
William Duffy
Bristol Community College, Lash Center for Teaching and Learning, Special Programs Coordinator- Teaching and Learning
Related Authors
Penelope J. Goodman
University of Leeds
Richard P Martin
Stanford University
Mirko Canevaro
University of Edinburgh
Marta García Morcillo
Newcastle University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Giulia Sissa
Ucla
Enrico Cirelli
Università di Bologna
Silvia Barbantani
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Catholic University of the Sacred Heart)
Erman Gören
Istanbul University
Ian Rutherford
University of Reading
InterestsView All (26)
Uploads
Papers by William Duffy
In this paper, we analyze the metalanguage of epic poetry from a cognitive linguistic perspective, demonstrating that a constellation of conceptual metaphors in Greek delivers a view of the tradition as rigid, immovable, and unbroken. Specifically, we show that metaphors drawing on concepts of physical uprightness, ordered sequences, linkage, and building construction, though recruiting images from different domains and so failing to provide a consistent overall image to conceptualization, jointly portray the tradition in these terms. This metaphorically defined understanding of the tradition can be contrasted with the view of performance captured by derivatives of ῥαψῳδ- which portray the poem as “stitched together” extemporaneously from “stock” elements, as well as with ancient descriptions of epic composition which noticeably omit reference to formulaic structure. In this sense, these metaphors function as a “hidden ideology”, obfuscating the true nature of the oral-formulaic tradition, and permitting it to take on a degree of social authority that it might not otherwise possess.
In this paper, we analyze the metalanguage of epic poetry from a cognitive linguistic perspective, demonstrating that a constellation of conceptual metaphors in Greek delivers a view of the tradition as rigid, immovable, and unbroken. Specifically, we show that metaphors drawing on concepts of physical uprightness, ordered sequences, linkage, and building construction, though recruiting images from different domains and so failing to provide a consistent overall image to conceptualization, jointly portray the tradition in these terms. This metaphorically defined understanding of the tradition can be contrasted with the view of performance captured by derivatives of ῥαψῳδ- which portray the poem as “stitched together” extemporaneously from “stock” elements, as well as with ancient descriptions of epic composition which noticeably omit reference to formulaic structure. In this sense, these metaphors function as a “hidden ideology”, obfuscating the true nature of the oral-formulaic tradition, and permitting it to take on a degree of social authority that it might not otherwise possess.