Dr. Juan Jose Rodriguez, M.A., PhD
Welcome to by Academia Edu Profile! Bienvenidos a mi perfil en Academia Edu! Please check out my latest publication in Taylor & Francis, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21692327.2023.2188243?src=
I could not update my profile before because I was busy actually writing the papers. BA and MA in Philosophy with specialisation in modern philosophy, metaphysics, classical German philosophy and practical philosophy of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries at the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Master Erasmus Mundus Europhilosophy from the Universities of Toulouse II, Bergische Universität Wuppertal and Karlova Univerzitá.
My work focuses on Schelling's middle metaphysics, the aesthetic idealism of Kant, Schelling and Nietzsche, and the ethical and political consequences of the dispute between Schelling and Hegel over the concepts of freedom and system.
In my doctoral thesis, both in Prague and in Wuppertal, I examined some of these points in Schelling's philosophy between the years 1804 and 1811/1815.
Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Karel Novotny (Prague) and Prof. Dr. Alexander Schnell (Wuppertal)
Address: Krásova 1013/6, 130 00, Prague, Czech Republic
I could not update my profile before because I was busy actually writing the papers. BA and MA in Philosophy with specialisation in modern philosophy, metaphysics, classical German philosophy and practical philosophy of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries at the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Master Erasmus Mundus Europhilosophy from the Universities of Toulouse II, Bergische Universität Wuppertal and Karlova Univerzitá.
My work focuses on Schelling's middle metaphysics, the aesthetic idealism of Kant, Schelling and Nietzsche, and the ethical and political consequences of the dispute between Schelling and Hegel over the concepts of freedom and system.
In my doctoral thesis, both in Prague and in Wuppertal, I examined some of these points in Schelling's philosophy between the years 1804 and 1811/1815.
Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Karel Novotny (Prague) and Prof. Dr. Alexander Schnell (Wuppertal)
Address: Krásova 1013/6, 130 00, Prague, Czech Republic
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (26)
Uploads
Papers by Dr. Juan Jose Rodriguez, M.A., PhD
the theory of nature as life, becoming, and productivity (3). Heidegger’s thought regarding Schelling’s concept of freedom is mobilized in the following points (2). The first concerns the determination of freedom in general through the «essence» of human freedom. Both authors establish,
secondly, the paradoxical character of human freedom as ideal indeterminacy, and, at the same time, as an «alwaysalready- decided» being. The division of the «essence» of every being between ground and existence is already a famous locus of coincidence between Schelling’s and Heidegger’s ontological thought. The way in which this division is articulated regarding the concept of temporal determination will be the subject of our analysis in sections 2 and 4.
Schelling, en la Freiheitsschrift, a una noción de inmanencia vinculada
a la tradición spinozista. Para lograr tal objetivo, (1) tematizo, en primer
lugar, el marco teórico en que se inserta la discusión schellinguiana sobre el spinozismo y el panteísmo hacia fines del siglo XVIII. Se trata del
idealismo de Kant y Fichte, aunque grandemente modificado. En segundo lugar, (2) emprendo una reconstrucción de la argumentación interna
al escrito de 1809, prestando especial atención a la tercera crítica de la
noción de inmanencia tal como tiene lugar con el tratamiento del mal.
25
Finalmente, aunque de modo más reducido, (3) presento lo que podríamos considerar una reversión de la crítica de antropomorfismo formulada a Schelling. Al final del trabajo, espero haber puesto de manifiesto
que, en diversos puntos, el planteo de Schelling de 1809 flirtea con una
crítica de la inmanencia, aunque sin desarrollarla acabadamente, y, en
consecuencia, trasunta nuevas formas de dualismo y trascendencia, pero
que no deben ser interpretadas bajo su tradicional cariz negativo.
Drafts by Dr. Juan Jose Rodriguez, M.A., PhD
To reveal the similarities between the position of Nietzsche and that of the romantics, as well as with Kant and Schopenhauer, is also a secondary objective of ours. Our broader objective in this as in other works to come is to defend a metaphysical position that gives greater prominence and centrality to dualism, and therefore to reject the monism that is traditionally associated with the philosophies of Spinoza and Hegel. To achieve this end, it is essential to draw the line that goes from Kant to Nietzsche, passing through Schelling and Schopenhauer, and that we investigate here in two of its main authors.
Books by Dr. Juan Jose Rodriguez, M.A., PhD
the theory of nature as life, becoming, and productivity (3). Heidegger’s thought regarding Schelling’s concept of freedom is mobilized in the following points (2). The first concerns the determination of freedom in general through the «essence» of human freedom. Both authors establish,
secondly, the paradoxical character of human freedom as ideal indeterminacy, and, at the same time, as an «alwaysalready- decided» being. The division of the «essence» of every being between ground and existence is already a famous locus of coincidence between Schelling’s and Heidegger’s ontological thought. The way in which this division is articulated regarding the concept of temporal determination will be the subject of our analysis in sections 2 and 4.
Schelling, en la Freiheitsschrift, a una noción de inmanencia vinculada
a la tradición spinozista. Para lograr tal objetivo, (1) tematizo, en primer
lugar, el marco teórico en que se inserta la discusión schellinguiana sobre el spinozismo y el panteísmo hacia fines del siglo XVIII. Se trata del
idealismo de Kant y Fichte, aunque grandemente modificado. En segundo lugar, (2) emprendo una reconstrucción de la argumentación interna
al escrito de 1809, prestando especial atención a la tercera crítica de la
noción de inmanencia tal como tiene lugar con el tratamiento del mal.
25
Finalmente, aunque de modo más reducido, (3) presento lo que podríamos considerar una reversión de la crítica de antropomorfismo formulada a Schelling. Al final del trabajo, espero haber puesto de manifiesto
que, en diversos puntos, el planteo de Schelling de 1809 flirtea con una
crítica de la inmanencia, aunque sin desarrollarla acabadamente, y, en
consecuencia, trasunta nuevas formas de dualismo y trascendencia, pero
que no deben ser interpretadas bajo su tradicional cariz negativo.
To reveal the similarities between the position of Nietzsche and that of the romantics, as well as with Kant and Schopenhauer, is also a secondary objective of ours. Our broader objective in this as in other works to come is to defend a metaphysical position that gives greater prominence and centrality to dualism, and therefore to reject the monism that is traditionally associated with the philosophies of Spinoza and Hegel. To achieve this end, it is essential to draw the line that goes from Kant to Nietzsche, passing through Schelling and Schopenhauer, and that we investigate here in two of its main authors.