
Cristina Inoue
Related Authors
C. Michael Hall
University of Canterbury/Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha
Julian D Reynolds
Trinity College Dublin
Benjamin Isakhan
Deakin University
Oliver P Richmond
The University of Manchester
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Noe Cornago
University of the Basque Country, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
George Lawson
The Australian National University
Kacper Szulecki
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
Cymene Howe
Rice University
InterestsView All (8)
Uploads
Books by Cristina Inoue
The concept of biodiversity international regime is familiar to scholars whose study fields are related to global environmental issues. Usually their focus is on the inter state relations and processes around the establishment and implementation of the global environmental conventions. Conservation biologists, environmental NGOs and agencies on the other hand tend to focus on experiences/projects implemented in the regional or local levels. However, fewer efforts are made to integrate global, regional and local levels.
Mamirauá was a biodiversity conservation and sustainable development project that joined researchers, international NGOs, national and regional governmental organs, one bilateral cooperation agency, the European Union and local communities. The results were the creation of a Sustainable Development Reserve and a research institute in a flooded forest area of Brazilian Amazonia. Even though it cannot be considered a response from the Brazilian government to the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD), Mamirauá is “in tune” with the Convention objectives and with broader normative and causal beliefs developed transnationally among conservationists.
My aim is to construct a concept of a global biodiversity regime to be used as an analytical framework. It encompasses the CBD principles, norms, and objectives, but also the other biodiversity related international agreements, the concepts and methodologies established by NGOs and bilateral and multilateral agencies, and the transnational and international flows of knowledge and resources towards local projects. The role of transnational networks like epistemic communities (Haas 1992) will also be considered. The concept of regime proposed here integrates the global and local dimensions, allowing us to capture experiences on the ground within one framework. Through such a framework it is possible to view the Mamirauá project in a global-local perspective. If we could see local initiatives within a global regime for biodiversity, the discussion on the effectiveness of the regime would be more grounded. What happens at the international level does not always reflect what is going on locally.
The two objectives of the book are inter-related: to identify key factors which resulted in the elaboration and implementation of the Mamirauá Project, considered well succeeded, and in the establishment of the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve; and to relate this initiative to the global biodiversity regime. To do so, my intention is to highlight the international and transnational factors that have acted locally and to point out the demonstrative value of Mamirauá for the regime. Therefore, the intention is to relate a local experience with global processes concerning biodiversity.
The research was based on primary and secondary sources and on interviews. My conclusion was that local experiences on biodiversity conservation and sustainable development implemented in several countries and the existence of transnational conservationist networks are interrelated factors. Both are part of a global biodiversity regime, and Mamirauá can be placed in such a context. Particularly, I related the existence of a conservation biology epistemic community to the Mamirauá initiative.
The concept of biodiversity international regime is familiar to scholars whose study fields are related to global environmental issues. Usually their focus is on the inter state relations and processes around the establishment and implementation of the global environmental conventions. Conservation biologists, environmental NGOs and agencies on the other hand tend to focus on experiences/projects implemented in the regional or local levels. However, fewer efforts are made to integrate global, regional and local levels.
Mamirauá was a biodiversity conservation and sustainable development project that joined researchers, international NGOs, national and regional governmental organs, one bilateral cooperation agency, the European Union and local communities. The results were the creation of a Sustainable Development Reserve and a research institute in a flooded forest area of Brazilian Amazonia. Even though it cannot be considered a response from the Brazilian government to the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD), Mamirauá is “in tune” with the Convention objectives and with broader normative and causal beliefs developed transnationally among conservationists.
My aim is to construct a concept of a global biodiversity regime to be used as an analytical framework. It encompasses the CBD principles, norms, and objectives, but also the other biodiversity related international agreements, the concepts and methodologies established by NGOs and bilateral and multilateral agencies, and the transnational and international flows of knowledge and resources towards local projects. The role of transnational networks like epistemic communities (Haas 1992) will also be considered. The concept of regime proposed here integrates the global and local dimensions, allowing us to capture experiences on the ground within one framework. Through such a framework it is possible to view the Mamirauá project in a global-local perspective. If we could see local initiatives within a global regime for biodiversity, the discussion on the effectiveness of the regime would be more grounded. What happens at the international level does not always reflect what is going on locally.
The two objectives of the book are inter-related: to identify key factors which resulted in the elaboration and implementation of the Mamirauá Project, considered well succeeded, and in the establishment of the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve; and to relate this initiative to the global biodiversity regime. To do so, my intention is to highlight the international and transnational factors that have acted locally and to point out the demonstrative value of Mamirauá for the regime. Therefore, the intention is to relate a local experience with global processes concerning biodiversity.
The research was based on primary and secondary sources and on interviews. My conclusion was that local experiences on biodiversity conservation and sustainable development implemented in several countries and the existence of transnational conservationist networks are interrelated factors. Both are part of a global biodiversity regime, and Mamirauá can be placed in such a context. Particularly, I related the existence of a conservation biology epistemic community to the Mamirauá initiative.
Papers by Cristina Inoue
The concept of biodiversity international regime is familiar to scholars whose study fields are related to global environmental issues. Usually their focus is on the inter state relations and processes around the establishment and implementation of the global environmental conventions. Conservation biologists, environmental NGOs and agencies on the other hand tend to focus on experiences/projects implemented in the regional or local levels. However, fewer efforts are made to integrate global, regional and local levels.
Mamirauá was a biodiversity conservation and sustainable development project that joined researchers, international NGOs, national and regional governmental organs, one bilateral cooperation agency, the European Union and local communities. The results were the creation of a Sustainable Development Reserve and a research institute in a flooded forest area of Brazilian Amazonia. Even though it cannot be considered a response from the Brazilian government to the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD), Mamirauá is “in tune” with the Convention objectives and with broader normative and causal beliefs developed transnationally among conservationists.
My aim is to construct a concept of a global biodiversity regime to be used as an analytical framework. It encompasses the CBD principles, norms, and objectives, but also the other biodiversity related international agreements, the concepts and methodologies established by NGOs and bilateral and multilateral agencies, and the transnational and international flows of knowledge and resources towards local projects. The role of transnational networks like epistemic communities (Haas 1992) will also be considered. The concept of regime proposed here integrates the global and local dimensions, allowing us to capture experiences on the ground within one framework. Through such a framework it is possible to view the Mamirauá project in a global-local perspective. If we could see local initiatives within a global regime for biodiversity, the discussion on the effectiveness of the regime would be more grounded. What happens at the international level does not always reflect what is going on locally.
The two objectives of the book are inter-related: to identify key factors which resulted in the elaboration and implementation of the Mamirauá Project, considered well succeeded, and in the establishment of the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve; and to relate this initiative to the global biodiversity regime. To do so, my intention is to highlight the international and transnational factors that have acted locally and to point out the demonstrative value of Mamirauá for the regime. Therefore, the intention is to relate a local experience with global processes concerning biodiversity.
The research was based on primary and secondary sources and on interviews. My conclusion was that local experiences on biodiversity conservation and sustainable development implemented in several countries and the existence of transnational conservationist networks are interrelated factors. Both are part of a global biodiversity regime, and Mamirauá can be placed in such a context. Particularly, I related the existence of a conservation biology epistemic community to the Mamirauá initiative.
The concept of biodiversity international regime is familiar to scholars whose study fields are related to global environmental issues. Usually their focus is on the inter state relations and processes around the establishment and implementation of the global environmental conventions. Conservation biologists, environmental NGOs and agencies on the other hand tend to focus on experiences/projects implemented in the regional or local levels. However, fewer efforts are made to integrate global, regional and local levels.
Mamirauá was a biodiversity conservation and sustainable development project that joined researchers, international NGOs, national and regional governmental organs, one bilateral cooperation agency, the European Union and local communities. The results were the creation of a Sustainable Development Reserve and a research institute in a flooded forest area of Brazilian Amazonia. Even though it cannot be considered a response from the Brazilian government to the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD), Mamirauá is “in tune” with the Convention objectives and with broader normative and causal beliefs developed transnationally among conservationists.
My aim is to construct a concept of a global biodiversity regime to be used as an analytical framework. It encompasses the CBD principles, norms, and objectives, but also the other biodiversity related international agreements, the concepts and methodologies established by NGOs and bilateral and multilateral agencies, and the transnational and international flows of knowledge and resources towards local projects. The role of transnational networks like epistemic communities (Haas 1992) will also be considered. The concept of regime proposed here integrates the global and local dimensions, allowing us to capture experiences on the ground within one framework. Through such a framework it is possible to view the Mamirauá project in a global-local perspective. If we could see local initiatives within a global regime for biodiversity, the discussion on the effectiveness of the regime would be more grounded. What happens at the international level does not always reflect what is going on locally.
The two objectives of the book are inter-related: to identify key factors which resulted in the elaboration and implementation of the Mamirauá Project, considered well succeeded, and in the establishment of the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve; and to relate this initiative to the global biodiversity regime. To do so, my intention is to highlight the international and transnational factors that have acted locally and to point out the demonstrative value of Mamirauá for the regime. Therefore, the intention is to relate a local experience with global processes concerning biodiversity.
The research was based on primary and secondary sources and on interviews. My conclusion was that local experiences on biodiversity conservation and sustainable development implemented in several countries and the existence of transnational conservationist networks are interrelated factors. Both are part of a global biodiversity regime, and Mamirauá can be placed in such a context. Particularly, I related the existence of a conservation biology epistemic community to the Mamirauá initiative.