This page contains online supplementary information for the paper "Meaning Variation and Data Quality in the Corpus of Founding Era American English", published at ACL 2025. (See below for a full citation). There paper is available
here.
Legal scholars are increasingly using corpus based methods for assessing historical meaning. Among work focused on the so-called founding era (mid to late 18th century), the majority of such studies use the
Corpus of Founding Era American English (COFEA) and rely on methods such as word counting and manual coding. Here, we demonstrate what can be inferred about meaning change and variation using more advanced NLP methods, focusing on terms in the U.S. Constitution. We also carry out a data quality assessment of COFEA, pointing out issues with OCR quality and metadata, compare diachronic change to synchronic variation, and discuss limitations when using NLP methods for studying historical meaning.
Interactive versions of all figures from the paper are included below, enabling additional exploration of this data.