
Samer Frangie
Related Authors
Fadi A Bardawil
Duke University
Jens Hanssen
University of Toronto
Mark Reinhardt
Williams College
Maya Kesrouany
New York University Abu Dhabi
Nadia Bou Ali
American University of Beirut
Omnia El Shakry
Yale University
Nils Riecken
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
The Maydan
George Mason University
Micah Hughes
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
InterestsView All (8)
Uploads
Papers by Samer Frangie
critique in the periphery, as a way to probe the more general
problem of knowledge in and on the periphery. The paper will
look at the broken conversation between postcolonialism and
some trends of intellectuals in the Arab world. The two
moments of the story are the evaluation of anti-colonial
intellectuals by Postcolonialism, and the reception of Edward
Said’s Orientalism by intellectuals in the Arab world. Regarding
the first moment, the notion of ‘problem-space’ will be
deployed to warn against the universalizing tendencies of
postcolonialism. As to the second moment, the work of Mahdi
‘Amil and Sadek Jalal al-Azm is presented as illustrating the
primacy of the political in their reading and reception of Said’s
thesis. The conclusion argues for an excavation of the political
from underneath the epistemological critique as a way to renew
the broken conversation between the metropole and the
periphery.
critique in the periphery, as a way to probe the more general
problem of knowledge in and on the periphery. The paper will
look at the broken conversation between postcolonialism and
some trends of intellectuals in the Arab world. The two
moments of the story are the evaluation of anti-colonial
intellectuals by Postcolonialism, and the reception of Edward
Said’s Orientalism by intellectuals in the Arab world. Regarding
the first moment, the notion of ‘problem-space’ will be
deployed to warn against the universalizing tendencies of
postcolonialism. As to the second moment, the work of Mahdi
‘Amil and Sadek Jalal al-Azm is presented as illustrating the
primacy of the political in their reading and reception of Said’s
thesis. The conclusion argues for an excavation of the political
from underneath the epistemological critique as a way to renew
the broken conversation between the metropole and the
periphery.