Susan Thieme
Related Authors
Muqtedar Khan
University of Delaware
Josiah Heyman
University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP)
Dominik Wujastyk
University of Alberta
Andreas Umland
National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Timur Dadabaev
University of Tsukuba
Remo Caponi
University of Cologne
James Mallinson
University of Oxford
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Evren Balta
Ozyegin University
John Heathershaw
University of Exeter
Uploads
Papers by Susan Thieme
How do potentially market driven modes of governance manifest themselves in the everyday activities of nurses and physicians in a hospital? How does it relate to professional understandings of “good cure and care”?
Abstract:
The development of the health care system in Switzerland has recently been driven by different processes such as economic rationalization, bureaucrati-zation, or digitalization, while maintaining professional notions of ‘good cure and care.’ Drawing on qualitative data from a Swiss acute hospital, we analyze how potentially market driven modes of governance manifest them-selves in the everyday activities of nurses and physicians. We show how professional understandings of ‘good cure and care’ remain persistent and intermingle with logics that we call economic rationalities, manifesting in the four interrelated issues of financial pressure, bureaucratization, time pres-sure, and staff shortage.
How do potentially market driven modes of governance manifest themselves in the everyday activities of nurses and physicians in a hospital? How does it relate to professional understandings of “good cure and care”?
Abstract:
The development of the health care system in Switzerland has recently been driven by different processes such as economic rationalization, bureaucrati-zation, or digitalization, while maintaining professional notions of ‘good cure and care.’ Drawing on qualitative data from a Swiss acute hospital, we analyze how potentially market driven modes of governance manifest them-selves in the everyday activities of nurses and physicians. We show how professional understandings of ‘good cure and care’ remain persistent and intermingle with logics that we call economic rationalities, manifesting in the four interrelated issues of financial pressure, bureaucratization, time pres-sure, and staff shortage.