Finished three more books.
First was the fifth volume in Armistead Maupin’s Tales of The City series, Significant Others. It’s now 1983, and the denizens of Barbary Lane are getting on with their lives. If you’re hooked on Micheal, Brian, Mary Anne, Dee-Dee, D’Or, and Mrs Madrigal, you’ll want to read this, if not, not.
Next up are a pair of counterpoint books. A couple of weeks ago I was involved in an exchange on another BLOG about the provenance of the USS Constellation which currently graces Baltimore’s Inner Harbor. In an effort to come to some sort of conclusion for myself, I read both the standard “pro-1797 Constellation” work, USS Constellation: From Frigate to Sloop of War by Geoffrey M. Footner and the standard “pro-1854 Constellation” work Fouled anchors: The Constellation Question Answered by Dana M Wegner. Ironically, both authors cite exactly the same evidence and agree on all the salient facts, they simply disagree on the definition of what constitutes a “new ship”.
• Both sides agree that the USS Constellation, built at Fells Point MD in 1797, was broken up at Gosport Navy Yard in 1854.
• Both authors further agree that the usable materials from that ship were salvaged and used in the construction of a sloop of war that was being built a couple of hundred feet away from the dry-dock where the Constellation was being broken up.
• Both men even agree that the new sloop of war was built to a newly drafted plan or set of blue prints, which was similar to, but by no means identical to the plans of the 1797 Constellation. For example the new ship was 10 ft longer, a couple of feet wider, and a couple of feet shorter, with different vertical deck spacing.
• Both men even agree that about 25% of the materials used to construct the sloop of war were salvaged from the 1797 Constellation.
So what’s the argument? Well, Wegner maintains that a ship built to a different plan, with 75% new materials can’t be considered, in any meaningful way, to be a continuation of the ship that donated the material. Footner, on the other hand maintains that since Congress never specifically authorized a new ship, then the sloop is “legally” the same ship as the 1797 ship, even though it has only about 25% of the original material and looks (to a trained seaman) completely different.
Where you fall on this controversy is pretty much a matter of opinion, but for me, I tend to side with Wegner. When I visited the Constellation I wasn’t looking at the guns that subdued Insurgente, nor was I standing on the deck where Truxton received her Captain’s surrender. Of course, YMMV.
39 for the year