gary minda

Followers

Following

Public Views

Long time resident of New York City, now living in Old Mission, north of traverse City Michigan. Incubating critical theory—Adorno and Jameson and fellow travelers. Getting a handle on what appears to be the last stage of late capitalism and American fetishism with fascism. Working on a book about the life and times of Michael Davitt, an Irish nationalist who is an important figure in the rise of the Land League in Ireland.
Supervisors: LawerenceJoseph Poet
Phone: 718-928-8407
Address: 18395
Center Road\Old Mission, traverse city, michigan 49686

less

John Clark

Loyola University New Orleans

Remo Caponi

University of Cologne

Nadia Kaneva

University of Denver

Emilia Angelova

Concordia University (Canada)

Julia Hell

University of Michigan

Noe Cornago

University of the Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

Gary Feinman

Field Museum

Andrew W Wilkins

Goldsmiths, University of London

Karen Ng

Vanderbilt University

Simon Susen

City, University of London

InterestsView All (10)

Uploads

Papers by gary minda

1. Origins of Modern Jurisprudence

Commentary: The Dragon in the Cave

Brooklyn law review, 1997

... the efficacy of initiates in "social legislation." White, Revisiting, supra note 5,... more

Congressional De-Authorization of War and the Presidential Veto: 'The Catch-22 of the Iraq War

Social Science Research Network, Oct 3, 2007

There are some who continue to believe that Congress can recapture its war power by refusing to p... more There are some who continue to believe that Congress can recapture its war power by refusing to pass future supplemental appropriations to support the war but such a view is pure fantasy if we simply go on as we have and conclude that the President is the 'decider' because Congress has given to the President the authority to be the 'decider' on the question of war and peace. The power of the purse is not likely to be effective as a limit on the Chief Executive so long as he is exercising his duty to 'enforce law.' The other tried but failed alternative of enactment of supplemental appropriations with a legislative rider calling for a date certain for the recall of all troops from Iraq is also highly problematic. The problem is that the President has vetoed the legislation and there is no two-thirds majority needed to override. Even if Congress could override a presidential veto the President is still not likely to go along with it; he will argue that he alone has the authority to determine how troops should be deployed during war. It is the presidential claim to apparent constitutional authority to wage war that ultimately ties the hands of Congress on the war. Appropriation measures are an indirect means for expressing disapproval of a war because it sends a misleading and potentially damaging message - Congress doesn't want to support the troops, but it is unwilling to stop the war. It would be better if Congress faced up to its constitutional responsibility it ducked when it authorized the war in 2002. Indeed, forthright action of by Congress on the war issue might galvanize public opinion in support of congressional action. The question that has been ignored but until now is whether the 2002 AUMF that purported to give President Bush the power to start a war against Iraq was a legally effective authorization. This Article seeks to make a contribution to the war powers debate by expanding on an argument once made by the late John Hart Ely for support of the view that the 2002 AUMF fails to satisfy the constitutional test for a valid war authorization.

Employment Law -- 1989

Syracuse Law Review, 1990

Monopoly Pricing on Campus: New York's Textbook Access Act

Download

Democratic Pluralism in the Era of Downsizing

California western law review, 1997

Download

Interest Groups, Political Freedom, and Antitrust

Hastings Law Journal, 1990

Download

Of Law, the River and Legal Education

Nova Law Review, 1986

Rediscovering Progressive Labor Politics

7.“Rejouer les crimes” 1 Theater vs. Video “Rejouer les crimes” 1 Theater vs. Video (pp. 119-135)

Los movimientos del derecho y la economía y de los estudios jurídicos críticos en el derecho norteamericano

Globalization, Decline of the Nation-State, and Foucault

Routledge eBooks, Dec 10, 2003

Interest Groups, Political Freedom, and Antitrust: A Modern Reassessment of the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine

Hastings Law Journal, 1990

Download

Lessons From the Financial Meltdown: Global Feminism, Critical Race Theory, and the Struggle for Substantive Justice

The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law, 2010

Download

The Lawyer - Economist at Chicago: Richard A. Posner and the Economic Analysis of Law

Download

Globalization of Culture (reviewing D. Yergin & J. Stanislaw, The Commanding Heights: The Battle Between Government and the Marketplace That is Remaking the Modern World (1998))

The Law and Economics and Critical Legal Studies Movements in American Law

Springer eBooks, 1989

One of the most striking new developments in American legal thought has been the almost simultane... more One of the most striking new developments in American legal thought has been the almost simultaneous emergence of two new intellectual “movements” in law-law and economics, and critical legal studies. The title, law and economics, as used in this chapter describes the work of legal-economic scholars who appeared on the academic scene in the early 1970s located primarily at the University of Chicago. There they developed a “new” methodology for doing economic analysis of law. What is new about law and economics is that its practitioners apply concepts developed in the theory of microeconomics, and in a branch of microeconomics called welfare economics, to systematically describe, reformulate, and critique nearly every aspect of law and the legal system. A central claim of the new law and economics is that the entire legal system can be analyzed and reformed through the application of a relatively small number of fundamental economic concepts [1].

Remembering the Eighties: the Lizard Goes to the AALS

Decoding Labor Law (reviewing J. Atleson, Values and Assumptions of Labor Law (1983))

The George Washington Law Review, 1984

Reflections [Law & Literature Conference]

Cardozo law review, 2005

1. Origins of Modern Jurisprudence

Commentary: The Dragon in the Cave

Brooklyn law review, 1997

... the efficacy of initiates in "social legislation." White, Revisiting, supra note 5,... more

Congressional De-Authorization of War and the Presidential Veto: 'The Catch-22 of the Iraq War

Social Science Research Network, Oct 3, 2007