Papers by Benjamin Judkins
This paper begins with an examination of two historic accounts of “challenge fights” within the t... more This paper begins with an examination of two historic accounts of “challenge fights” within the traditional Chinese martial arts. While these documents are concerned with many of the same basic themes, they paint very different pictures of the hand combat community during the Late Imperial and Republican periods. They are also representative of the types of puzzles that scholars are faced with when attempting to investigate the development and social setting of these fighting systems. Given such difficulties, why should scholars care about the social history of the Chinese martial arts? Likewise, what can such studies offer practitioners of the Asian martial arts today? This keynote addresses each of these questions with reference to my recent volume, co-authored with Jon Nielson, The Creation of Wing Chun: A Social History of the Southern Chinese Martial Arts (SUNY Press, 2015).

Drawing on an ethnographic investigation of a community dedicated to the hyper-real practice of l... more Drawing on an ethnographic investigation of a community dedicated to the hyper-real practice of lightsaber combat, as well as the historically grounded traditional Chinese martial art known as wing chun, the follow paper seeks to explore the various ways in which martial arts create meaning and do social work in the modern world. It begins by asking what type of " martial art " lightsaber combat is, and why individuals might choose to practice it given the many other combat traditions that already exist. To resolve these issues we consider some of the ways that martial arts practice can function as a modern ritual system. A theoretical framework advanced by the well-known American anthropologist Victor Turner is then employed to suggest avenues for understanding why certain individuals might be drawn towards historical (and often liminal) or hyper-real (typically liminoid) practices. This, in turn, offers a new perspective on the wide variety of social functions that the martial arts are expected to perform.

Martial arts studies has entered a period of rapid conceptual
development. Yet relatively few w... more Martial arts studies has entered a period of rapid conceptual
development. Yet relatively few works have attempted to define
the ‘martial arts’, our signature concept. This article evaluates
a number of approaches to the problem by asking whether
‘lightsaber combat’ is a martial art. Inspired by a successful film
franchise, these increasingly popular practices combine elements
of historical swordsmanship, modern combat sports, stage
choreography and a fictional worldview to ‘recreate’ the fighting
methods of Jedi and Sith warriors. The rise of such hyper-
real fighting systems may force us to reconsider a number of
questions. What is the link between ‘authentic’ martial arts and
history? Can an activity be a martial art even if its students and
teachers do not claim it as such? Is our current body of theory
capable of exploring the rise of hyper-real practices? Most
importantly, what sort of theoretical work do we expect from
our definition of the ‘martial arts’?

Xilam is a modern Mexican martial art that is inspired by pre-Hispanic warrior cultures of ancien... more Xilam is a modern Mexican martial art that is inspired by pre-Hispanic warrior cultures of ancient Mesoamerica, namely the Aztecs (Mexica), Maya and Zapotec cultures. It provides a noteworthy case study of a Latin American fighting system that has been recently invented, but aspires to rescue, rediscover and relive the warrior philosophies that existed before the Spanish Conquest and subsequent movements beginning in 1521. Using the thought-provoking work of anthropologist Guillermo Bonfil Batalla, México Profundo, I aim to analyse the Xilam Martial Arts Association through the way that they represent themselves in their three main media outlets: The official webpage, the Facebook group and the YouTube channel. I argue that their portrayal of the art as a form of Mesoamerican culture and wisdom for current and future generations of Mexicans is contrasted to contemporary Mexico, a Western (Occidental) project that is far removed from the foundations of this diverse country. Overall, the data suggests that certain elements of Mesoamerican civilisation may be transmitted to young Mexicans through a mind-body discipline, which in turn acts as a form of physical (re)education. Overall, xilam is both an invented tradition (in a technical sense) and a reinvented tradition (in a cultural sense) that provides lessons on the timeless issues of transformation, transmission and transcendence.
Keywords: Mexico Profundo; Mesoamerica; pre-Hispanic; martial arts cultures; warrior philosophies.

International Studies Quarterly, 2004
Is there a noticeable difference among political parties in a country in their trade policy posit... more Is there a noticeable difference among political parties in a country in their trade policy positions? Do left parties advocate different trade policies than right parties? In the advanced industrial countries where labor tends to be scarce, are left parties more protectionist than right ones, which represent capital owners? Political institutions within these democratic countries may affect the role of partisanship. We also investigate whether increasing globalization has led to more or less partisan polarization over trade policy. We examine 25 developed countries from 1945-98 to see how their parties have competed over trade policy. Controlling for various factors, partisanship matters. In terms of position taking, right parties consistently take more free trade stances than do left ones. Globalization and other international forces have also shaped both the nature and the extent of the debate domestically over exposure to international trade.

Is there a noticeable difference among political parties in a country in their trade policy posit... more Is there a noticeable difference among political parties in a country in their trade policy positions? Do left parties advocate different trade policies than right parties? In the advanced industrial countries where labor tends to be scarce, are left parties more protectionist than right ones, which represent capital owners? Political institutions within these democratic countries may affect the role of partisanship. We also investigate whether increasing globalization has led to more or less partisan polarization over trade policy. We examine 25 developed countries from 1945-98 to see how their parties have competed over trade policy. Controlling for various factors, partisanship matters. In terms of position taking, right parties consistently take more free trade stances than do left ones. Globalization and other international forces have also shaped both the nature and the extent of the debate domestically over exposure to international trade.

‘Kung fu’ has become synonymous with the traditional Chinese martial arts in the popular imaginat... more ‘Kung fu’ has become synonymous with the traditional Chinese martial arts in the popular imagination. Yet some practitioners and writers object to this usage, insisting instead on the adoption of other labels such as ‘wushu.’ Increasingly authors in both the academic and more serious popular literatures are moving away from ‘kung fu’ as it is perceived as both inauthentic and ahistorical. But is this really the case? The following article examines the use of ‘kung fu’ in both the Chinese and English language literatures on the martial arts from the middle of the 19th century to the 1960s. It finds that the term’s adoption as a descriptor of a set of martial practices is older than is generally acknowledged. There are also specific regional and social reasons why certain Chinese martial artists have chosen to adopt and promote this term in describing their own practice. Like the traditional Chinese martial arts themselves, the term kung fu has meant many things to various practitioners in different times and places. By studying the evolution and spread of this terminology, students of martial studies can gain insight into the changing nature of the Chinese martial arts.
Errata: The reference to James Lee on page 17 should read "James Wing Woo."
Books by Benjamin Judkins
Martial Arts Studies, issue two - Spring 2016

Martial Arts Studies
Autumn 2015
Issue 1
Table of Contents
Editorial
• Paul Bowman and Benjami... more Martial Arts Studies
Autumn 2015
Issue 1
Table of Contents
Editorial
• Paul Bowman and Benjamin N. Judkins
Articles
• Paul Bowman, Asking the Question: Is Martial Arts Studies an Academic Field?
• Sixt Wetzler, Martial arts studies as Kulturwissenschaft: A possible theoretical framework
• D. S. Farrer, Efficacy and Entertainment in Martial Arts Studies: Anthropological Perspectives
• Jared Miracle, Imposing the Terms of the Battle: Donn F. Draeger, Count Dante, and the Struggle for American Martial Arts Identity
• Alexander Hay, The Art and Politics of Fence: Subtexts and Ideologies of Late 16th Century Fencing Manuals
Review Article
• Kyle Barrowman, History in the Making: Martial Arts between Planet Hollywood and Planet Hong Kong
Book Reviews
• The Creation of Wing Chun: A Social History of the Southern Chinese Martial Arts. 2015. Benjamin Judkins and Jon Nielson. State University of New York Press. 364 Pages. $90/£59.29. Reviewed by Douglas Wile
• Jet Li: Chinese Masculinity and Transnational Film Stardom. 2015. Sabrina Yu. Edinburgh University Press. 224 Pages. $34.95/£19.99. Reviewed by Wayne Wong
• Demonic Warfare: Daoism, Territorial Networks, and the History of a Ming Novel. 2015. Mark R. E. Meulenbeld. University of Hawai’i Press. 288 Pages. $57/£36.43. Reviewed by Scott P. Phillips
• Martial Arts Studies: Disrupting Disciplinary Boundaries. 2015. Paul Bowman. Rowman & Littlefield International. 208 Pages. $32.95/£22.95. Reviewed by Adam Frank

This book explores the social history of southern Chinese martial arts and their contemporary imp... more This book explores the social history of southern Chinese martial arts and their contemporary importance to local identity and narratives of resistance. Hong Kong’s Bruce Lee ushered the Chinese martial arts onto an international stage in the 1970s. Lee’s teacher, Ip Man, master of Wing Chun Kung Fu, has recently emerged as a highly visible symbol of southern Chinese identity and pride. Benjamin N. Judkins and Jon Nielson examine the emergence of Wing Chun to reveal how this body of social practices developed and why individuals continue to turn to the martial arts as they navigate the challenges of a rapidly evolving environment. After surveying the development of hand combat traditions in Guangdong Province from roughly the start of the nineteenth century until 1949, the authors turn to Wing Chun, noting its development, the changing social attitudes towards this practice over time, and its ultimate emergence as a global art form.
Benjamin N. Judkins holds a doctoral degree in political science from Columbia University. Jon Nielson is chief instructor at Wing Chun Hall in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Conference Presentations by Benjamin Judkins
This is a recording of the keynote address that I delivered at the 2015 Martial Arts Studies held... more This is a recording of the keynote address that I delivered at the 2015 Martial Arts Studies held at the University of Cardiff. Click the link to see more.
Interviews by Benjamin Judkins
Inquiring Jedis want to know
Chinese martial arts—popular among Americans and prized for their ancient roots— owe much to mode... more Chinese martial arts—popular among Americans and prized for their ancient roots— owe much to modern conflicts in China, says Ben Judkins ’98. Interview by Karen McCally ’02 (PhD) for the Rochester Review.
Book Reviews by Benjamin Judkins
A review of Jonathan Gottschall's "The Professor in the Cage: Why Men Fight, and Why we Like to W... more A review of Jonathan Gottschall's "The Professor in the Cage: Why Men Fight, and Why we Like to Watch" (Penguin, 2015).
Reviews of D. S. Farrer by Benjamin Judkins
Uploads
Papers by Benjamin Judkins
development. Yet relatively few works have attempted to define
the ‘martial arts’, our signature concept. This article evaluates
a number of approaches to the problem by asking whether
‘lightsaber combat’ is a martial art. Inspired by a successful film
franchise, these increasingly popular practices combine elements
of historical swordsmanship, modern combat sports, stage
choreography and a fictional worldview to ‘recreate’ the fighting
methods of Jedi and Sith warriors. The rise of such hyper-
real fighting systems may force us to reconsider a number of
questions. What is the link between ‘authentic’ martial arts and
history? Can an activity be a martial art even if its students and
teachers do not claim it as such? Is our current body of theory
capable of exploring the rise of hyper-real practices? Most
importantly, what sort of theoretical work do we expect from
our definition of the ‘martial arts’?
Keywords: Mexico Profundo; Mesoamerica; pre-Hispanic; martial arts cultures; warrior philosophies.
Errata: The reference to James Lee on page 17 should read "James Wing Woo."
Books by Benjamin Judkins
Autumn 2015
Issue 1
Table of Contents
Editorial
• Paul Bowman and Benjamin N. Judkins
Articles
• Paul Bowman, Asking the Question: Is Martial Arts Studies an Academic Field?
• Sixt Wetzler, Martial arts studies as Kulturwissenschaft: A possible theoretical framework
• D. S. Farrer, Efficacy and Entertainment in Martial Arts Studies: Anthropological Perspectives
• Jared Miracle, Imposing the Terms of the Battle: Donn F. Draeger, Count Dante, and the Struggle for American Martial Arts Identity
• Alexander Hay, The Art and Politics of Fence: Subtexts and Ideologies of Late 16th Century Fencing Manuals
Review Article
• Kyle Barrowman, History in the Making: Martial Arts between Planet Hollywood and Planet Hong Kong
Book Reviews
• The Creation of Wing Chun: A Social History of the Southern Chinese Martial Arts. 2015. Benjamin Judkins and Jon Nielson. State University of New York Press. 364 Pages. $90/£59.29. Reviewed by Douglas Wile
• Jet Li: Chinese Masculinity and Transnational Film Stardom. 2015. Sabrina Yu. Edinburgh University Press. 224 Pages. $34.95/£19.99. Reviewed by Wayne Wong
• Demonic Warfare: Daoism, Territorial Networks, and the History of a Ming Novel. 2015. Mark R. E. Meulenbeld. University of Hawai’i Press. 288 Pages. $57/£36.43. Reviewed by Scott P. Phillips
• Martial Arts Studies: Disrupting Disciplinary Boundaries. 2015. Paul Bowman. Rowman & Littlefield International. 208 Pages. $32.95/£22.95. Reviewed by Adam Frank
Benjamin N. Judkins holds a doctoral degree in political science from Columbia University. Jon Nielson is chief instructor at Wing Chun Hall in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Conference Presentations by Benjamin Judkins
Interviews by Benjamin Judkins
Book Reviews by Benjamin Judkins
Reviews of D. S. Farrer by Benjamin Judkins
development. Yet relatively few works have attempted to define
the ‘martial arts’, our signature concept. This article evaluates
a number of approaches to the problem by asking whether
‘lightsaber combat’ is a martial art. Inspired by a successful film
franchise, these increasingly popular practices combine elements
of historical swordsmanship, modern combat sports, stage
choreography and a fictional worldview to ‘recreate’ the fighting
methods of Jedi and Sith warriors. The rise of such hyper-
real fighting systems may force us to reconsider a number of
questions. What is the link between ‘authentic’ martial arts and
history? Can an activity be a martial art even if its students and
teachers do not claim it as such? Is our current body of theory
capable of exploring the rise of hyper-real practices? Most
importantly, what sort of theoretical work do we expect from
our definition of the ‘martial arts’?
Keywords: Mexico Profundo; Mesoamerica; pre-Hispanic; martial arts cultures; warrior philosophies.
Errata: The reference to James Lee on page 17 should read "James Wing Woo."
Autumn 2015
Issue 1
Table of Contents
Editorial
• Paul Bowman and Benjamin N. Judkins
Articles
• Paul Bowman, Asking the Question: Is Martial Arts Studies an Academic Field?
• Sixt Wetzler, Martial arts studies as Kulturwissenschaft: A possible theoretical framework
• D. S. Farrer, Efficacy and Entertainment in Martial Arts Studies: Anthropological Perspectives
• Jared Miracle, Imposing the Terms of the Battle: Donn F. Draeger, Count Dante, and the Struggle for American Martial Arts Identity
• Alexander Hay, The Art and Politics of Fence: Subtexts and Ideologies of Late 16th Century Fencing Manuals
Review Article
• Kyle Barrowman, History in the Making: Martial Arts between Planet Hollywood and Planet Hong Kong
Book Reviews
• The Creation of Wing Chun: A Social History of the Southern Chinese Martial Arts. 2015. Benjamin Judkins and Jon Nielson. State University of New York Press. 364 Pages. $90/£59.29. Reviewed by Douglas Wile
• Jet Li: Chinese Masculinity and Transnational Film Stardom. 2015. Sabrina Yu. Edinburgh University Press. 224 Pages. $34.95/£19.99. Reviewed by Wayne Wong
• Demonic Warfare: Daoism, Territorial Networks, and the History of a Ming Novel. 2015. Mark R. E. Meulenbeld. University of Hawai’i Press. 288 Pages. $57/£36.43. Reviewed by Scott P. Phillips
• Martial Arts Studies: Disrupting Disciplinary Boundaries. 2015. Paul Bowman. Rowman & Littlefield International. 208 Pages. $32.95/£22.95. Reviewed by Adam Frank
Benjamin N. Judkins holds a doctoral degree in political science from Columbia University. Jon Nielson is chief instructor at Wing Chun Hall in Salt Lake City, Utah.