Neurology

Pantomime of tool use is a frequently used test for apraxia. For basic cognitive neuroscience, pantomime of tool use is of interest because it constitutes a link between instrumental and communicative manual actions. We used lesion subtraction analysis to determine the locations specifically associated with defective pantomime of tool use in patients with left-brain damage and aphasia. Subtraction of lesions of patients with normal pantomime from those with defective pantomime yielded a maximum difference in the inferior frontal gyrus and adjacent portions of the insula and precentral gyrus. This result remained essentially the same when possible confounding influences of impaired language comprehension and of lesion size were controlled by selecting patients equated on these measures and when only patients with preserved imitation of gestures were considered. By contrast, parietal lesions did not have a specific impact on pantomime. We speculate that the vulnerability of pantomime to lesions of left inferior frontal cortex is due to the high demands on selection of a very restrained range of features out of the many features that may come to mind when imagining the actual use of the tool.

To determine whether the left and right hemispheres play specific roles in goal-directed movements, prehension with the ipsilesional hand was tested in patients with unilateral brain damage. The task required that subjects rotate the hand while reaching for a bar that was presented in different orientations in the frontal plane, thus making high demands on visuospatial processing. The grasped bar had to be put into a hole: under one task condition the placement of the bar was specified, while under another it was not. The constrained task required that the subject anticipate the placing action when planning the initial prehensile movement. Grip selection, reaction times, kinematics of the transport movement, and coordination of hand rotation during transport were assessed in ipsilesional movements of 22 patients with either left or right brain damage (LBD and RBD) and in control subjects. Patients in both groups exhibited performance deficits; however, impairment characteristics differed profoundly between the groups. RBD patients showed prolonged reaction time and degraded kinematics in the unconstrained task, whereas LBD patients performed relatively well when only the orientation of the bar varied, but slowly and frequently incoordinated when the subsequent action was specified. Our findings emphasize the dominant role of the right hemisphere in processing visuospatial aspects of goal-directed movements, whereas the left hemisphere subserves non-spatial aspects of preplanning under increased task demands. Correlations of the patient's performance with results from clinical tests showed that neither deficits in visuospatial perception of RBD patients nor apraxia of LBD patients could account for the observed abnormalities in the use of the ipsilesional hand.

Movement goals and task mechanics differ substantially between actual tool use and corresponding pantomimes. In addition, apraxia seems to be more severe during pantomime than during actual tool use. Comparisons of these two modes of action execution using quantitative methods of movement analyses are rare. In the present study, repetitive scooping movements with a ladle from a bowl into a plate were recorded and movement kinematics was analyzed. Brain-damaged patients using their ipsilesional hand and healthy control subjects were tested in three conditions: pantomime, demonstration with the tool only, and actual use in the normal context. Analysis of the hand trajectories during the transport component revealed clear differences between the tasks, such as slower actual use and moderate deficits in patients with left brain damage (LBD). LBD patients were particularly impaired in the scooping component: LBD patients with apraxia exhibited reduced hand rotation at the bowl and the plate. The deficit was most obvious during pantomime but actual use was also affected, and reduced hand rotation was consistent across conditions as indicated by strong pair-wise correlations between task conditions. In healthy control subjects, correlations between movement parameters were most evident between the pantomime and demonstration conditions but weak in correlation pairs involving actual use. From these findings and published neuroimaging evidence, we conclude that for a specific tool-use action, common motor schemas are activated but are adjusted and modified according to the actual task constraints and demands. An apraxic LBD individual can show a deficit across all three action conditions, but the severity can differ substantially between conditions.

The ability to predict and anticipate the mechanical demands of the environment promotes smooth and skillful motor actions. Thus, the finger forces produced to grasp and lift an object are scaled to the physical properties such as weight. While grip force scaling is well established for neutral objects, only few studies analyzed objects known from daily routine and none studied grip forces. In the present study, eleven healthy subjects each lifted twelve objects of everyday life that encompassed a wide range of weights. The finger pads were covered with force sensors that enabled the measurement of grip force. A scale registered load forces. In a control experiment, the objects were wrapped into paper to prevent recognition by the subjects. Data from the first lift of each object confirmed that object weight was anticipated by adequately scaled forces. The maximum grip force rate during the force increase phase emerged as the most reliable measure to verify that weight was actually predicted and to characterize the precision of this prediction, while other force measures were scaled to object weight also when object identity was not known. Variability and linearity of the grip force-weight relationship improved for time points reached after liftoff, suggesting that sensory information refined the force adjustment. The same mechanism seemed to be involved with unrecognizable objects, though a lower precision was reached. Repeated lifting of the same object within a second and third presentation block did not improve the precision of the grip force scaling. Either practice was too variable or the motor system does not prioritize the optimization of the internal representation when objects are highly familiar.

Humans differ from other animals in the way they can skilfully and precisely operate or invent tools to facilitate their everyday life. Tools have dominated our home, travel and work environment, becoming an integral step for our motor skills development. What happens when the part of the brain responsible for tool use is damaged in our adult life due to a cerebrovascular accident? How does daily life change when we lose the previously mastered ability to make use of the objects around us? How do patients suffering from compromised tool use cope with food preparation, personal hygiene, grooming, housework, or use of home appliances? In this literature review we present a state of the art for single and multiple tool use research, with a focus on the impact that apraxia (impaired ability to perform tool-based actions) and action disorganization syndrome (ADS; impaired ability to carry out multi-step actions) have on activities of daily living (ADL). Firstly, we summarize the behavioral studies investigating the impact of apraxia and other comorbidity syndromes, such as neglect or visual extinction, on ADL. We discuss the hallmarks of the compromised tool use in terms of the sequencing of action steps, conceptual errors committed, spatial motor control, and temporal organization of the movement. In addition, we present an up-to-date overview of the neuroimaging and lesion analyses studies that provide an insight into neural correlates of tool use in the human brain and functional changes in the neural organization following a stroke, in the context of ADL. Finally we discuss the current practice in neurorehabilitation of ADL in apraxia and ADS aiming at increasing patients' independence.

Thirty six patients in the chronic stage after severe closed head injury were examined with tests of executive function, memory, intelligence, and fimctional capacities in daily livlng. Correlations were sought between test results and Tc-99m-HMPAO uptake offrontal, temporal, and thalamic regions assessed by SPECT. Neither the number ofsiganificant correlation coefficients between memory tests and regional uptake nor that between temporal uptake and tests exceeded chance. For the remaining tests, correlations to thalamic regions were stronger than those to the frontal regions, and those to right brain regions stronger than those to homologous left brain regions. Relationships of thalamic isotope uptake to neuropsychological performance may reflect the impact of diffuse brain damage and particularly of diffuse axonal injury on mental capacities.

We correlated impaired unimanual motor learning with the lesion site in 53 patients with chronic lesions predominantly of the frontal lobe. The lesions were assessed using computed tomography (CT), then transferred to standard templates of nine slices parallel to the canthomeatal plane and digitized with a raster matrix of 3 mm by 3 mm width. The learning task was to track a moving target on a computer screen with a dot guided by the preferred hand, while the horizontal coupling between hand movement and screen was inverted. The mean tracking error was recorded over eight successive trials of 80 s duration. If the mean error of the last three trials was not lower than that of the first three trials, impaired motor learning was assumed. We correlated performance and lesion with a contingency table analysis for each raster element. Impaired motor learning was associated with a lesion within the supplementary motor area and adjacent anterior cingulate, and within the anterior insular region. Our results indicate that these regions are critical for motor learning and functional plasticity in man. Our data support activation patterns obtained with positron emission tomography.