gcc-toolchain does not provide cc in PATH #556
Labels
No labels
deprecation
good first issue
help-wanted
kind
bug
kind
moreinfo
kind
system-test
kind
wishlist
kind
wont-fix
package
fix
security-fixes
team-ai
team-audio
team-bioinformatics
team-bootstrap
team-core
team-core-packages
team-cpp
team-crypto
team-documentation
team-electronics
team-emacs
team-embedded
team-games
team-gnome
team-go
team-haskell
team-home
team-hpc
team-hurd
team-installer
team-java
team-javascript
team-julia
team-kde
team-kernel
team-lisp
team-localization
team-lxqt
team-mozilla
team-ocaml
team-python
team-qt
team-r
team-racket
team-release
team-reproduciblebuilds
team-ruby
team-rust
team-science
team-sugar
team-sysadmin
team-telephony
team-tex
team-translations
team-xfce
team-zig
user-reviewed
No milestone
No project
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
guix/guix#556
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
guix describeoutput:The
gcc-toolchainpackage does not provideccinPATH, as might be expected:I'm sorry if my response is not very helpful. I've came across this issue as well while learning about GUIX, in my notes I saved this link from a report made 8 years ago:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/28629
However, if using
guix shellI think you can add this to the top of yourmanifest.scmfiles in case you are working with projects of your own:I found placing this before any module/use-module definitions is enough for
LD_LIBRARY_PATHissues that arise with other programs out there.If you don't like that approach I would suggest looking the SRFI-98 section in the Guile Scheme manual if you want a "cleaner" approach. Happy hacking!
This is intended behaviour. see also
(BTW, I hope @mhw can provide a link to the discussion about not adding
ccsymlink forgcc-toolchainHere are some of the early discussions on this topic that I found: