- See previous BP Docs-Chat Summary February 19, 2025
- In attendance: @dcavins, @johnjamesjacoby, @narenin, @emaralive
- Slack Archive
- @emaralive will lead the next docs-chat meeting!
In summary, there were various arrival times in attendance to this meeting which did not afford a decent amount of time for conversation.
BP Documentation tracker status:
The stats – 58%, there was no change in percentage points – 58% ➡ 58%
NOTE: The stats remained flat due to no new issues were submitted and completions remained the same..
There is 1 (one) issue that is currently In Progress. For details see the In Progress section (Note: Project views are dynamic and are subject to change without notice).
Due to a reduction in the number of writers/authors, the documentation effort has slowed to a crawl.
Revisit the Update README with Documentation roadmap:
This was mainly a posting of a backstory regarding a previous effort to provide a Roadmap for the documentation effort that was represented by a Pull Request (Update README with Documentation roadmap). Additional actions to take place as part of the indicated Pull Request are, for example:
- Remove the data folder & it’s content, since we would have an archive branch that has this info, in the event we need to reference anything from that content.
- Remove 1-migrate-task.yml from the .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE folder since it is now obsolete and will exist in the archive branch.
- Remove 3-ignore-task.yml from the .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE folder since it is now obsolete and will exist in the archive branch.
- Rename 2-add-task.yml to 1-add-task.yml, keeping a similar numeric prefix.
- Rename 4-update-task.yml to 2-update-task.yml, keeping a similar numeric prefix.
- Create a folder named roadmap, which will contain any detailed info that further describes/defines the top-level roadmap (as spelled out by the final version of the README.md), e.g., there would be links from the roadmap (README.md to whatever detailed .md files that are created).
The last bullet item may or may not be required, it will all depend on the amount of information that will be used to convey the Roadmap.
There was a brief “after the meeting” conversation regarding the naming of the archived (original) branch. A consensus was:
- There should be a branch (archive) that represents the original content prior to any changes to the trunk branch
- On the table was a possible name of “version_1” for this original (archive) branch.
Note: This agenda item is slated to be on the agenda for the next documentation meeting as a continuance.
Open Floor:
Due to time constraints, this agenda item was forgone.
Next Docs-Chat
Our next documentation meeting will happen on March 19, 2025, at 19:00 UTC in #BuddyPress.