Andrea guido
PhD Student since September 2016.
Andrea works at the Laboratory for Experimental Anthropology, Lille Catholic University. His research interest broadly embraces the Determinants and Evolution of Human Cooperation. In particular, he is interested in studying the effect of networks and group sorting on the extent of cooperation in social dilemmas, using a mix of theoretical and experimental methods.
Web: https://sites.google.com/site/andreaguidouni/home
Supervisors: Giuseppe Attanasi and Nicolas Vaillant
Address: 60 bis rue du Port, Lille 59800
Andrea works at the Laboratory for Experimental Anthropology, Lille Catholic University. His research interest broadly embraces the Determinants and Evolution of Human Cooperation. In particular, he is interested in studying the effect of networks and group sorting on the extent of cooperation in social dilemmas, using a mix of theoretical and experimental methods.
Web: https://sites.google.com/site/andreaguidouni/home
Supervisors: Giuseppe Attanasi and Nicolas Vaillant
Address: 60 bis rue du Port, Lille 59800
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (28)
Uploads
Drafts by Andrea guido
developing a multivariate regression model.
We all have a car and in the moment of purchasing we can choose among different models. So the prices
vary according to the different optional or different engine, different needs.
But nobody knows that our choices make the prices. It seems a banal assertion, but we can also rephrase it
in : “nobody knows how and in which measure our choices influence prices”.
Our intention is to quantify the effect of our choices by a model that includes the most important variable
that should influence prices.
The paper starts with a short description of the parent population, so follows the description of the data
sample. Subsequently the aim of the model will be illustrated both in qualitative terms and in quantitative
terms.
Every data processing is done with Gretl.
Papers by Andrea guido
social dilemma games: public goods games, common pool resources, and the prisoner’s
dilemma. The 62 surveyed papers study the effect of different sorting mechanisms
– endogenous, endogenous with the option to play the game, and exogenous – on
cooperation rates. Our survey shows that cooperators are highly sensitive to the
presence of free-riders, independently of the sorting mechanism. We complement the
survey with a meta-analysis showing no difference in terms of cooperation between
studies implementing an endogenous and exogenous sorting. What is more, we find
that it is no more likely for a cooperator to be matched with like-minded partners in
endogenously formed groups than in exogenously formed groups. These observations
are related. As we show in the survey, the success of a sorting method in matching
like-minded individuals and the levels of cooperation are closely interlinked.
developing a multivariate regression model.
We all have a car and in the moment of purchasing we can choose among different models. So the prices
vary according to the different optional or different engine, different needs.
But nobody knows that our choices make the prices. It seems a banal assertion, but we can also rephrase it
in : “nobody knows how and in which measure our choices influence prices”.
Our intention is to quantify the effect of our choices by a model that includes the most important variable
that should influence prices.
The paper starts with a short description of the parent population, so follows the description of the data
sample. Subsequently the aim of the model will be illustrated both in qualitative terms and in quantitative
terms.
Every data processing is done with Gretl.
social dilemma games: public goods games, common pool resources, and the prisoner’s
dilemma. The 62 surveyed papers study the effect of different sorting mechanisms
– endogenous, endogenous with the option to play the game, and exogenous – on
cooperation rates. Our survey shows that cooperators are highly sensitive to the
presence of free-riders, independently of the sorting mechanism. We complement the
survey with a meta-analysis showing no difference in terms of cooperation between
studies implementing an endogenous and exogenous sorting. What is more, we find
that it is no more likely for a cooperator to be matched with like-minded partners in
endogenously formed groups than in exogenously formed groups. These observations
are related. As we show in the survey, the success of a sorting method in matching
like-minded individuals and the levels of cooperation are closely interlinked.