrect but there you have it.  Also ignore any commander labels on the elements as these are not correct.  I kept each command as a different type so I could remember who was who.  Luckily I had enough on hand to make the numbers.
View from the south-east showing the Allies deployed on the Pratzen Heights.   The white cotton sheets indicate those French formations hidden under the fog.
In terms of numbers they were surprisingly even with the French having 29 elements of infantry, 7 of cavalry and 7 guns @ 12 points of fire.  The Allies have 30 elements of infantry, 7 of cavalry and 10 guns @ 24 points of fire.  Due to the apparent morale of each army I gave all the French infantry an extra morale/combat point. +25%. A large advantage.

While the battle occurred in the middle of winter on snowy ground with frozen ponds, pretend the green mat is white and the muddy ponds, frozen over.   Deployment was as historical as possible with some of the commands combined as they seemed to operated together or at least in the same direction.  Accounts certainly differ on which Generals are used to describe the action as apparently even the historical Allied commanders had some doubt on the command structure that day!  Similarly I combined some of the French commands but these were less of a problem to distinguish.  I will use the historical commanders and place names so those who are very familiar with Austerlitz can kinda follow the game progress.

The key to battle is the vast movement of the Allies south, off the Pratzen heights and the mass of the French coming out of the hiding fog to take the abandoned high ground cutting the Allied army in two and destroying the greater part of it.  Playing solo I ignored the deployed but "hidden" French (covered in some white cotton to remember...I still not sure how to do this with players....) and had the Allies march off the heights.  The French players in the scenario have from Turn 1 to Turn 5 (when the fog burns off) to start their advance.  Davout’s corps arrives Turn 3 to help Legrand fend off the Allies attack just as contact was being made.  As it were, some of the Allies started to blunder into Soult’s forces at the start of turn 5 in any event and so all the timing seemed to work out.
The Allies Columns advancing off the heights toward the south
and away from the French massed under the fog (white sheet)
the view from Napoleon's perspective

The game began as Doktorhov, Langeron, Prebyshevsky, with Lichtenstein and Milovodovich in support advanced upon their objective villages along the southern end of the Goldbach Stream.  These were defended by General Legrand with very few units but were eventually helped by Davout’s small force. When Soult’s and Oudinot’s grenadiers moved against Prebyshevsky’s small force, Milovodovich was still upon the heights and managed (with high dice thrown) to refocus his attack to a steady defensive posture on the hill ( note that only the Santon hill in the northern sector gave any defensive measure)  Meanwhile Lichtenstein’s cavalry seeing no movement opportunity behind Doktohov and Langeron, decided - as was he did historically - to move back north to meet the threat.  A long journey as it turned out.

In the northern sector, Bagration was doing well and had Lannes’ Corps fall back but which recovered (needing a roll of a 6 to do so! Lannes talent coming through? ) to support Bernadotte’s forces who had taken up the fight against Bagration for Santon hill and key to the French left flank.

Meanwhile back at the southern sector,  the Allies advance stalled and Doktohov’s forces needed to regroup falling back from the stream. (a rather unfortunate ‘Command Morale’ roll, of course) This was to the relief of both French Generals Davout and Legrand whose forces were seriously worn.



One of those lulls in the action now took place as both sides make the time to consolidate their positions or realign troops for coordinated moves ( i.e. group moves).  Milovodovich reinforced his defensive line as Prebyshevsky fell back.  Langeron held the village of Solokwitz which was his objective and seemed determined to stay, while Doktohov again moved to take the village of Telnitz and destroy Legrand’s French.

Meanwhile, the Russian Guard under Constantine finally advanced slowly as he struggled with his command (rolling 1’s each turn!) Bagration to his fore with his now exhausted command tried to work with Constantine to form a viable Allied flank under pressure from a much depleted Bernadotte and Lannes.

Murat now with maneuver room, charged against the square formations of Milovodovich’s right wing as Oudinot marched up and immediately threw himself at the Russian's center.  While these attacks were somewhat successful, Milovodovich’s command morale continued to be very strong despite heavy casualties ( his die rolls were always high! )
Oudinot's Grenadiers (my Young Guard types from the latter years of the wars) advancing past Napoleon.


Murat, after his impetus first charges having half his heavy cavalry unable to defeat the Russian squares and subsequently destroyed from Russian guns, became more circumspect and used his horse artillery to destroy the squares
Murat's horse guns firing to soften up the Allies squares. Yes, they CAN fire through
their own troops. A funny game incident occurred as each these guns fired twice (noted
as the two pips on the black dice) at each respective square.....
.....and can you guess which gun did more effect?  Yes, correct, upon the left one to my "death and destruction"
Landwehr unit!    [the cubes represent the element being in square formation] The element on the right was unscathed.
Unlike the historical events, Doktohov finally pushed away the thin French line in the south.  However Soult finally started to push his forces to the south in support but his poor command staff (it would appear from his continued low dice, and to be fair, disordering crossing of the stream) did not have him influence the affairs in the centre of the battle.

The French were losing steam.  Murat was down to half his cavalry strength and unable to make headway against the Russian squares and Lichtenstein’s cavalry and the Russian Guard heavy horse (my Prussian heavies actually) were now reinforcing the heights and meeting Murat's boys.
Heavy Cavalry vs Heavy Cavalry
{my Prussian Cuirassiers in campaign dress.  Old model Connoisseurs riders on Front Rank horses vs. Perry plastics}

 Lannes and Bernadotte were spent forces and only continued due to ceasing any self-destroying offensive actions. Oudinot’s grenadiers were making little impact and Davout and Legrand’s commands had ceased to exist. The only uncommitted force was Bessiere’s small Imperial Guard force ( this force would balloon later during Napoleon’s reign, but at this stage of history was very few).  Napoleon thought that if only one more Allied command could be broken, it would conclude the affair and he chose the weak Allied right flank under Bagration to attack.  The Chasseurs a Cheval of the Guard led the attack but quickly were dispersed by cannon fire.  The tight ranks of the blue-clad infantry followed only to meet the same fate.
Combined arms attack in action upon the French Guard who are loathed to form square as to give the artillery a better target, but if not, will be easy meat for the heavy cavalry.  

With the final French reserves gone, the fighting gradually petered out (as I designed the rules to do…) with the weakened elements unable to attack without themselves being eliminated from attrition and failing any commanded offensive actions.

The Allies with still a strong Guard force, plentiful artillery and Milovodovich’s remarkable defense of the heights had defied history and held the field in a hard fought affair.
----------------------------



Saturday, 17 March 2012

Battle of Small Big Antler Creek

"I want the hostiles dealt with one way or another!" ordered General Cloth to Lt. Col. Geo. A. Lemon of the 7th Kentucky Mounted Rifles.

The year is 1813 and while much of the American war effort was directed against the British, much was directed against the native population; notably against the Red Stick Creeks of modern-day Alabama and the tribes of the Northwest.  It is here that the battle occurs.

The charismatic and reckless Lemon gathered his command and divided it roughly into thirds with the other two commands under Major Marcus Vegas and Captain Frederick Lenteen.
Gen. Geo. A. Lemon ordering the advance (Old Glory American Command)

With the idea of compelling the "hostiles" to fight to avoid being trapped between two converging columns, Lemon led the attack with the right column.  The left under Vegas was to scout to the left trail and to bring up the wagons.

Vegas entered the small valley and immediately charged the native village but then immediately ordered a halt to dismount once some of the warriors started to fire from the edge of the village.  He did not press his advantage and it was thought that he was drunk.
Major Vegas' command (Old Glory Kentucky Mounted Riflemen) "Vegas" is part of the American High Command pack what could be holding a bottle but is a telescope.  Sometimes OG detail is a bit vague....
Indians poring out of the village with more warriors coming to support
my Native warriors (Old Glory woodland pack of the FWI)

Now warriors pored out of the village to confront him and Vegas ordered a retreat to a nearby woods. He led the 'withdrawl' during which the mounted rifles became hopelessly unhinged by contradictory mount/dismount orders and their commander's breakdown.  However the natives have mostly left him to go after Lemon who was apparently attacking the middle of the village and Vegas, now joined by Lenteen were content to sit on a hill to defend again the few Indians which confronted them.  They did indeed hear the gunfire in the distance but, for many hours, did not make a move to join Lemon. Both did not like Lemon but also could not image Lemon being defeated and felt they could not compromise their position to help. Many a battle was affected by such attitudes.
the rout back into the woods

Shortly after hearing the quieting of the firing to their north that the Natives came in force to 'lay siege' to the remaining 7th Kentucky on their hill.  For two days the Natives sniped at the dismounted riflemen until the Natives departed having known the US regulars would arrive shortly.......

Epilogue
Obviously this was a reenactment of the Battle of the Little Big Horn (I was going to call it "Small Tuba River" but that may have given it away! <g>)
Cloth=Terry, Lemon=Custer, Vegas=Reno, Lenteen=Benteen.  1813=1878.  Other than that pretty well as it went.

The scenario was prompted from the listening to while painting, the excellent book on the topic "The Last Stand" by Nathaniel Philbrick .  Very even but critical account of the actions of all the participants both American and Native; and gives you the reasons for the demise of the native way of life in that very short amount of time.  The scenario is still very plausible is 1813 as it was in 1878.  It was America vs the Indians for two hundred years.

Friday, 3 February 2012

The Poor Cousin: the War of 1812

Preface
I went over to Barry's place yesterday and enjoyed his "museum". He is the "ultimate wargamer" of the region.  His gaming room has a 6" by 18" (?) (Very BIG anyway) table - currently completely covered in figures needing basing.  He has a very large militaria collection of actual and recreated helmets, shakos, weapons, flags etc. I mean who else would have a panzerfaust leaning against the wall and an authentic Russian cuirassier helmet c1808 nearby?! It is extremely fun to fondle such items.



Now the point!
He also has an extensive wargame/military library from which I borrowed several uniform reference books which I have yet to see.  I picked these particular books as I am currently on this War of 1812 kick and thought these books would add to my knowledge base.  Apparently I was mistaken. 

The first books were part of the famous Funcken series.  These were the originals written in French "L'UNIFORME ET LES ARMES DES SOLDATS DES ETATS-UNIS"  I suppose I should not have been shocked at the only brief examination of the uniforms for the War of 1812 as it is not mentioned in the sub-title (in English: the Wars of Independence, Succession, of Mexico and in the Far-West). Yup, no mention of poor old 1812.  While plate after color plate shows for example the dress outfits of the cavalry c1880, only one poor plate shows only a few examples from the war and three are of the same artillery outfit.  Argh.  Very little space is committed to the descriptions.  So any purchasers out there are duly warned.

I also borrowed The West Point Military History Series on the" Early American Wars and Military Institutions".   This series is noted for its large maps.  This book is 76 pages of text but only has less than 5 devoted to the entire history of this long war. Of the maps only four are of the conflict, the first three covering the first three years of the war showing the eastern part of North America and the major offensive thrusts as only small arrows. Only the Battle of New Orleans gets a full page (the only battle the Americans can rightly claim as victors. coincidence? I think not) Oh, by the way, the map is not worth the effort, I have seen maps on the internet just as useful.

Yes, I stayed up late, prepared my hot-toddy, and was disappointed.
The War of 1812 is the poor cousin to all the other, "more glorious" wars Americans have engaged in, it would seem. (grin)

Saturday, 7 January 2012

War of 1812 "Guide Books" review


War of 1812 Guide Books review
I purchased these War of 1812 Wargamer Guide books from On Military Matters recently. They are published by them (c.1997) ISBN 1-900688-30-1

Two books in the series : The King's Army by Charles Glenn and Stephen Manley; and The American Army by Richard V. Barbuto.

Both are about 30 pages long, printed in an old photocopy style. I did not get much additional information from these than what I have achieved from other sources (notably from Chartrand's excellent book on the American forces recently republished and amended with some new color plates)
The British army is that of the Napoleonic wars with the same uniforms and regulations (with only some special units which were local or brought in only for the American campaign (the West Indies regiments at New Orleans, for example) So if you study the British and have the Osprey books on the topic or access the Company of Military Historians, you pretty well have all the necessary information to have it correct. 


I noticed some notes on several units which I found interesting or did not know of, but would like to confirm with other sources. But with the vulgarities of supply during that era, the collector has much “wiggle room” to justify use of older uniforms, unique costumes or mixture thereof. The authors also seem to use this concept in many of their assumptions. True enough.

At $12 per (with shipping extra) I don't know if they are good value. Good to have on the shelve perhaps; if you loan it out it is not invaluable, however. Found it interesting that each book would have a full page index for only <30 pages!

If you need any specific unit uniform information please feel free to contact me.