[RDNF #11] fix: skipped jobs have no result & fix: favor command-line over files & chore: fix some comments #143

Merged
earl-warren merged 3 commits from :nektos-into-forgejo-7 into main 2025-06-09 10:25:44 +00:00
Contributor
https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2274 https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2276 https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2279
Signed-off-by: lvyaoting <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <[email protected]>
This impacts:
- envs
- inputs
- secrets
- vars
merge skipping jobs have no results
Some checks failed
checks / unit (pull_request) Successful in 2m55s
checks / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
/ cascade (pull_request_target) Failing after 29s
8d0747cbe1
Contributor

cascading-pr updated at forgejo/runner#597

cascading-pr updated at https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/597
Contributor

Note to self: technically https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2274 is a breaking change but this fork of ACT makes no promise yet regarding breaking changes and IMHO the odds that someone notices are extremely low to non-existent. They would have to be in a situation where they are used to files overriding CLI argument, which I doubt ever happens.

Note to self: technically https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2274 is a breaking change but this fork of ACT makes no promise yet regarding breaking changes and IMHO the odds that someone notices are extremely low to non-existent. They would have to be in a situation where they are used to files overriding CLI argument, which I doubt ever happens.
earl-warren scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2025-06-09 09:57:46 +00:00
earl-warren deleted branch nektos-into-forgejo-7 2025-06-09 10:25:44 +00:00
Contributor

I entirely missed the regression introduced in !143 (commit 8d0747cbe1) which is different from the commit it cherry-picked https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2276/files because of an unmarked conflict resolution.

In the end this is my responsibility as a reviewer but yet another example of why it is important to document conflict resolution: they may have a high impact.

I entirely missed the regression introduced in https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/143/commits/8d0747cbe1ea0def25b381e2ec8caeb5fafb9394 which is different from the commit it cherry-picked https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2276/files because of an unmarked conflict resolution. In the end this is my responsibility as a reviewer but yet another example of why it is important to document conflict resolution: they may have a high impact.
Contributor

Regression fixed at #172

Regression fixed at https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/172
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forgejo/act!143
No description provided.