
İlkay Aklan
Address: Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi
Arkeoloji Bölümü
Arkeoloji Bölümü
less
Related Authors
Atakan Akçay
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University
S. Yücel ŞENYURT
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University
Seda Kara
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University
Mehmet CEVHER
Cukurova University
Semih Yaşar Çizikci
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University
Mehmet Ali Özdemir
Ataturk University
Mehmet Işıklı
Atatürk Universty
Umut Kıvrak
Karadeniz Technical University
ERTUĞ ERGÜRER
Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University
InterestsView All (8)
Uploads
Papers by İlkay Aklan
strategic location in the center of Anatolia, has hosted a lot of cultures throughout historyand this area of high plateaus formed the core region of the Hittite State since the Late Bronze Age. The Hittite state, which had achieved political unification of a large part of Anatolia from the 17th century BC onward, lost power in the process, called the “crisis years” between the late 13th century and early 12th century BC in the Eastern
Mediterranean Basin; this process culminated in the withdrawal of the Hittite state from the historical arena, thus initiating a new but unstable period for the lands in question. The Early Iron Age, the beginning of this period that is called the Dark Age due to the lack of written sources, is represented by a process in which material culture changed, by migrations and by rural communities living in a dispersed way. The Middle and Late Iron Age, in which figures of power were seen and political actors increased in the Central Anatolian Region after a long time, witnessed the struggles of powers such as Phrygian, Tabal, Assyrian and Urartian first, and then Lydia, Medes and Persians. This contest for domination effort determined the historical process of the region. In this study, the process
from the end of the Late Bronze Age to the end of the Iron Age in Central Anatolia is examined in the light of written sources and archaeological evidence, and the study is intended to make a general assessment on the process undergone by the region.
Settlement Area”, consists of Topakhöyük and the Terrace Area to the west, and Yassıhöyük in the east, which is 350 m away from these units. While the excavations carried out between 2007 and 2021 in Ovaören proved that these three units are chronologically complementary areas, Early and Middle Bronze Age layers in Topakhöyük and the Terrace Area; Late Bronze Age layers, Iron Age layers, and weakly structured Hellenistic-Roman layers were unearthed as to in Yassıhöyük. Ovaören is one of the
settlements affected by the political and cultural changes in the region in the Early Iron Age, and which
grew and developed within the boundaries of Tabal Country in the Middle Iron Age. Ovaören, which was considered one of the important centers of the Tabal country in the Late Hittite period, developed into a city within the borders of the satrapy of Cappadocia in the Late Iron Age. In this context,
architectural remains and archaeological finds from the Iron Age layers in the settlement contribute to understanding the Iron Age culture of the region. Iron Age layers covering this development and alteration process in Ovaören are represented by YH 8-7 dated to the Early Iron Age, YH 6-4 dated to the Middle Iron Age, and YH 3-2 dated to the Late Iron Age in Yassıhöyük.
district of Adana province and 5 km north of Mustafabeyli town of the district. Especially, the settlement,
which reflects the rich culture of the 2nd millennium BC and with its monumental architectural elements,
lost its wealth during the Hellenistic Period and became a provincial settlement. The finds uncovered in
the Hellenistic Period layer with two architectural phases (TH. IIa-IIb) in the mound, together with the
hearths and platforms found on the edges of the quarries and the walls, indicate the workshop function of
these structures. While the pyramidal, conical and discoid shaped weights and spindle whorls, as well as
bone tools, obtained from these spaces, proves the textile production in Tatarlı Höyük; production-oriented
function. The millstones, which are the subject of this article and which are associated with cereal activities,
were also found in different areas of the settlement. layer (TH. II a-b). The 7 Olynthus mills, 3 of which were
uncovered in Tatarli during the years 2011-2018, belong to the I₁ group according to R. Frankel’s classification,
Phase II (TH. IIa). According to the data obtained from the excavations in 2007, the Hellenistic Period was
dated between the 3rd and 1st centuries BC; ceramics constitute the Hellenistic ceramic repertoire of the
settlement. Based on these data, it is assumed that the early phase of the Hellenistic Period (TH. IIb) started
in the 3rd century BC. At the end of the 2nd century BC, which was the end of the IIb phase, the settlement
began to shrink and the architectural orientation changed during the IIa phase, resulting in simpler and
sloppy structures. With this period, a large number of loom weights and spindle whorls recovered in phase
IIa structures and workshops led to the assumption that towards the end of the period, Tatarlı Höyük turned
to an economy based entirely on textile production. In parallel with this idea, the transformation of the
settlement to a textile-based subsistence economy, which has diminished the grain-producing character,
should have rendered the Olynthus mills which have standardized the grain production jobs dysfunctional.
Papers II by İlkay Aklan
strategic location in the center of Anatolia, has hosted a lot of cultures throughout historyand this area of high plateaus formed the core region of the Hittite State since the Late Bronze Age. The Hittite state, which had achieved political unification of a large part of Anatolia from the 17th century BC onward, lost power in the process, called the “crisis years” between the late 13th century and early 12th century BC in the Eastern
Mediterranean Basin; this process culminated in the withdrawal of the Hittite state from the historical arena, thus initiating a new but unstable period for the lands in question. The Early Iron Age, the beginning of this period that is called the Dark Age due to the lack of written sources, is represented by a process in which material culture changed, by migrations and by rural communities living in a dispersed way. The Middle and Late Iron Age, in which figures of power were seen and political actors increased in the Central Anatolian Region after a long time, witnessed the struggles of powers such as Phrygian, Tabal, Assyrian and Urartian first, and then Lydia, Medes and Persians. This contest for domination effort determined the historical process of the region. In this study, the process
from the end of the Late Bronze Age to the end of the Iron Age in Central Anatolia is examined in the light of written sources and archaeological evidence, and the study is intended to make a general assessment on the process undergone by the region.
Settlement Area”, consists of Topakhöyük and the Terrace Area to the west, and Yassıhöyük in the east, which is 350 m away from these units. While the excavations carried out between 2007 and 2021 in Ovaören proved that these three units are chronologically complementary areas, Early and Middle Bronze Age layers in Topakhöyük and the Terrace Area; Late Bronze Age layers, Iron Age layers, and weakly structured Hellenistic-Roman layers were unearthed as to in Yassıhöyük. Ovaören is one of the
settlements affected by the political and cultural changes in the region in the Early Iron Age, and which
grew and developed within the boundaries of Tabal Country in the Middle Iron Age. Ovaören, which was considered one of the important centers of the Tabal country in the Late Hittite period, developed into a city within the borders of the satrapy of Cappadocia in the Late Iron Age. In this context,
architectural remains and archaeological finds from the Iron Age layers in the settlement contribute to understanding the Iron Age culture of the region. Iron Age layers covering this development and alteration process in Ovaören are represented by YH 8-7 dated to the Early Iron Age, YH 6-4 dated to the Middle Iron Age, and YH 3-2 dated to the Late Iron Age in Yassıhöyük.
district of Adana province and 5 km north of Mustafabeyli town of the district. Especially, the settlement,
which reflects the rich culture of the 2nd millennium BC and with its monumental architectural elements,
lost its wealth during the Hellenistic Period and became a provincial settlement. The finds uncovered in
the Hellenistic Period layer with two architectural phases (TH. IIa-IIb) in the mound, together with the
hearths and platforms found on the edges of the quarries and the walls, indicate the workshop function of
these structures. While the pyramidal, conical and discoid shaped weights and spindle whorls, as well as
bone tools, obtained from these spaces, proves the textile production in Tatarlı Höyük; production-oriented
function. The millstones, which are the subject of this article and which are associated with cereal activities,
were also found in different areas of the settlement. layer (TH. II a-b). The 7 Olynthus mills, 3 of which were
uncovered in Tatarli during the years 2011-2018, belong to the I₁ group according to R. Frankel’s classification,
Phase II (TH. IIa). According to the data obtained from the excavations in 2007, the Hellenistic Period was
dated between the 3rd and 1st centuries BC; ceramics constitute the Hellenistic ceramic repertoire of the
settlement. Based on these data, it is assumed that the early phase of the Hellenistic Period (TH. IIb) started
in the 3rd century BC. At the end of the 2nd century BC, which was the end of the IIb phase, the settlement
began to shrink and the architectural orientation changed during the IIa phase, resulting in simpler and
sloppy structures. With this period, a large number of loom weights and spindle whorls recovered in phase
IIa structures and workshops led to the assumption that towards the end of the period, Tatarlı Höyük turned
to an economy based entirely on textile production. In parallel with this idea, the transformation of the
settlement to a textile-based subsistence economy, which has diminished the grain-producing character,
should have rendered the Olynthus mills which have standardized the grain production jobs dysfunctional.