Dedi S Adhuri
Dr. Dedi Supriadi ADHURI has over 20 years of experience in research on social conflict, ethnicity, marine resource management/governance (community-based and co-management), fisheries conflict, post disaster coastal/fisheries rehabilitation/development and community development. In the last two years he also involved in studies on coastal communities and climate change as well as cultural heritage management in Indonesia. Other than from formal education at the Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University (ANU), Canberra, Australia, he has accumulated knowledge on the above issues trough his experience as the coordinator of the Maritime Study Group at the Research Center for Society and Culture, Indonesian Institute of Sciences in Jakarta and various fellowship programs he has participated. The latter includes fellowship at the Resource management in Asia and Pacific Program (RMAP) at the ANU; Wageningen University and Research Center in the Netherlands; Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN), Kyoto; Refugee Studies Center, Oxford University; two year post-doc fellowship at the Policy, Economics and Social Science Discipline, WorldFish Center in Penang, Malaysia and two and half years scientist position in the same institution. In term of region, he started his work in Maluku, Eastern Indonesia since early 1990s which is continued until presently. He also widens his studies to cover many places in Indonesia such as Papua, East and West Nusa Tenggara, Poso (Central Sulawesi), East Kalimantan, Bali, Jawa, Bangka-Belitung, Riau, Aceh on Sumatra Island, Lombok and Sumbawa in West Nusa Tenggara.
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Article by Dedi S Adhuri
ABSTRACT This paper discusses the socio-cultural and civilization intersections among nations connected by the Indian Ocean, from Indonesian perspective. It focuses on three different but connected issues, these are 1) the sailing history which is seen as the process of interaction involving socio-cultural exchange of involved nations; 2) the products of the interactions, and; 3) the diaspora of Indian ocean connected nations. In regard to the first, this paper argues that various ethnic groups in Indonesian had long been involved in the history of Indian Ocean sailing tradition. Indonesians acted both as hosts of the coming of various nations as well as the visitors to various countries as far as Middle East, Africa, India, Southeast Asian countries to the east and north and Australia to the south. The products of these long lasting and intensive interactions are mutual adoptions of social-cultural elements and even civilization among involved nations. Language, religions, social structure, ancient monuments such as temples, mosques are some examples of the products of the processes. Diaspora of Indonesian ethnic groups in various Indian ocean countries and the diaspora of various nations in Indonesia are other form of these cultural intersections. Unlike the adoptions of socio-cultural elements mentioned earlier that have taken place in the past, the diasporas demonstrate that these interactions and exchanges are not only a history but continues processes until the present time. These are expressed by the interactions of diaspora communities with their host nations as well as their interactions with their countries of origin.
transitions to contemporary forms of governance like the ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF)—the
focus of our study. We document and critically reflect on participatory diagnosis processes and outcomes
at sites in Indonesia, Philippines, Solomon Islands and Tanzania. These sites were part of an international project on the implementation of the EAF and differed widely in institutional and operational contexts.
The Participatory Diagnosis and Adaptive Management framework and the “issue radar” diagnosis map were used to identify, evaluate and address factors associated with navigating management transitions towards the EAF. We found that many challenges and priority actions identified by participants were similar across the four study countries. Participants emphasized habitat restoration, particularly
mangrove rehabilitation, and livelihood enhancement. The importance of strengthening governance entities, networks and processes (e.g., harmonization of policies, education and awareness of policies) was also a prominent outcome of the diagnosis. Site-specific factors were also explored together with the differing views among stakeholders. We conclude that diagnosis frameworks are indeed useful tools for guiding management transitions in fisheries, particularly where they enable flexibility in approaches to diagnosing problems and applying solutions to local contexts.
sumberdaya alam seperti apa yang memungkinkan tercapainya pemanfaatan optimal sumberdaya alam sedemikian rupa sehingga kegiatan tersebut dapat menyumbangkan sesuatu
pada peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat tanpa menganggu keberlangsungan (sustainability) dari sumberdaya alam itu sendiri. Untuk keperluan itu, pengevaluasian terhadap praktik pengelolaan yang telah ada tentu sangatlah berguna. Melalui evaluasi, kita bisa belajar kelemahan dan kelebihannya. Dengan pelajaran itu, perumusan pola manajemen yang baru akan berlandaskan pada kondisi yang telah ada dan bukan sesuatu
yang diimpor begitu saja dari luar tanpa mempertimbangkan relevansi kontekstualnya.
Dilandasi logika seperti di atas, tulisan ini ingin mendiskusikan potensi konfik antar stakeholders dengan mempelajari konflik-konflik yang pernah terjadi dalam eksploitasi sumberdaya
laut di kepuluan Kei Maluku Tenggara. Dengan menganlisa konflik, diskusi dalam tulisan ini akan mengidentifikasi stakeholders (kepentingan, penguasaan sumberdaya dan strategistrategi mereka) serta konteks-konteks (terutama dalam hubungannya dengan power relations) yang mengerangkai konflik-konflik di antara mereka. Dengan diskusi ini diharapkan
dapat teridentifikasi beberapa potensi dan tantangan dalam praktik manajemen sumberdaya alam, laut khususnya, pada era otonomi daerah.
initiativeinIndonesia.Theresponsesoftheselocalactorsdemonstratebothopportunitiesforupgrading
in the fisheries valuechainandchallengesformoresustainable fisheries management.Small-scale
fisheries aretheleastregulatednaturalresourcesectorinIndonesia,butrecentinitiativesattemptto
address problemsofover-fishing, povertyandlivelihoodinsecurity.Thisarticleexaminesonesuch
initiative,theLesserSundaSustainableFisheriesInitiative(LSSFI),andattitudestowardsitheldbylocal
fishers. TheLSSFIcombinesmarketincentivesandsupportwithaTerritorialUseRightsinFisheries
(TURF) systemandreserve.Fishersgenerallyviewedmarket-basedincentivespositively,seeingthemas
enhancing theirlivelihoodsandfreeingthemfromdebt-basedpatronagerelationships.Incontrast,
fishers hadmixedresponsestotheTURF-reserveproposal.Thosewhowerelessmobileagreedtothe
TURF-reserve,whilethosewho fish distantcoastalwatersaswellasadjacentareaswereopposed.An
additional barriertotheacceptanceofTURF-reservesisthatmostsmall-scale fisheries inIndonesiaexist
as anopenaccessresourceandconfidence intheabilityofthegovernmenttoenforcereserveareas
is low.
BOOK by Dedi S Adhuri
Book Chapter by Dedi S Adhuri
ABSTRACT This paper discusses the socio-cultural and civilization intersections among nations connected by the Indian Ocean, from Indonesian perspective. It focuses on three different but connected issues, these are 1) the sailing history which is seen as the process of interaction involving socio-cultural exchange of involved nations; 2) the products of the interactions, and; 3) the diaspora of Indian ocean connected nations. In regard to the first, this paper argues that various ethnic groups in Indonesian had long been involved in the history of Indian Ocean sailing tradition. Indonesians acted both as hosts of the coming of various nations as well as the visitors to various countries as far as Middle East, Africa, India, Southeast Asian countries to the east and north and Australia to the south. The products of these long lasting and intensive interactions are mutual adoptions of social-cultural elements and even civilization among involved nations. Language, religions, social structure, ancient monuments such as temples, mosques are some examples of the products of the processes. Diaspora of Indonesian ethnic groups in various Indian ocean countries and the diaspora of various nations in Indonesia are other form of these cultural intersections. Unlike the adoptions of socio-cultural elements mentioned earlier that have taken place in the past, the diasporas demonstrate that these interactions and exchanges are not only a history but continues processes until the present time. These are expressed by the interactions of diaspora communities with their host nations as well as their interactions with their countries of origin.
transitions to contemporary forms of governance like the ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF)—the
focus of our study. We document and critically reflect on participatory diagnosis processes and outcomes
at sites in Indonesia, Philippines, Solomon Islands and Tanzania. These sites were part of an international project on the implementation of the EAF and differed widely in institutional and operational contexts.
The Participatory Diagnosis and Adaptive Management framework and the “issue radar” diagnosis map were used to identify, evaluate and address factors associated with navigating management transitions towards the EAF. We found that many challenges and priority actions identified by participants were similar across the four study countries. Participants emphasized habitat restoration, particularly
mangrove rehabilitation, and livelihood enhancement. The importance of strengthening governance entities, networks and processes (e.g., harmonization of policies, education and awareness of policies) was also a prominent outcome of the diagnosis. Site-specific factors were also explored together with the differing views among stakeholders. We conclude that diagnosis frameworks are indeed useful tools for guiding management transitions in fisheries, particularly where they enable flexibility in approaches to diagnosing problems and applying solutions to local contexts.
sumberdaya alam seperti apa yang memungkinkan tercapainya pemanfaatan optimal sumberdaya alam sedemikian rupa sehingga kegiatan tersebut dapat menyumbangkan sesuatu
pada peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat tanpa menganggu keberlangsungan (sustainability) dari sumberdaya alam itu sendiri. Untuk keperluan itu, pengevaluasian terhadap praktik pengelolaan yang telah ada tentu sangatlah berguna. Melalui evaluasi, kita bisa belajar kelemahan dan kelebihannya. Dengan pelajaran itu, perumusan pola manajemen yang baru akan berlandaskan pada kondisi yang telah ada dan bukan sesuatu
yang diimpor begitu saja dari luar tanpa mempertimbangkan relevansi kontekstualnya.
Dilandasi logika seperti di atas, tulisan ini ingin mendiskusikan potensi konfik antar stakeholders dengan mempelajari konflik-konflik yang pernah terjadi dalam eksploitasi sumberdaya
laut di kepuluan Kei Maluku Tenggara. Dengan menganlisa konflik, diskusi dalam tulisan ini akan mengidentifikasi stakeholders (kepentingan, penguasaan sumberdaya dan strategistrategi mereka) serta konteks-konteks (terutama dalam hubungannya dengan power relations) yang mengerangkai konflik-konflik di antara mereka. Dengan diskusi ini diharapkan
dapat teridentifikasi beberapa potensi dan tantangan dalam praktik manajemen sumberdaya alam, laut khususnya, pada era otonomi daerah.
initiativeinIndonesia.Theresponsesoftheselocalactorsdemonstratebothopportunitiesforupgrading
in the fisheries valuechainandchallengesformoresustainable fisheries management.Small-scale
fisheries aretheleastregulatednaturalresourcesectorinIndonesia,butrecentinitiativesattemptto
address problemsofover-fishing, povertyandlivelihoodinsecurity.Thisarticleexaminesonesuch
initiative,theLesserSundaSustainableFisheriesInitiative(LSSFI),andattitudestowardsitheldbylocal
fishers. TheLSSFIcombinesmarketincentivesandsupportwithaTerritorialUseRightsinFisheries
(TURF) systemandreserve.Fishersgenerallyviewedmarket-basedincentivespositively,seeingthemas
enhancing theirlivelihoodsandfreeingthemfromdebt-basedpatronagerelationships.Incontrast,
fishers hadmixedresponsestotheTURF-reserveproposal.Thosewhowerelessmobileagreedtothe
TURF-reserve,whilethosewho fish distantcoastalwatersaswellasadjacentareaswereopposed.An
additional barriertotheacceptanceofTURF-reservesisthatmostsmall-scale fisheries inIndonesiaexist
as anopenaccessresourceandconfidence intheabilityofthegovernmenttoenforcereserveareas
is low.