Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society, 2004
We also derive results for the occupation number, luminosity function of cluster galaxies, group ... more We also derive results for the occupation number, luminosity function of cluster galaxies, group luminosity function and multiplicity function. Then, using some additional assumptions, we further derive results for biasing between mass and light and mass and galaxy number, light distribution function and the void probability distribution. Our results for the most part seem to match well with observations and previous expectations. We feel this is a potentially powerful way of modelling this relation, since the main inputs are readily testable against dark matter simulation results and galaxy surveys. (abridged)
Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society, 2006
We present a non-parametric, empirically based, model for associating galaxy luminosities with ha... more We present a non-parametric, empirically based, model for associating galaxy luminosities with halo/subhalo masses, based on a self-consistent treatment of subhalo mass loss and the subhalo mass function. We find that, at high mass, the mass-luminosity relation is almost independent of the actual luminosity function considered, when luminosity is scaled by the characteristic luminosity L*. Additionally, the shape of the total halo luminosity depends on the slope of the subhalo mass function. For these high mass, cluster sized haloes, we find that total luminosity scales as L_tot ~ M^0.88, while the luminosity of the first brightest galaxy has a much weaker dependence on halo mass, L_1 ~ M^0.28, in good agreement with observations and previous results. At low mass, the resulting slope of the mass-luminosity relation depends strongly of the faint end slope of the luminosity function, and we obtain a steep relation, with approximately L ~ M^4.5 in the K-band. The average number of galaxies per halo/cluster is also in very good agreement with observations, scaling as M^0.9. In general, we obtain a good agreement with several independent sets of observational data. We find that, when comparing with observations and for a flat cosmology, the model tends to prefer lower values for Omega_m and sigma_8. Within the WMAP+SDSS concordance plane of Tegmark et al. (2004), we find best agreement around Omega_m=0.25 and sigma_8=0.8, also in very good agreement with the results of the CMB+2dF study of Sanchez et al. (2005). We also check on possible corrections for observed mass based on a comparison of the equivalent number of haloes/clusters. Additionally, we include further checks on the model results based on the mass to light ratio, the occupation number, the group luminosity function and the multiplicity function. (abridged)
Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society, 2008
We revisit the longstanding question of whether first brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are stati... more We revisit the longstanding question of whether first brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are statistically drawn from the same distribution as other cluster galaxies or are ‘special’, using the new non-parametric, empirically based, model presented in Vale & Ostriker for associating galaxy luminosity with halo/subhalo masses.We introduce scatter in galaxy luminosity at fixed halo mass into this model, building a conditional luminosity function (CLF) by considering two possible models: a simple lognormal and a model based on the distribution of concentration in haloes of a given mass. We show that this model naturally allows an identification of halo/subhalo systems with groups and clusters of galaxies, giving rise to a clear central/satellite galaxy distinction, obtaining a special distribution for the BCGs.Finally, we use these results to build up the dependence of BCG magnitudes on cluster luminosity, focusing on two statistical indicators, the dispersion in BCG magnitude and the magnitude difference between the first and the second brightest galaxies. We compare our results with two simple models for BCGs: a statistical hypothesis that the BCGs are drawn from a universal distribution, and a cannibalism scenario merging two galaxies from this distribution. The statistical model is known to fail from work as far back as Tremaine & Richstone. We show that neither the statistical model nor the simplest possibility of cannibalism provides a good match for observations, while a more realistic cannibalism scenario works better. Our CLF models both give similar results, in good agreement with observations. Specifically, we find 〈m1〉 between −25 and −25.5 in the K band, σ(m1) ∼ 0.25 and 〈Δ12〉 between 0.6 and 0.8, for cluster luminosities in the range of 1012 to 1013 h−2 L⊙.
Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society, 2004
We also derive results for the occupation number, luminosity function of cluster galaxies, group ... more We also derive results for the occupation number, luminosity function of cluster galaxies, group luminosity function and multiplicity function. Then, using some additional assumptions, we further derive results for biasing between mass and light and mass and galaxy number, light distribution function and the void probability distribution. Our results for the most part seem to match well with observations and previous expectations. We feel this is a potentially powerful way of modelling this relation, since the main inputs are readily testable against dark matter simulation results and galaxy surveys. (abridged)
Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society, 2006
We present a non-parametric, empirically based, model for associating galaxy luminosities with ha... more We present a non-parametric, empirically based, model for associating galaxy luminosities with halo/subhalo masses, based on a self-consistent treatment of subhalo mass loss and the subhalo mass function. We find that, at high mass, the mass-luminosity relation is almost independent of the actual luminosity function considered, when luminosity is scaled by the characteristic luminosity L*. Additionally, the shape of the total halo luminosity depends on the slope of the subhalo mass function. For these high mass, cluster sized haloes, we find that total luminosity scales as L_tot ~ M^0.88, while the luminosity of the first brightest galaxy has a much weaker dependence on halo mass, L_1 ~ M^0.28, in good agreement with observations and previous results. At low mass, the resulting slope of the mass-luminosity relation depends strongly of the faint end slope of the luminosity function, and we obtain a steep relation, with approximately L ~ M^4.5 in the K-band. The average number of galaxies per halo/cluster is also in very good agreement with observations, scaling as M^0.9. In general, we obtain a good agreement with several independent sets of observational data. We find that, when comparing with observations and for a flat cosmology, the model tends to prefer lower values for Omega_m and sigma_8. Within the WMAP+SDSS concordance plane of Tegmark et al. (2004), we find best agreement around Omega_m=0.25 and sigma_8=0.8, also in very good agreement with the results of the CMB+2dF study of Sanchez et al. (2005). We also check on possible corrections for observed mass based on a comparison of the equivalent number of haloes/clusters. Additionally, we include further checks on the model results based on the mass to light ratio, the occupation number, the group luminosity function and the multiplicity function. (abridged)
Monthly Notices of The Royal Astronomical Society, 2008
We revisit the longstanding question of whether first brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are stati... more We revisit the longstanding question of whether first brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are statistically drawn from the same distribution as other cluster galaxies or are ‘special’, using the new non-parametric, empirically based, model presented in Vale & Ostriker for associating galaxy luminosity with halo/subhalo masses.We introduce scatter in galaxy luminosity at fixed halo mass into this model, building a conditional luminosity function (CLF) by considering two possible models: a simple lognormal and a model based on the distribution of concentration in haloes of a given mass. We show that this model naturally allows an identification of halo/subhalo systems with groups and clusters of galaxies, giving rise to a clear central/satellite galaxy distinction, obtaining a special distribution for the BCGs.Finally, we use these results to build up the dependence of BCG magnitudes on cluster luminosity, focusing on two statistical indicators, the dispersion in BCG magnitude and the magnitude difference between the first and the second brightest galaxies. We compare our results with two simple models for BCGs: a statistical hypothesis that the BCGs are drawn from a universal distribution, and a cannibalism scenario merging two galaxies from this distribution. The statistical model is known to fail from work as far back as Tremaine & Richstone. We show that neither the statistical model nor the simplest possibility of cannibalism provides a good match for observations, while a more realistic cannibalism scenario works better. Our CLF models both give similar results, in good agreement with observations. Specifically, we find 〈m1〉 between −25 and −25.5 in the K band, σ(m1) ∼ 0.25 and 〈Δ12〉 between 0.6 and 0.8, for cluster luminosities in the range of 1012 to 1013 h−2 L⊙.
Uploads
Papers by António Vale