
Baukje Miedema
Related Authors
Joachim Sturmberg
Monash University
Marc Champagne
Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Andrew Grandinetti
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Wendy Grube
University of Pennsylvania
Wenyi Chen
ESC RENNES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
Jane Mills
La Trobe University
Carlos Serra
Universidade Eduardo Mondlane
Isabelle Ellis
University of Tasmania
Izet Masic, MD, PhD, FWAAS, FEASA, FIAHSI, FEFMI, FACMI
University of Sarajevo
Garumma T Feyissa
Drexel University
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Baukje Miedema
Methods: A longitudinal national study employing clinical assessments and survey methods followed 178 women over 43 months (3.6 years) to assess issues related to arm morbidity post-breast cancer surgery. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify which variables were predictive of recreational difficulties experienced by women 8 and 43 months post-breast cancer surgery.
Results: Between 8 months (T1) and 43 months (T2) post-breast cancer surgery, women demonstrated slight increases in lymphedema. Conversely, a significant decrease was observed in the number of ROM restrictions and pain when using the arm. Despite the overall improvements in arm morbidity, some women continued to report moderate pain and ROM restrictions. The two arm morbidity factors were found to be statistically significant (p<0.001) predictors of recreational difficulties at both 8 and 43 months post-surgery, with pain accounting for the greatest proportion of variance.
Discussion/conclusion: Pain and ROM restrictions were the only significant predictors of recreational difficulties during the first 3.6 years after breast cancer surgery. Specifically, women who still experience pain years after breast cancer surgery report difficulties in their recreational pursuits.
Implications for cancer survivors: Pain and ROM restrictions may prohibit participation in recreational activity and targeted intervention should be sought.
Methods: We completed 40 qualitative interviews as one component of a multidisciplinary national longitudinal study of arm morbidity after breast cancer (n=745) involving four research sites (Fredericton/Saint John, Montreal, Winnipeg, Surrey). During semi-structured interviews, participants who had reported arm morbidity and disability in earlier surveys were asked to discuss the effects of these conditions on everyday life.
Results: The interviewees reported making major adjustments to paid and unpaid work, which often involved the assistance of family members, thus demonstrating the effect of disability. Interview data resulted in the creation of a model that addresses arm morbidity and disability, and that holds implication for health care professionals.
Conclusions: Based on the interview findings, we conclude that a robust measure of disability after breast cancer should be developed. In the absence of a validated measure of the effect of disability, evaluating qualitative responses to questions about everyday activities could provide the impetus for provision of physical therapy and emotional support.
Methods: A longitudinal national study employing clinical assessments and survey methods followed 178 women over 43 months (3.6 years) to assess issues related to arm morbidity post-breast cancer surgery. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify which variables were predictive of recreational difficulties experienced by women 8 and 43 months post-breast cancer surgery.
Results: Between 8 months (T1) and 43 months (T2) post-breast cancer surgery, women demonstrated slight increases in lymphedema. Conversely, a significant decrease was observed in the number of ROM restrictions and pain when using the arm. Despite the overall improvements in arm morbidity, some women continued to report moderate pain and ROM restrictions. The two arm morbidity factors were found to be statistically significant (p<0.001) predictors of recreational difficulties at both 8 and 43 months post-surgery, with pain accounting for the greatest proportion of variance.
Discussion/conclusion: Pain and ROM restrictions were the only significant predictors of recreational difficulties during the first 3.6 years after breast cancer surgery. Specifically, women who still experience pain years after breast cancer surgery report difficulties in their recreational pursuits.
Implications for cancer survivors: Pain and ROM restrictions may prohibit participation in recreational activity and targeted intervention should be sought.
Methods: We completed 40 qualitative interviews as one component of a multidisciplinary national longitudinal study of arm morbidity after breast cancer (n=745) involving four research sites (Fredericton/Saint John, Montreal, Winnipeg, Surrey). During semi-structured interviews, participants who had reported arm morbidity and disability in earlier surveys were asked to discuss the effects of these conditions on everyday life.
Results: The interviewees reported making major adjustments to paid and unpaid work, which often involved the assistance of family members, thus demonstrating the effect of disability. Interview data resulted in the creation of a model that addresses arm morbidity and disability, and that holds implication for health care professionals.
Conclusions: Based on the interview findings, we conclude that a robust measure of disability after breast cancer should be developed. In the absence of a validated measure of the effect of disability, evaluating qualitative responses to questions about everyday activities could provide the impetus for provision of physical therapy and emotional support.