
Shehata E Abdel Raheem
http://www.aun.edu.eg/membercv.php?M_ID=821,
https://publons.com/researcher/1247245/shehata-e-abdel-raheem/
http://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=F92Y6oIAAAAJ
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shehata_Abdel_Raheem,
http://aun.academia.edu/ShehataEAbdelRaheem
http://www.reviewerpage.com/ShehataEAbdelRaheem
http://www.cscjournals.org/journals/IJE/editorial-board.php
Supervisors: Toshiro Hayashikawa and Aly Gamal ALy
https://publons.com/researcher/1247245/shehata-e-abdel-raheem/
http://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=F92Y6oIAAAAJ
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shehata_Abdel_Raheem,
http://aun.academia.edu/ShehataEAbdelRaheem
http://www.reviewerpage.com/ShehataEAbdelRaheem
http://www.cscjournals.org/journals/IJE/editorial-board.php
Supervisors: Toshiro Hayashikawa and Aly Gamal ALy
less
Related Authors
Judith L Green
University of California, Santa Barbara
Andreas Umland
National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Stefano Maffei
Politecnico di Milano
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Michele Brun
University of Cagliari
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Petra Reinke
University of Virginia
Iolanda Craifaleanu
Technical University Of Civil Engineering, Bucharest
Franco Bontempi
Università degli Studi "La Sapienza" di Roma
Hany Elosta
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
InterestsView All (15)
Uploads
Papers by Shehata E Abdel Raheem
the potential of various control approaches to reduce vibration, their effectiveness in mitigating the dynamic effects on structures under real-world conditions appears limited once implemented. A variety of factors, including practical constraints, the choice of the control system device, the shape of the structure, and the amount of control energy deployed, contribute to this lack of efficiency.
Within this context, the literature primarily addressed the discrepancy between the mathematical model and the actual structure model, commonly referred to as parameter uncertainties, in the controller design process. In other words, logical continuity in this field involves the application of a more adapted control approach, which enhances performance by incorporating more practical aspects in the controller synthesis procedure. These aspects include the dynamics of the control
device, high-frequency neglected modes, and the inherent limitations or constraints of the control equipment. Thus, this study treats two main active control systems, ABS and AMD. While applying an approach known as μ-synthesis, the robust control was retained because of its ability to include all these considerations when they act simultaneously. We used this control to make sure that a three-degree-of-freedom structure responds as little as possible to seismic requests, which are shown
by an uncertain model. We then conducted a comparative study between these two systems, focusing on displacement reduction and control force, while exploring a classic AMD control system at the top of the structure and an ABS control system at the bottom. This approach proved to be a powerful way to deal with the uncertainties affecting the structure and achieve the stability design objectives, given the satisfying simulation results.
Structural Analysis on Stress analysis exam
Prof. Shehata E Abdel Raheem &Dr Mahmoud H Mansour
Structural analysis and seismic resilience in civil engineering have paid significant attention to the dynamics of engineering facilities and their social and economic functions, including essential functions of buildings and infrastructures. Modern society requires that structures exhibit higher levels of resilience, especially under earthquakes. The measure of resilience can adequately reflect a city’s capacity to withstand disasters. Quantitative results of seismic resilience assessments in the pre-earthquake environment can further support emergency response planning and seismic retrofits strategies. Thus, the seismic resilience of civil structures is gaining increasing interest as a special approach that goes beyond design codes. Resilience is the ability to absorb or avoid damage without experiencing complete failure, and should be the goal of design, maintenance and restoration of buildings and infrastructures. Mitigating structural damage to infrastructure under such seismic motions remains a major challenge. The continuous development of new materials, novel analysis techniques, design concepts, and numerical analysis tools presents promising advances that could help the research community and designers overcome design and implementation challenges in creating resilient structures.
This Special Issue is focused on recent advances in structural analysis and seismic resilience within civil engineering. We welcome articles that focus on the latest developments in innovative techniques and solutions for structural analysis, seismic resilience, seismic hazard resilient structures, performance-based design, and innovative structural systems for earthquake-resilient buildings. The collection will be of interest to academics and structural and construction engineers but also architects and other professionals involved in the building and construction fields. The submission of original research studies, review papers, and experimental and/or numerical investigations focused on the structural analysis and seismic resilience of buildings and infrastructures is warmly encouraged. Both new projects/applications and interventions on existing structural systems will be of interest for the Special Issue.
Contributions on the following topics are welcome. Potential topics that fall in the scope of the research topic include, but are not limited to, the following:
Advanced composite materials for retrofitting
Analysis of constructional materials under seismic loads
Damage detection and condition assessment
Damage limitation design and life-cycle sustainability
Innovative practices in seismic-resilient structural design
Innovative structural systems for damage minimization and recoverability after earthquakes
Integrated techniques for the seismic retrofitting and strengthening
New structural systems for resilient structures
Performance-based seismic design of structures
Seismic hazard and risk-mitigation measures
Multi-level seismic performance of critical infrastructures under design-basis earthquakes and maximum-credible earthquakes
Seismic resilience assessment
Seismic safety assessment and retrofit of existing structures
Seismic vulnerability assessment of structures
Structural health monitoring
Structural vibration control
Vibration analysis and dynamic characterization
Prof. Dr. Shehata E. Abdel Raheem
Prof. Dr. Humberto Varum
Dr. Dario De Domenico
Guest Editors
the potential of various control approaches to reduce vibration, their effectiveness in mitigating the dynamic effects on structures under real-world conditions appears limited once implemented. A variety of factors, including practical constraints, the choice of the control system device, the shape of the structure, and the amount of control energy deployed, contribute to this lack of efficiency.
Within this context, the literature primarily addressed the discrepancy between the mathematical model and the actual structure model, commonly referred to as parameter uncertainties, in the controller design process. In other words, logical continuity in this field involves the application of a more adapted control approach, which enhances performance by incorporating more practical aspects in the controller synthesis procedure. These aspects include the dynamics of the control
device, high-frequency neglected modes, and the inherent limitations or constraints of the control equipment. Thus, this study treats two main active control systems, ABS and AMD. While applying an approach known as μ-synthesis, the robust control was retained because of its ability to include all these considerations when they act simultaneously. We used this control to make sure that a three-degree-of-freedom structure responds as little as possible to seismic requests, which are shown
by an uncertain model. We then conducted a comparative study between these two systems, focusing on displacement reduction and control force, while exploring a classic AMD control system at the top of the structure and an ABS control system at the bottom. This approach proved to be a powerful way to deal with the uncertainties affecting the structure and achieve the stability design objectives, given the satisfying simulation results.
Structural Analysis on Stress analysis exam
Prof. Shehata E Abdel Raheem &Dr Mahmoud H Mansour
Structural analysis and seismic resilience in civil engineering have paid significant attention to the dynamics of engineering facilities and their social and economic functions, including essential functions of buildings and infrastructures. Modern society requires that structures exhibit higher levels of resilience, especially under earthquakes. The measure of resilience can adequately reflect a city’s capacity to withstand disasters. Quantitative results of seismic resilience assessments in the pre-earthquake environment can further support emergency response planning and seismic retrofits strategies. Thus, the seismic resilience of civil structures is gaining increasing interest as a special approach that goes beyond design codes. Resilience is the ability to absorb or avoid damage without experiencing complete failure, and should be the goal of design, maintenance and restoration of buildings and infrastructures. Mitigating structural damage to infrastructure under such seismic motions remains a major challenge. The continuous development of new materials, novel analysis techniques, design concepts, and numerical analysis tools presents promising advances that could help the research community and designers overcome design and implementation challenges in creating resilient structures.
This Special Issue is focused on recent advances in structural analysis and seismic resilience within civil engineering. We welcome articles that focus on the latest developments in innovative techniques and solutions for structural analysis, seismic resilience, seismic hazard resilient structures, performance-based design, and innovative structural systems for earthquake-resilient buildings. The collection will be of interest to academics and structural and construction engineers but also architects and other professionals involved in the building and construction fields. The submission of original research studies, review papers, and experimental and/or numerical investigations focused on the structural analysis and seismic resilience of buildings and infrastructures is warmly encouraged. Both new projects/applications and interventions on existing structural systems will be of interest for the Special Issue.
Contributions on the following topics are welcome. Potential topics that fall in the scope of the research topic include, but are not limited to, the following:
Advanced composite materials for retrofitting
Analysis of constructional materials under seismic loads
Damage detection and condition assessment
Damage limitation design and life-cycle sustainability
Innovative practices in seismic-resilient structural design
Innovative structural systems for damage minimization and recoverability after earthquakes
Integrated techniques for the seismic retrofitting and strengthening
New structural systems for resilient structures
Performance-based seismic design of structures
Seismic hazard and risk-mitigation measures
Multi-level seismic performance of critical infrastructures under design-basis earthquakes and maximum-credible earthquakes
Seismic resilience assessment
Seismic safety assessment and retrofit of existing structures
Seismic vulnerability assessment of structures
Structural health monitoring
Structural vibration control
Vibration analysis and dynamic characterization
Prof. Dr. Shehata E. Abdel Raheem
Prof. Dr. Humberto Varum
Dr. Dario De Domenico
Guest Editors