– Allemagne: R. MERKEL (expertise pour le Bundestag concernant le § 1631d BGB), Stellungnahme zu dem Regierungentwurf eines Gesetzes über den Umfang der Personensorge bei einer Beschneidung des männlichen Kindes, 2012, 17/11295.

– Allemagne: R. MERKEL, Die Haut eines Anderen, SZ du 30-08-2012.

– Canada: Société canadienne de pédiatrie, La circoncision néonatale revisitée, 1996.

– Canada: Société canadienne du SIDA,  La circoncision au Canada.

– Canada: College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, Infant Male Circumcision, Policy Manual, Resource Manual for Physicians, Vancouver, BC: College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, 2004.

– Canada: Kendel D. A., Caution Against Routine Circumcision of Newborn Male Infants (Memorandum to physicians and surgeons of Saskatchewan), Saskatoon: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, February 20, 2002.

– France : Conseil National du Sida, Rapport sur la circoncision : une modalité discutable de réduction des risques de transmission du VIH, 24 mai 2007.

– Italie: Comitato nazionale per la bioetica, Problemi bioetici in una società multietnica: La circoncisione: profili bioetici, Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri, Dipartimento per l’informazione e l’editoria, Roma 1998.

– Italie: Parere, Commissione dei Medici dell’OMCEO della Provincia di Torino, Parere deontologico della Commissione medici dell’OMCEO della Provincia di Torino sulla pratica medica della circoncisione di neonati e bambini di carattere rituale, 6 gennaio 2006.

– Italie: Ufficio Stampa FNOMCeO – Federazione Nazionale degli Ordini dei Medici Chirurghi e degli Odontoiatri (a cura di), Benato: circoncisione, tra bioetica e dovere religioso.

– ONU: Rapport d’activité du Rapporteur spécial sur la liberté de religion ou de conviction, Heiner Bielefeldt, Élimination de toutes les formes d’intolérance fondées sur la religion, 5 août 2015,  points 71 à 73 et 78.

 

– Pays-Bas: Royal Dutch Medical Association (Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst-KNMG), Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, 2010.

– Royaume-Uni: Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 122 (1992), Legislating the Criminal Code: Offences  Against the Person and General Principles.

– Royaume-Uni: Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 134 (1994), Consent and Offences Against the  Person.

– Royaume-Uni: Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 139 (1995), Consent in the Criminal Law.

– Royaume-Uni: Home Office, Violence: Reforming the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Home Office, London, 1998.

– Royaume-Uni: G. Smith, Children’s Perspectives on Believing and Belonging, National Children’s Bureau for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2005, 84 p.

– Royaume-Uni: British Medical Association, Medical Ethics Committee, The law and ethics of male circumcision – guidance for doctors, London: British Medical Association, 2003 (revised 15 June 2006).

– Royaume-Uni: General Medical Council, Personal beliefs and medical practice, General Medical Council, London, 2013.

– Royaume-Uni: Law Commission, Offences against the person, scoping Paper, forthcoming 2014.

– Suède: Rapport sur la circoncision de la Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (Bet. 2009/10:SoU 11 p. 50 ff.).

– Tasmanie/Australie: Tasmania Law Reform Institute, Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision, final report n° 17, 2012, 101 p.

– Tasmanie/Australie: Tasmania Law Reform Institute, Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision, issues paper n° 14, 2009, 65 p.

– Union Européenne: Discrimination and hate crime against Jews in EU Member States: experiences and perceptions of anti-Semitism, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2013, 76 p.

 

---

---